科技人才培育

领导员工互动公平对团队创造力的影响机制:一个被调节的中介模型

  • 刘新梅 ,
  • 李智勇 ,
  • 杨晓梅 ,
  • 王博苑
展开
  • (1.西安交通大学 管理学院;2.西安交通大学 过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710049)
刘新梅(1962—),女,河北石家庄人,博士,西安交通大学管理学院、过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室教授、博士生导师,研究方向为产业经济与技术管理、服务创新与管理;李智勇(1981—),男,江苏扬州人,西安交通大学管理学院、过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室博士研究生,研究方向为知识管理与团队创造力;杨晓梅(1992—),女,陕西榆林人,西安交通大学管理学院、过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室博士研究生,研究方向为创新与创造力、领导行为;王博苑(1997—),女,陕西府谷人,西安交通大学管理学院、过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室硕士研究生,研究方向为创新与创造力。本文通讯作者:刘新梅。

收稿日期: 2022-10-31

  修回日期: 2023-02-02

  网络出版日期: 2024-04-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572140)

The Influence of Leader-member Interactional Justice on Team Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model

  • Liu Xinmei ,
  • Li Zhiyong ,
  • Yang Xiaomei ,
  • Wang Boyuan
Expand
  • (1.School of Management,Xi′an Jiaotong University;2.The Key Lab of the Ministry of Education for Process Control & Efficiency Engineering,Xi′an Jiaotong University,Xi′an 710049,China)

Received date: 2022-10-31

  Revised date: 2023-02-02

  Online published: 2024-04-10

摘要

领导员工互动公平作为一种组织公平,反映团队成员对自身与领导沟通质量的感知,能够有效增强团队创造力,维持企业核心竞争优势,促进企业繁荣稳定发展。基于102个知识型团队样本,以团队内竞争为中介变量,以权力距离导向为调节变量,从直接和间接传导机制两个维度阐释领导员工互动公平对团队创造力的内在影响机理,研究发现:①领导员工互动公平与团队创造力正相关;②团队内发展性竞争在领导员工互动公平与团队创造力关系中发挥完全中介作用;③权力距离导向正向调节领导员工互动公平与团队发展性竞争的关系、负向调节领导员工互动公平与团队过度性竞争的关系;④权力距离导向正向调节团队内发展性竞争在领导员工互动公平与团队创造力关系间的中介作用。

本文引用格式

刘新梅 , 李智勇 , 杨晓梅 , 王博苑 . 领导员工互动公平对团队创造力的影响机制:一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(7) : 122 -131 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022100886

Abstract

As a kind of organizational justice, leader-member interactional justice reflects the perception of team members on the quality of communication with leaders, and it can promote team creativity, help enterprises maintain their core competitive advantages, and ensure their prosperity and stable development. Since interactive justice is usually generated within teams, team members often pursue interactive justice. When leaders show sincerity and frankness to their subordinates, members will feel that leaders respect them and attach importance to their opinions , which is conducive to smooth and efficient communication. Thus, it is not only beneficial for leaders to gain the support of the whole team, but also helps to stimulate the emergence of creative ideas during the interaction process, thus effectively enhancing the creativity of the entire team.#br#With a sample of 102 knowledge teams in more than 10 Chinese high-technology firms, this study adopts statistical analysis methods to test the proposed hypotheses. Moreover, it sets intra-team competition as the mediator variable, and power distance orientation as a moderator variable to clarify the internal mechanism of leader-member interactional justice on team creativity from two dimensions of direct and indirect transmission mechanisms.#br#The main findings are as follows. First, leader-member interactional justice has a positive effect on team creativity. Second, the development competition of intra-team competition plays a full mediating role between leader-member interactional justice and team creativity. Third, power distance orientation plays a positive moderating role between leader-member interactional justice and intra-team development competition, and power distance orientation plays a negative moderating role between leader-member interactional justice and intra-team hypercompetition. Fourth, power distance orientation positively moderates intra-team development competition, and plays a mediator role between leader-member interactional justice and team creativity. The higher power the distance orientation is , the stronger the mediator effect will be, and vice versa.#br#By exploring the effect of leader-member interactional justice on team creativity, the study expands the theory of organizational justice. It effectively makes up for the lack of research on the relationship between interactive justice and team creativity within the framework of organizational justice. Moreover, on the basis of the group involvement model, this study not only explores the direct relationship between interactional justice and team creativity, but also highlights the mediating mechanism of intra-team competition, making a significant contribution to the research field of intra-team competition. Besides, the conclusion that power distance orientation can significantly moderate the relationship between leader-employee interactional justice and team creativity is helpful to deepen the understanding of the effectiveness of power distance orientation at the team level.#br#This study also has some significance for team creativity in practice. First, organizations should further improve the awareness of positive interaction between leaders and members, and urge leaders to pay more attention to fair interaction with their subordinates. Therefore, they can carry out a series of training or educational activities to improve the skills and methods of team leaders and improve the interactive fairness of leaders and members. Moreover, leaders should adhere to the values of respect, appropriate behavior, and frankness to interact with members in a positive way, and pass on the norms needed to complete the organizational common goals to members through incentives, appropriate behavior and feedback, so as to improve the effectiveness of information exchange and communication within the teams. Second, in each work team, team leaders need to monitor the competition among the team members at all times. Also, leaders should actively create opportunities to encourage information sharing within the team. For instance, members are encouraged to hold frequent seminars to share information or knowledge, and ensure close communication among members to absorb and integrate suggestions from others to better complete work tasks. Finally, organizations need to cultivate team members with a high power distance orientation. What′s more, leaders should be valued in organizations, for it is conducive to building close relationships with their subordinates, and leaders should care about their subordinates and the whole interests of teams.#br#

参考文献

[1] KIM S L,KIM M,YUN S.What do we need for creativity the interaction of perfectionism and overall justice on creativity[J].Personnel Review,2017,46(1):154-167.
[2] COLQUITT J A.On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(3): 386-400.
[3] HOLT L,BOBOCEL D R,CHEN V.Delivering bad news fairly: higher construal level promotes interactional justice enactment through perspective taking[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2020,46(6): 708-725.
[4] TREADWAYB J C & D C.Organizational identification and perceived organizational support as mediators of the procedural justice-citizenship behaviour relationship: a cross-cultural constructive replication[J].European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology,2011,20(5):631-653.
[5] 王艇,郑全全,王国猛.互动公平为何能够影响对组织的公民行为:领导原型化和组织认同的作用[J].管理工程学报,2018,32(4): 71-78.
[6] LOPEZ-CABARCOS A,PINEIRO-CHOUSA J,VAZQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ P,et al.The role of bullying in the development of organizational citizenship behaviors[J].Journal of Business Research,2020,115: 272-280.
[7] BROWN S P,CRON W L,SLOCUM J W.Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance[J].Journal of Marketing,1998,62(4): 88-98.
[8] RYCKMAN R M,HAMMER M,KACZOR L M,et al.Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,1996,66(2): 374-385.
[9] DECI E L,BETLEY G,KAHLE J,et al.When trying to win: competition and intrinsic motivation[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1981,7(1): 79-83.
[10] VANDERCRUYSSE S,VANDEWAETERE M,CORNILLIE F,et al.Competition and students' perceptions in a game-based language learning environment[J].Educational Technology Research and Development,2013,61: 927-950.
[11] HE H,BARUCH Y,LIN C P.Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: the role of within-team competition[J].Human Relations,2014,67: 947-978.
[12] KILDUFF G J,GALINSKY A D,GALLO E,et al.Whatever it takes to win: rivalry increases unethical behavior[J].Academy of Management Journal,2016,59: 1508-1534.
[13] 郑晓明,刘鑫.互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用[J].心理学报,2016,48(6): 693-709.
[14] GUZMAN F,FU X.I'll speak up if my voice is in line with my leader's values: relating power distance and voice[J].Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings,2019,2019(1): 1.
[15] 刘生敏.员工权力距离对其抑制性建言的影响: 真实型领导的调节作用[J].中国人力资源开发,2016(19): 46-55.
[16] HU J,JUDGE T A.Leader-team complementarity: exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance[J].The Journal of Applied Psychology,2017,102(6): 935-955.
[17] JAHANTAB F,VIDYARTHI P R,ANAND S.When do i-deals make one central contextual effects of task interdependence and power distance[C]//Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2020, 2020(1): 12434.
[18] 田晓明,段锦云,傅强.群体卷入模型:理论背景、内容介绍与未来展望[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(10):1628-1635.
[19] 周晔,黄旭,谢五届.资质过剩感会激发员工建言吗——基于公平启发视角[J].管理评论,2020,32(12): 192-203.
[20] AJLOUN W,KAUR G,ALOMARI S A.Effective organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior using fuzzy logic to obtain the optimal relationship[J].Quality Management in Health Care,2021,30(1):13-20.
[21] RYCKMAN R M,LIBBYI C R,BORNE B V,et al.Values of hypercompetitive and personal development competitive individuals[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,1997,69(2): 271-283.
[22] GAO S.Influence of psychological contract on organizational citizenship behavior of knowledge staffr-based on moderating effect of organizational justice[J].Technical Economy and Management Research,2017,4: 69-73.
[23] 付博,于桂兰,梁潇杰.上下级关系实践对员工工作绩效的“双刃剑”效应:一项跨层次分析[J].科研管理,2019,40(8): 273-283.
[24] GUPTA B,WANG K Y,CAI W J.Interactional justice and willingness to share tacit knowledge: perceived cost as a mediator,and respectful engagement as moderator[J].Personnel Review,2020,50(2): 478-497.
[25] NI D,LIU X,ZHENG X.How do subordinates react to perceived narcissistic supervision the roles of perceived interactional justice and need for belonging[J].Baltic Journal of Management,2021,16(4):621-637.
[26] NAZIR S,SHAFI A,ATIF M M,et al.How organization justice and perceived organizational support facilitate employees' innovative behavior at work[J].Employee Relations,2019,41(6):1288-1311.
[27] SULAIMAN M K,SARAIH U N,SAKDAN M F,et al.The effects of interactional justice and ocb on burnout: empirical evidences among housemen in malaysia public hospital[C].AIP Conference,2021.
[28] 董方超,高虹,丁婷.创新团队公平感知与知识共享行为关系研究——以成员信任为中介变量[J].河北工业科技,2016,33(3):194-201.
[29] RYCKMAN R M,THORNTON B,BULTER J C.Personality correlates of the hypercompetitive attitude scale: validity tests of horney′s theory of neurosis[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,1994,62(1): 84-94.
[30] GLAMAN J M,JONES A P,ROZELLE R M.Competitiveness and the similarity of preferred coworkers[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2002,32: 142-158.
[31] CLUGSTON M,HOWEL J P,DORFMAN P W.Does cultural socializations predict multiple bases and foci of commitment [J].Journal of Management,2000,26(1): 5-30.
[32] NEBEL S,SCHNEIDER S,REY G D.From duels to classroom competition: social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group size[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2016,55: 384-398.
[33] 谢俊,汪林,储小平,等.组织公正视角下的员工创造力形成机制及心理授权的中介作用[J].管理学报,2013,10(2): 206-212.
[34] VITELL S J,NWACHUKWU S L,BARNES J H.The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: an application of Hofstede's typology[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1993,12(10): 753-760.
[35] 高山.心理契约对知识型员工组织公民行为的影响——基于组织公平的调节作用[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017,38(4): 69-73.
[36] WANG H,ZHANG C,JIANG M.The effects of congruence in trust and power distance in supervisor-subordinate relationships[C]//Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2018, 2018(1): 15774.
[37] LEE C,PILLUTLA M,LAW K S.Power-distance,gender and organizational justice[J].Journal of Management,2000,26(4): 685-704.
[38] SHIN S J,ZHOU J.When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams transformational leadership as a moderator[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(6): 1709-1721.
文章导航

/