可再生能源技术创新是我国建设新型能源体系的重要保障,是实现“双碳”目标的重要手段,也是减排不减生产力的重要支柱。基于分位数面板模型与空间杜宾模型,利用2000—2019年中国内地30个省份9个行业面板数据,实证分析可再生能源技术创新的行业碳减排效应及其在不同经济发展阶段、地区的异质性表现。结果表明,可再生能源技术创新对不同行业碳排放的影响存在较大差异,碳减排效果与行业特征、区域环境及经济发展阶段密切相关。具体地,低碳排放行业率先发挥可再生能源技术创新的碳减排效应,以重工业、能源生产相关行业为代表的高碳排放行业对碳排放未见显著抑制作用,与居民生活、城镇化发展联系紧密的行业碳排放不减反增。可再生能源技术创新对不同行业的碳减排效应随着时间推移均得到强化。基于研究结论,针对性提出持续推进可再生能源技术创新与转化、统筹推进可再生能源技术在不同区域与产业的差异化应用、注重居民低碳行为引导和加强合作交流等建议。研究有助于深入考察可再生能源技术创新对行业碳减排的影响,为针对性制定行业碳减排政策提供事实依据。
In order to achieve the goals of "peak carbon" and "carbon neutrality", China has been promoting renewable energy technology innovation as a key carbon reduction measure in China's energy production, industry, transportation and construction industries. However, its carbon reduction effect has not been given sufficient attention by academics. At this critical period when China is promoting a comprehensive low-carbon transition in its economic and social development, a scientific assessment of the effect of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emissions is essential to understand the status of carbon emission reduction in various industries, assess the carbon reduction potential of renewable energy technologies, and further choose the low-carbon pathways.#br#This paper empirically analyzes the effect of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emission using the quantile panel model and spatial Durbin model based on the patent data of renewable energy technology innovation in 30 Chinese provinces from 2000 to 2019, corresponding to nine industry-level carbon emission data, as well as economic-social related characteristic variables, and further dissects its heterogeneous effect and possible causes in different regions and development stages. It is found that the effects of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon dioxide emissions vary significantly across industries, and the effect is closely related to industry characteristics, regional environment, and economic development stage.#br#Specifically,renewable energy technology innovation has taken the lead in carbon emission reduction among the low-emission industries, which is mainly related to the electrification degree and technological characteristics of these industries. At the same time, the effect of carbon emission reduction is closely related to the development stage of the industry, and the advantage of industry development in the eastern region enables the carbon emission reduction of renewable energy technology to be better exerted. There is no evidence that renewable energy technology innovation has a significant inhibiting effect on carbon emissions in heavy industry and energy production-related industries which are mainly related to the fossil energy technology and institutional lock-in in high-emission industries. Coupled with the relatively long operational life of energy-related infrastructure, the introduction, digestion and absorption of renewable energy technology in these industries still takes some time. In contrast, with the advantage of "weak lock-in", geographical resources and policy in the western region, renewable energy technology innovation has taken the lead in achieving carbon emission reductions in energy production-related industries. Furthermore, the high energy rebound effect in sectors closely linked to residential life and urbanization, such as housing, services, construction, and transport, especially during the rapid economic and social development phase, has resulted in the impact of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emissions being statistically invalid, or even increasing rather than decreasing. In addition, it is noteworthy that the effect of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emissions reduction among different sectors has been strengthened over time. Then it is proposed to continue to encourage the innovation and transformation of renewable energy technologies, promote the differentiated application of renewable energy technologies in different regions and industries, focus on low-carbon behavior of residents, andstrengthen inter-regional cooperation and exchange.#br#The existing studies mostly use industrial technology innovation, low-carbon technology innovation and green technology innovation as the core explanatory variables to explore their carbon reduction performance, and because there are subsets of technologies with different characteristics and emission reduction mechanisms, their findings cannot be directly transferred to the carbon emission reduction experience of renewable energy technology innovation. This paper focuses on the effect of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emissions, andincorporates regions and sectors into a unified analytical framework to reveal the carbon reduction performance of renewable energy technology innovations and their carbon reduction processes across regions and sectors, which responds to the theoretical relationship between renewable energy technology innovation and carbon emissions from the perspective of industry heterogeneity. Moreover, combined with practical investigations and reports, it further explores the potential causes of the heterogeneous effect of renewable energy technology innovation on carbon emissions among different regions and industries, providing a comprehensive factual basis for industry-level technology carbon emission reduction and policy formulation.#br#
[1] 何建坤.碳达峰碳中和目标导向下能源和经济的低碳转型[J].环境经济研究,2021,6(1):1-9.
[2] 世界自然基金会, 中国循环经济协会可再生能源专业委员会. 中国可再生能源经验总结报告——以风力发电和光伏发电为主[R].CREIA,2021.
[3] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable technology innovation indicators: mapping progress in costs, patents and standards[R].IRENA,2022.
[4] International Energy Agency (IEA). 中国能源体系碳中和路线图[R].IEA,2022.
[5] 鄢哲明,杜克锐,张宁.可再生能源技术创新与碳减排——基于地区经济发展不平衡视角[J].环境经济研究,2022,7(1):56-77.
[6] 邵帅,范美婷,杨莉莉.经济结构调整、绿色技术进步与中国低碳转型发展——基于总体技术前沿和空间溢出效应视角的经验考察[J].管理世界,2022,38(2):4-10,46-69.
[7] YANG Y, CAI W J, WANG C. Industrial CO2 intensity, indigenous innovation and R&D spillovers in China's provinces[J].Applied Energy, 2014, 131(10): 117-127.
[8] 孙振清,刘保留,李欢欢.产业结构调整、技术创新与区域碳减排——基于地区面板数据的实证研究[J].经济体制改革,2020,38(3):101-108.
[9] 王林辉,杨洒洒,刘备.技术进步能源偏向性、能源消费结构与中国能源强度[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,315(1):75-87.
[10] 欧国立,王妍.交通运输业技术进步对二氧化碳排放的影响——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(11):64-71.
[11] 张济建,万安位,宋雅静.能源回弹效应下高碳产业低碳转型过程中的技术突变性[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(18):60-69.
[12] 黄雨涵,丁涛,李雨婷,等.碳中和背景下能源低碳化技术综述及对新型电力系统发展的启示[J].中国电机工程学报,2021,41(S1):28-51.
[13] 刘晓东,毕克新,叶惠.全球价值链下低碳技术突破性创新风险管理研究——以中国制造业为例[J].中国软科学,2016,31(11):152-166.
[14] WANG Z H, YANG Z M, ZHANG Y X, et al. Energy technology patents-CO2 emissions nexus: an empirical analysis from China[J].Energy Policy, 2012, 42: 248-260.
[15] LIN B Q, ZHU J P. The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: empirical evidence from China[J].Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 659: 1505-1512.
[16] CHENG Z H, LI L S, LIU J. Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 2935-2946.
[17] 马艳艳,逯雅雯,孙玉涛.技术进步、结构调整与碳排放强度——基于中国省区层面空间面板数据模型的实证[J].研究与发展管理,2016,28(5):23-33.
[18] 张兵兵,徐康宁,陈庭强.技术进步对二氧化碳排放强度的影响研究[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):567-576.
[19] 周小亮,宋立.中国工业低碳转型:现实分析与政策思考[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(8):22-41.
[20] 梁琳,林善浪.金融结构与经济绿色低碳发展[J].经济问题探索,2018,39(11):179-190.
[21] 张修凡.碳市场流动性与区域低碳经济转型——基于低碳技术创新的双重中介效应分析[J].南京财经大学学报,2021,39(6):88-98.
[22] 郭捷,杨立成.环境规制、政府研发资助对绿色技术创新的影响——基于中国内地省级层面数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(10):37-44.
[23] 陈强.高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[24] 李婧,谭清美,白俊红.中国区域创新生产的空间计量分析——基于静态与动态空间面板模型的实证研究[J].管理世界,2010,26(7):43-55,65.
[25] GUAN Y R, SHAN Y L, HUANG Q, et al. Assessment to China's recent emission pattern shifts[J].Earth's Future, 2021, 9(11): 1-13.
[26] POPP D. Induced innovation and energy prices[J].American Economic Review, 2002, 92(1): 160-180.
[27] HAELG L, WARLCHLI M, SCHMIDT T S. Supporting energy technology deployment while avoiding unintended technological lock-in: a policy design perspective[J].Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13(10): 104011.