对2015—2021年中国A股上市公司面板数据进行实证分析,结果发现:企业创新文化能够显著降低上市公司研发操纵概率,这一行为是通过提高上市公司产品市场竞争力,以及化解上市公司财务困境实施的。进一步研究发现,在民营企业、高新技术企业、管理层持股比例较高、无内部控制缺陷、未收到年报问询函以及媒体关注度较高企业,创新文化对企业研发操纵的抑制作用更为显著。结论不仅可以丰富企业创新文化与研发操纵关系研究,而且能够为政府部门制定研发操纵监管措施提供决策参考。
Innovation is the primary driving force for economic development.In order to encourage companies to undertake technological innovation and continuously promote high-quality development, China has introduced a series of tax incentives to support these efforts.However, with the increasing intensity of tax incentives, companies have frequently engaged in research and development (R&D) manipulation.This has become even more common since the implementation of the Measures for the Administration of the Recognition of High and New Technology Enterprises.For example, on April 8, 2020, the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a letter of concern showing that Zhengchuan Co.falsely reported R&D expenses as production costs, leading to an overstatement of R&D expenses by CNY 8.436 2 million in the first half of 2019.Additionally, among enterprises with annual revenue exceeding CNY 200 million and R&D expenses accounting for more than 3% of operating revenue between 2015 and 2021,29.45% of the enterprises controlled the R&D expense income ratio between 3% and 4%.Therefore, it is urgent to explore how to reduce the manipulation of R&D expenses of listed companies and maintain the original purpose and fairness of tax incentives.#br#However, a review of existing literature reveals that scholars have conducted extensive research on the manipulation of research and development (R&D) in listed companies, as well as on corporate and innovative cultures.Particularly in the study of R&D manipulation, although scholars have explored its impact on R&D manipulation from the perspective of ethical culture, they mainly focus on the moral aspect of ethical culture while lacking exploration of the influence of a cohesive innovative culture and an innovation-driven perspective on R&D manipulation in listed companies.In the study of corporate innovative culture, existing research mainly considers the impact of innovative culture on enterprise innovation input and output, while lacking relevant literature to explore the "pseudo-innovation" behavior of R&D manipulation in enterprises under the influence of innovative culture.#br#This study conducts an empirical test on the relationship between corporate innovation culture and R&D manipulation using panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2021.There are 22 363 sample observations obtained after screening.To test the overall effect of corporate innovation culture on the R&D manipulation of the dependent variable, this study constructs a Logit regression model for testing.It has been found that corporate innovation culture can significantly reduce the probability of R&D manipulation by listed companies.Moreover, this relationship is achieved by improving the product market competitiveness of listed companies and reducing the likelihood of financial difficulties.Further research has also found that in samples of private enterprises, high-tech enterprises, and companies with higher management shareholding ratios, no internal control deficiencies, no annual report inquiry letters received and higher media attention, the inhibitory effect of innovation culture on corporate R&D manipulation is more significant.#br#The main research contributions of this study are threefold.First, for the first time, this study examines the relationship between innovation culture and research and development manipulation, expands the research on the governance effect of innovation culture and the influencing factors of corporate research and development manipulation, and explains the impact of innovation culture on corporate research and development manipulation mechanisms.Second, by demonstrating the universality of corporate research and development manipulation, it provides corresponding empirical evidence for regulatory authorities to strengthen the approval and supervision of high-tech enterprises in order to reduce the behavior of corporate research and development manipulation, promote substantive research and development innovation in listed companies, and promote high-quality development of enterprises.Third, by testing the heterogeneity of corporate characteristics and internal and external corporate governance, it provides corresponding references for listed companies in the arrangement of internal and external governance so as to fully exert the cohesion and initiative of corporate innovation culture.#br#
[1] 陈依元.创新文化:自主创新的文化驱动力[J].中国发明与专利, 2009, 6(5):131-134.
[2] 桂黄宝, 孙璞, 江密.创新文化竞争力国际比较研究[J].科学管理研究, 2021, 39(4):159-167.
[3] 杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏,等.减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J].经济研究, 2017, 52(8):110-124.
[4] 楚有为.审计委员会专业背景与企业研发活动盈余操纵[J].现代财经:天津财经大学学报, 2018, 38(10):96-113.
[5] 杨宗翰, 雷良海, 张一纯.研发操纵,融资约束与上市公司创新效率[J].科技管理研究, 2020, 40(8):17-26.
[6] 杨宗翰, 雷良海, 廖东声.研发操纵行为是否抑制上市公司高质量发展[J].系统工程, 2020, 38(4):19-32.
[7] 史方.研发操纵与税负扭曲——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].云南财经大学学报, 2021, 37(6):67-80.
[8] LUMPKIN G T , DESS G G .Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance[J].Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(1):135-172.
[9] O'REILLY C J CHATMAN.Culture as social control: corporations,cults,and commitment[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2013,18 (1):157-200.
[10] 周顺兴.银行业竞争、客户筛选与村镇银行二元绩效:传导机制与实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2016, 36(4):34-44.
[11] 韩岚岚.创新投入、内部控制与成本粘性[J].经济与管理研究, 2018, 39(10):131-144.
[12] 白彦壮, 张春情, 殷红春.创新文化环境驱动的自主品牌竞争力构建[J].科技管理研究, 2016, 36(15):257-261.
[13] 郝婷, 马研硕.经济增加值考核是否会引发企业研发操纵行为——基于双重差分模型的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2022, 38(10):75-84.
[14] 符大海.财务困境研究基本问题浅探[J].财政研究, 2004, 25(12):52-53.
[15] 姚益龙, 邓湘益, 陈壮奋.有限责任效应、破产风险效应与资本结构——基于产品市场竞争视角的研究[J].学术研究, 2010, 41(6):77-80.
[16] PAUL, POVEL.Financial constraints and product market competition: exante vs.expost incentives[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(7): 917-949.
[17] 孙烨, 许艳.产品市场竞争与融资约束关系研究——基于董事会成员背景特征的中介作用[J].产业经济研究, 2016, 15(1):100-110.
[18] 孙昌玲, 王化成, 王芃芃.企业核心竞争力对供应链融资的影响: 资金支持还是占用[J].中国软科学, 2021, 36(6):120-134.
[19] 张功富, 宋献中.财务困境企业资本投资行为的实证研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财经理论与实践, 2007, 28(3):33-40.
[20] 肖忠意, 林琳, 陈志英,等.企业金融化与上市公司创新研发投入——基于董事会治理与创新文化的调节作用的实证分析[J].南开经济研究, 2021, 37(1):143-163.
[21] 李岩琼, 姚颐.研发文本信息:真的多说无益吗——基于分析师预测的文本分析[J].会计研究, 2020, 41(2):26-42.
[22] 贾军, 魏雅青.产品市场竞争,客户关系治理与企业创新关系研究——基于行业竞争程度与企业市场地位的双重考量[J].软科学, 2019, 33(12):66-71.
[23] 高梦捷.公司战略、高管激励与财务困境[J].财经问题研究, 2018, 40(3):101-108.
[24] 何瑛, 于文蕾, 杨棉之.CEO复合型职业经历,企业风险承担与企业价值[J].中国工业经济, 2019, 36(5):75-82.
[25] 何慧华, 方军雄.监管型小股东的治理效应:基于财务重述的证据[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(12):176-194.
[26] 陆明富.连锁董事与问询函监管——来自沪深交易所年报问询的证据[J].山西财经大学学报, 2022, 44(9):87-99.
[27] 吴先聪, 郑国洪.媒体关注对大股东违规减持有监督作用吗[J].外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(11):86-103.