区域科学发展

省会城市数字经济发展的影响——溢出还是虹吸

  • 刘耀彬 ,
  • 胡伟辉 ,
  • 骆康 ,
  • 卓冲 ,
  • 李硕硕
展开
  • (1.南昌大学 经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330031;2.海南大学 经济学院,海南 海口 571000;3.复旦大学 社会发展与公共政策学院,上海 200433)
刘耀彬(1970—),男,湖北麻城人,博士,南昌大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师,教育部长江学者特聘教授,研究方向为数字经济与城市发展;胡伟辉(1999—),男,江西婺源人,南昌大学经济管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为数字经济、区域经济;骆康(1993—),男,湖北蕲春人,海南大学经济学院副研究员,研究方向为数字经济、区域经济;卓冲(1999—),男,江西南昌人,复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院硕士研究生,研究方向为数字经济;李硕硕(1995—),男,山东滨州人,南昌大学经济管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为区域经济。本文通讯作者:骆康。

收稿日期: 2022-08-26

  修回日期: 2022-10-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(41871155);国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA047);国家科技重点研发专项(2022yfd1600603)

The Impact of Digital Economy Development in Provincial Capital Cities : Spillover or Siphon?

  • Liu Yaobin ,
  • Hu Weihui ,
  • Luo Kang ,
  • Zhuo chong ,
  • Li Shuoshuo
Expand
  • (1.School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; 2.School of Economics Hainan University,Haikou 571000,China;3.School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Received date: 2022-08-26

  Revised date: 2022-10-13

  Online published: 2023-08-10

摘要

数字经济具有外部性,省会城市数字经济发展对其它邻近城市的影响究竟是比翼齐飞的溢出效应,还是损人利己的虹吸效应?回答该问题对当前“强省会”战略实施和区域协调发展至关重要。从收入产出、劳动和资本投入角度构建理论模型,采用2011—2019年278个地级市面板数据,运用面板固定模型实证检验省会城市数字经济发展对地方城市的影响。结果显示:①省会城市数字经济发展促进地方城市数字经济发展,且溢出效应显著,一系列内生性和稳健性检验均证实该结论成立;②省会城市数字经济溢出效应的南北差距不明显,溢出效应主要发生在东中部地区,中等规模城市的溢出效应明显高于小规模和大规模城市;③省会城市数字经济溢出效应并不能通过分工机制予以解释,而是通过学习机制和共享机制实现。为此,需要深入实施“强省会”战略,发挥省会城市的引领示范辐射作用;坚持因地制宜发展原则,构建数字经济错位发展格局;明确省会城市和地方城市数字经济发展定位,充分释放数字经济潜能,打造分工协作的产业链条。

本文引用格式

刘耀彬 , 胡伟辉 , 骆康 , 卓冲 , 李硕硕 . 省会城市数字经济发展的影响——溢出还是虹吸[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023 , 40(15) : 53 -63 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022080661

Abstract

As the main spatial carrier of economic and social development, many cities in China have successively introduced the strategy of"strengthening provincial capitals" in recent years. Then, with the implementation of this strategy, it may bring the spillover of provincial capital city resources,promote the development of local digital economy,and also lead provincial capital cities to absorb a large amount of digital resources, forming the digital economy gap between provincial capital cities and local cities. Do provincial capitals gather digital resources because of their own advantages of economic size, population size, and capital policy, thus producing a "siphon effect" on surrounding cities; or do they make full use of their own resource sharing and joint construction mechanism to drive the economic development of surrounding local cities, and then realize rapid growth together? This problem is crucial for the implementation of the current strategy of "strengthening provincial capitals" and the coordinated development of regions.#br#There is a lack of a standard evaluation index system in the existing research, and no academic consensus on the development measurement of the digital economy. Therefore, this paper selects indicators from the perspective of output and input, constructs a theoretical model that can reveal the "spillover effect" and "siphon effect" of the development of digital economy in provincial capital cities, and effectively avoids the controversy about digital economy evaluation. In terms of the externality characteristics of the digital economy, scholars believe that the digital economy can have an impact on the surrounding areas through technology diffusion and knowledge spillover. The digital economy has promoted the flow of related labor and capital, and accelerated the formation of industrial specialization among regions. The digital economy promotes the communication between regions through mutual assistance and sharing mechanism. Therefore, this paper further tries to explain the influence of digital economy on local cities by using division of labor mechanism, learning mechanism and sharing mechanism.#br#The panel fixed model is used to study the spillover effect of digital economy development in provincial capital cities on other cities in the province based on city panel data from 2011 to 2019 . The empirical results show that (1) the development of digital economy in provincial capital cities has improved the development of digital economy in local cities, and the spillover effect is obvious, and a series of endogenous and robustness tests have confirmed this view; (2) the north-south gap between the spillover effect of digital economy in provincial capital cities is not obvious, which mainly occurs in the eastern and central regions; the spillover effect in medium-sized cities is significantly higher than that of small-size and large-size cities; (3) the spillover effect of digital economy in provincial capitals cannot be well explained by the division of labor mechanism. This spillover effect is mainly realized through the learning mechanism and partly through the sharing mechanism.#br#With a focus on the externalities of digital economy, this study firstly discusses the influence of provincial capitals on local cities from the strategy of "strengthening provincial capitals", thus expanding the new perspective of related research on digital economy. Then the labor input, capital input and income-output indicators are included to construct a theoretical model of "spillover effect" and "siphon effect" of digital economy in provincial capital cities, and it reveals the function mechanism of provincial capital cities on the development of digital economy in local cities. Thirdly since cities are the best carries for the implementation of digital economy policies, this study uses the urban panel data to explore the influence of provincial capitals on local cities, which is realistic and deepens the existing literature.#br#The results of this paper have certain guiding significance for the development of digital economy in provincial capitals. The government should adhere to the implementation of the "strengthening provincial capitals" strategy, give full play to the leading role of provincial capitals demonstration radiation. It is also essential to hold onto the principle of adapting measures to local conditions, and give full consideration to the differences in the development of digital economy in different regions. Besides the government ought to clarify the development orientation of digital economy in provincial capitals and local governments, strengthen the learning and sharing mechanism of digital economy, and build a complete industrial chain.#br#

参考文献

[1] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
[2] MARTINEZ-CARO E,CEGARRA-NAVARRO J G,ALFONSO-RUIZ F J,etal.Digital technologies and firm performance:the role of digital organisational culture[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2020,154(5):1-10.
[3] 黄赜琳,秦淑悦,张雨朦.数字经济如何驱动制造业升级[J].经济管理,2022,44(4):80-97.
[4] 许宪春,张美慧.中国数字经济规模测算研究——基于国际比较的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020,37(5):23-41.
[5] 柏培文,张云.数字经济、人口红利下降与中低技能劳动者权益[J].经济研究,2021,56(5):91-108.
[6] 王军,朱杰,罗茜.中国数字经济发展水平及演变测度[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(7):26-42.
[7] 张勋,万广华,张佳佳,等.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究,2019,54(8):71-86.
[7] 柏培文,喻理.数字经济发展与企业价格加成:理论机制与经验事实[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(11):59-77.
[9] 钱海章,陶云清,曹松威,等.中国数字金融发展与经济增长的理论与实证[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2020,37(6):26-46.
[10] 陈怀超,田晓煜,范建红.数字经济、人才数字素养与制造业结构升级的互动关系——基于省级面板数据的PVAR分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(19):49-58.
[11] 王俊豪,周晟佳.中国数字产业发展的现状、特征及其溢出效应[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(3):103-119.
[12] 赵滨元.数字经济对区域创新绩效及其空间溢出效应的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(14):37-44.
[13] 习明明,梁晴,傅钰.数字经济对城市经济增长的影响研究[J].当代财经,2022,43(9):15-27.
[14] 邓慧慧,周梦雯,程钰娇.数字经济与城市群协同发展:基于夜间灯光数据的研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,52(4):32-49.
[15] 白俊红,陈新.数字经济、空间溢出效应与区域创新效率[J/OL].研究与发展管理:1-12[2022-10-10].
[16] 柳卸林,张文逸,葛爽,等.数字化是否有利于缩小城市间发展差距——基于283个城市的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42(6):102-113.
[17] 李宗显,杨千帆.数字经济如何影响中国经济高质量发展[J].现代经济探讨,2021,40(7):10-19.
[18] 徐辉,邱晨光.数字经济发展提升了区域创新能力吗——基于长江经济带的空间计量分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(13):43-53.
[19] DURANTON G, PUGA D. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies[J].Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics,2004(4):2063-2117.
[20] 赵星,王林辉.中国城市创新集聚空间演化特征及影响因素研究[J].经济学家,2020,32(9):75-84.
[21] GORDON I R, MCCANN P. Industrial clusters:complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks[J].Urban Studies,2013,37(3):513-532.
[22] LOVELY M E, LIANG Y, ZHANG H. Economic geography and inequality in China:did improved market access widen spatial wage differences[J]. China Economic Review, 2019,54(C):306-323.
[23] 张航,丁任重.实施“强省会”战略的现实基础及其可能取向[J].改革,2020,33(8):147-158.
[24] 郭峰,王靖一,王芳,等.测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J].经济学(季刊),2020,19(4):1401-1418.
[25] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济,2019,36(8):5-23.
[26] NUNN N, QIAN N. US food aid and civil conflict[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (6): 1630-1666.
[27] GROSSMAN G M, HELPMAN H. Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002,117(1): 85-120.
[28] DURANTON G, PUGA D. From sectoral to functional urban specialisation[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2005,57(2):343-370.
[29] 刘翠花.数字经济对产业结构升级和创业增长的影响[J].中国人口科学,2022,35(2):112-125,128.
[30] 郑小碧,庞春,刘俊哲.数字经济时代的外包转型与经济高质量发展——分工演进的超边际分析[J].中国工业经济,2020,37(7):117-135.
[31] 韩璐,陈松,梁玲玲.数字经济、创新环境与城市创新能力[J].科研管理,2021,42(4):35-45.
[32] BATHELT H, MALMBERG A, MASKELL P. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(1): 31-56.
[33] 刘根荣.共享经济:传统经济模式的颠覆者[J].经济学家,2017,29(5):97-104.
文章导航

/