创新生态与区域发展

全面创新改革试验、软环境与区域创新生态系统韧性——基于空间双重差分及双重机器学习的准自然实验

  • 吕鲲 ,
  • 潘均柏 ,
  • 李北伟
展开
  • (1.宁波大学 商学院,浙江 宁波 315211;2.兰州大学 经济学院,甘肃 兰州 730099;3.吉林大学 商学与管理学院,吉林 长春 130022)
吕鲲(1988—),男,浙江宁波人,博士,宁波大学商学院特聘副研究员,研究方向为技术创新管理、大数据分析与挖掘;潘均柏(2001—),男,浙江宁波人,兰州大学经济学院硕士研究生,研究方向为区域经济;李北伟(1963—),男,吉林长春人,博士,吉林大学商学与管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为技术经济及管理。本文通讯作者:李北伟。

收稿日期: 2023-05-16

  修回日期: 2023-07-02

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-26

基金资助

国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CTQ028)

Comprehensive Innovation Reform Experiment, Soft Environment and Resilience of Regional Innovation Ecosystem:A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on SDID and DML

  • Lyu Kun ,
  • Pan Junbai ,
  • Li Beiwei
Expand
  • (1.Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211,China;2.School of Economics Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730099,China;3.School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022,China)

Received date: 2023-05-16

  Revised date: 2023-07-02

  Online published: 2024-08-26

摘要

采用2009—2021年中国内地30个省份面板数据(因数据不全,西藏地区未纳入统计),构建基于多样性、缓冲性、进化性、流动性、协调性五维特性的区域创新生态系统韧性评价体系及基于市场环境、政府治理环境、法制环境、金融环境、创新环境的区域软环境评价体系,运用空间双重差分模型、双重机器学习模型就全面创新改革和软环境对区域创新生态系统韧性的影响机制进行准自然实验,结果发现:全面创新改革和软环境均能显著强化区域创新生态系统韧性;全面创新改革对区域创新生态系统韧性具有负向空间效应,而软环境的空间效应能够强化区域创新生态系统韧性;全面创新改革能够强化软环境对区域创新生态系统韧性的促进作用,而软环境的空间效应对全面创新改革的空间效应具有调节作用;全面创新改革能够通过优化软环境对区域创新生态系统韧性的五维特性产生促进作用,但对多样性的影响有限。

本文引用格式

吕鲲 , 潘均柏 , 李北伟 . 全面创新改革试验、软环境与区域创新生态系统韧性——基于空间双重差分及双重机器学习的准自然实验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(16) : 24 -36 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.YX202305069

Abstract

The Chinese government is endeavoring to implement the strategy of innovation-driven development.From the perspective of regional innovation, research on regional innovation ecosystem based on niche theory has become the focus of academic research. A regional innovation ecosystem is a system formed by the material exchange, energy exchange, and information exchange between each innovation subject and its environment in a specific space and time range, and its resilience is considered to be the ability of the system to resist external shocks and disturbances, adjust and recover itself through the coordination of internal entities, resource integration and energy flow. Although there were 10 regions selected for comprehensive innovation reform pilot experiments, few studies have explored the impact mechanism of comprehensive innovation reform on the overall regional innovation ecosystem and its resilience. In addition, each evolution stage of the regional innovation ecosystem is closely related to the regional marketization process, economic development level, government behavior, resource stock and other environmental factors. The soft environment represented by laws and regulations, market price mechanism flexibility, and financial trading activity is profoundly affecting the evolution of the regional innovation ecosystem. Moreover, the comprehensive innovation reform test clearly takes policy measures and institutional arrangements as the key tasks of the reform. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate the comprehensive innovation reform experiment, the soft environment and the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem into a unified research framework for analysis.#br#This paper designs a set of quasi-natural experiments based on the SDID model and the DML model, and with the panel data of 30 provinces in mainland China (except Tibet) from 2009 to 2021, it conducts empirical research on the five mechanisms involved in the research system of "comprehensive innovation reform experiment—soft environment—resilience of regional innovation ecosystem": (1) the impact mechanism of comprehensive innovation reform experiment on the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem; (2) the impact of soft environment on the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem; (3) how the spatial effects of comprehensive innovation reform experiment and soft environment affect the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem respectively; (4) whether the comprehensive innovation reform experiment can adjust the influence mechanism of soft environment on regional innovation ecosystem, and whether the adjustment effect is positive or negative; (5) the role of soft environment in the path of comprehensive innovation reform experiment on the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem.#br#It is concluded that, first, comprehensive innovation reform can impact innovation accumulation, knowledge aggregate and resource allocation optimization, which has a significant promoting effect on improving the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem. Among them, the comprehensive innovation reform can play a direct positive impact on the evolution, mobility and coordination of the regional innovation ecosystem, but the direct effect on diversity is not significant, indicating that the short-term economic behavior of local governments is not conducive to the development and scale expansion of multiple innovation entities in the regional innovation ecosystem. In addition, due to the siphon effect and disorderly competition between regions, comprehensive innovation reform will strengthen the geographical polarization of the resilience of regional innovation ecosystems.Second, a high-quality soft environment can provide favorable market competition conditions, stable social order, and structural improvement of the regional innovation ecosystem in terms of institutional arrangements and innovation ecological construction. Therefore, the positive factors in the region can be mobilized to strengthen the complexity, self-organization and self-recovery abilities of the regional innovation ecosystem, and enhance its resilience. In addition, the soft environment can also realize the spillover effect based on the economic spatial weight matrix. Finally, comprehensive innovation reform can strengthen the enhancement effect of soft environment on the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem, and the optimization of soft environment can adjust the negative spatial spillover effect of comprehensive innovation reform on the resilience of regional innovation ecosystem due to the spatial siphon effect. Meanwhile, comprehensive innovation reform can optimize the soft environment to promote the diversity, buffering, evolution, mobility and coordination of regional innovation ecosystem, especially for diversity. Although the comprehensive innovation reform itself has a limited impact on the diversification and scale development of innovation entities, it can have a positive indirect impact on diversity by adjusting the soft environment.#br#

参考文献

[1] MEEROW S,NEWELL J P,STULTS M.Defining urban resilience:a review[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2016,147(1):38-49.
[2] 张杰,付奎.创新制度改革与城市全要素生产率提升——来自全面创新改革试验区的经验证据[J].现代经济探讨,2021,40(9):26-35.
[3] 尹力.推进全面创新改革试验 打造四川高质量发展战略支撑[J].宏观经济管理,2018,34(10):14-15,20.
[4] 袁文融,杨震宁.营商环境如何影响居民创业——营商硬环境与软环境的异同[J].技术经济,2021,40(11):35-45.
[5] 王敏,张兴隆,段佳萌.全面创新改革试验区能否促进产业结构升级[J].财经科学,2022,66(3):135-148.
[6] 刘艳,曹伟,李石柱,等.上海市全面创新改革试验区相关政策研究[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(23):72-78.
[7] 朱松平,叶阿忠.技术进步视角下经济政策不确定性对经济增长的影响研究[J].系统科学与数学,2022,42(2):398-416.
[8] 晏小燕.硬环境、金融机会与区际发展差异——基于机会平等视角[J].商业经济研究,2015,690(35):84-87.
[9] 于东平,段万春.区域软环境、企业家能力与中小企业绩效[J].科研管理,2012,33(12):68-77.
[10] 夏绪梅,李翔.营商环境与城市创新创业质量的协同机制及其关系检验[J].统计与决策,2023,39(7):184-188.
[11] GARACIA F, JIN B, SALOMON R.Does inward foreign direct investment improve the innovative performance of local firms[J].Research Policy, 2013, 42(1):231-244.
[12] 章志华,贺建风.知识产权保护如何影响OFDI的绿色创新效率[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,45(4):73-88.
[13] MONTMARTIN B, HERRERA M.Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives:empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models[J].Research Policy, 2015,44(5):1065-1079.
[14] 梁林,赵玉帛,刘兵.国家级新区创新生态系统韧性监测与预警研究[J].中国软科学,2020,35(7):92-111.
[15] CHAGAS A L S, AZZONI C R, ALMEIDA A N.A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2016, 59(6):24-36.
[16] CHERNOZHUKOV V, CHETVERIKOV D, DEMIRER M, et al.Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters[J].The Econometrics Journal,2018,21(1):1-68.
[17] 张涛,李均超.网络基础设施、包容性绿色增长与地区差距——基于双重机器学习的因果推断[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(4):113-135.
[18] 刘和东,鲁晨曦.创新生态系统韧性对经济高质量发展的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2023,39(1):48-57.
[19] 王欣,杜宝贵.全面创新改革试验政策对科技成果转化的影响效应[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(2):111-121.
[20] 吴传清,孟晓倩.虹吸还是溢出——“强省会”战略的经济增长极效应分析[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,46(1):124-136.
[21] 党文娟,罗庆凤.环境管制、知识产权保护与区域创新能力——基于我国省际面板数据的实证研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(3):203-215.
[22] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011,46(5):4-16,31.
[23] 马丽梅,司璐.低碳城市与可再生能源技术创新[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(7):81-90.
文章导航

/