创新是提高综合国力和国家竞争力的重要方式，我国各级政府均高度重视并出台系列政策推动创新驱动发展。四川省承担着西部地区转型探索的重任，为全国全面创新改革试验区建设贡献了宝贵经验。从政策文本分析视角，构建政策工具—企业生命周期二维分析框架，借助NVIVO11和UCINET等软件对2012—2020年四川省颁布的82份创新政策文件进行政策内容量化分析，研究发现四川省对创新给予了全方位激励和规制，但仍然存在一些问题：政策发布数量呈现平稳到快速增长再到缓慢回落的趋势，政策效力偏低且可操作性不强；政策颁布主体虽呈现多元化态势但联系不够紧密，形成两个小群体，即以科技厅、财政厅、发改委为代表的执行主体，以及省人民政府办公厅、省委办公厅为代表的规划主体；政策工具应用存在过溢或缺失，呈现重供给、轻需求的工具偏好，政策工具作用目标取向模糊；工具应用与创新主体生命周期不匹配，工具内部结构分布不均衡。
The new round of technology revolution and industrial change is accelerating, and the subversion technology is constantly emerging. The science and technology revolution is reshaping the world competition pattern, and innovation has also become an important means to improve comprehensive national strength and national competitiveness in the era of knowledge economy. The government attaches great importance to innovation and has issued a series of promotion policies. Sichuan is the only provincial "comprehensive innovation and reform test area" in the western of China, and it is responsible for transition exploration in the western region. The innovation policies issued in Sichuan are typical and representative, and its experience is worth of exploring. However scholars have studied a large number of regional innovation policies, few of them explore the areas with rich experience in reform. Considering the limitations and urgency of the current study, this paper constructs the analysis framework based on policy tool theory, and analyzes the innovation policies issued in Sichuan province, the rationality and existing problems of Sichuan Policy Tools in order to provide references to the optimization and design of subsequent policies.#br#From the perspective of policy text, this paper constructs a two-dimensional analysis framework of policy tools and enterprise life cycle. With the help of analysis software such as NVIVO11 and UCINET, 82 innovation policies issued by Sichuan province during 2012-2020 is quantitatively analyzed. The results show that local governments have given incentives and regulations to innovation, but there are still some problems. The number of policies presents the phenomenon of stable development to rapid growth and then slow decline. Policies also have low authority and operability. Although the subject of policy promulgation presents diversified phenomenon, the connection is not close enough. There are two small groups: the executive subject represented by the Science and Technology Agency, the Department of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission, and the planning subject represented by the General Office of the People's Government and the General Office of the Provincial Party Committee. There are overspill and insufficient use of policy tools as well as the incompatibility between policy tools and enterprise life cycle. At the same time, due to the unbalanced structure of policy tools there is the overflow risk and the effect is insufficient.#br#The research shows that the government gives more consideration to policy operation and temporary implementation, and the policy stability is still insufficient. The imbalance of tool applications illustrates that the government in Sichuan province haven’t made full use of policy tools, and the overall government concept is not formed, the cooperation between government departments is also not enough, thus it’s difficult to form policy synergy. In order to cope with the problem of Sichuan policy tools in practice, government departments can consider from the following aspects. The first is to strengthen the synergy of the department, because the current policy lacks authority and operability, and there is little cooperation between different government departments. The second is to adjust the tool structure, optimize internal layout and appropriately reduce the frequency of use of supply policy tools. The government should pay attention to environmental policy tools, create a tolerant and open innovative ecological environment, break through administrative regional boundaries and promote agglomeration of resources and cross-border integration. It is suggested to apply demand-based policy tools, such as government procurement, trade control and consumer subsidies. The last is to strengthen the matching of policy tools and life cycles. The development of innovation is continuous, and the application of policy tools must match life cycle rules, and the policy tools should be reasonably applied in each link to avoid waste of resources.#br#
[1] COOKE P.Regional innovation systems，clusters，and theknowledge economy[J].Industrial and Corporate Change，2001，10 (4):945-974.
[2] 郄海拓,张志娟.基于文本挖掘的我国科技创新政策量化评价研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望，2020,35(6):53-60，76.
[3] CHIARA ELEONORA DE MARCO,IRENE MARTELLI,ALBERTO DI MININ. European SMEs′ engagement in open innovation when the important thing is to win and not just to participate, what should innovation policy do[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2020,15(6):15-26.
[4] SCHOT J.Transforming innovation policy，keynote address at edges， horizons and transformations:the future of innovation policy[R].The Royal Society of Art，2014.
[5] CHRISTIAN FRIIS,CHARLIE KARLSSON,THOMASPAULSSON. Relating entrepreneurship to economic growth[J]. Advances in Spatial Science, 2006,20(5):60-75.
[6] HADDAD CHRISTIAN,BENNER MAXIMILIAN. Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: a research agenda for context sensitivity[J]. Research Policy,2021,50(7):56-72.
[7] HAHN K. Innovation in times of financialization: do future-oriented innovation strategies suffer[J].Research Policy，2019，48(4)：923-935.
[8] 谢青,田志龙.创新政策如何推动我国新能源汽车产业的发展——基于政策工具与创新价值链的政策文本分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(6):3-14.
[9] YUAN XIAODONG,LI XIAOTAO. The evolution of the industrial value chain in China's high-speed rail driven by innovation policies: a patent analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2021,16(7):78-90.
[10] CUNNINGHAM P N，CRASEMANN W，LEHTO P，et al. Peer-review of the Danish research and innovation system: strengthening innovation performance[R].Expert Group Report Prepared for the European Research Area Committee，2012.
[11] EDQUIST C.Towards a holistic innovation policy:can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model[J].Research Policy，2019，48(4):869-879.
[12] 陈强远,林思彤,张醒.中国技术创新激励政策：激励了数量还是质量[J].中国工业经济，2020，38(4)：79-96.
[13] 张赫,刘桂芝.科技创新人才培养中的政策工具选择与配置——基于中央及各部委政策的内容分析[J].延边大学学报(社会科学版),2021,54(4):103-111,143.
[14] BORRAS S， EDQUIST C. Holistic innovation policy: theoretical foundations， policy problems， and instrument choices[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press，2019.
[15] BOZEMAN B， LINK A N. Toward an assessment of impacts from US technology and innovation policies[J].Science and Public Policy，2015，42(3):369-376.
[16] 威廉·邓恩.公共政策分析导论[M].第2版.谢明，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2002：1-90.
[17] 陈振明.公共政策学——政策分析的理论、方法和技术[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2004：1-85.
[18] TODTLING F，TRIPPL M.One size fits all：towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach[J].Research Policy，2005，34(8):1203-1219.
[19] 刘凤朝，孙玉涛，刘萍萍.中央与地方政府财政科技投入结构分析[J].中国科技论坛，2007，23(10):65-68.
[20] MARZUCCHI A, ANTONIOLI D，MONTRESOR S.Industry-research co-operation within and across regional boundaries： what does innovation policy add[J]. Papers in Regional Science，2015，94(3):499-524.
[21] 盛亚，陈剑平.区域创新政策中利益相关者的量化分析[J].科研管理，2013，34(6):25-33.
[22] AMANKWAH-AMOAH J.The evolution of science，technology and innovation policies: a review of the Ghanaian experience[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change，2016，110(6): 134-142.
[23] ROLFSTAM M.Public procurement as an innovation policy tool:the role of institutions [J].Science& Public Policy，2009，36(5):349-360.
[24] 任爱莲,任麟韵,秦俊文.河南省创新政策执行效果评价及优化路径研究[J].创新科技，2019,19(12) ：28-38.
[25] 唐五湘，饶彩霞，程桂枝.北京市科技金融政策文本量化分析[J].科技进步与对策，2013，30(18):56-61.
[26] 袭著燕,赵慧,张弛.基于统计数据的山东科技创新政策实施效果评估分析[J].科技和产业，2014,14(11):99-103.
[27] PETR P，BOLESLAW DOMANSKI，ROBERT GUZIK. Industrial upgrading throughforeigndirect investment in central European automotive manufacturing[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies，2009，20(15)：120-133.
[28] GIFFORD ETHAN,MCKELVEY MAUREEN,SAEMUNDSSON ROGNVALDUR. The evolution of knowledge-intensive innovation ecosystems: co-evolving entrepreneurial activity and innovation policy in the West Swedish maritime system[J]. Industry and Innovation,2021,28(5)：15-26.
[29] 谭海波,郑清清,王海函.地方政府大数据产业政策:工具偏好及其匹配——基于贵州省政策文本的分析[J].中国行政管理,2021(1):52-58.
[30] M HOWLETT. Policy instruments，policy styles，andpolicy implementation：national approaches to theories of instrument choice[J]. Policy Studies Journal，1991(2)：1-21.
[31] OWEN E HUGHES. Public management and administration：an introduction[M]. Beijing：Renmin University of China Press，2004：1-120.
[32] 陈振明.政策科学——公共政策分析导论[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2003:1-89.
[33] 黄新平,黄萃,苏竣.基于政策工具的我国科技金融发展政策文本量化研究[J].情报杂志，2020,39(1):130-137.
[34] MCDONNELL L M，ELMORE R F.Alternative policy instruments[J].Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，1987(2)：133-152.
[35] SCHNEIDER A，INGRAM H.Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J].The Journal of Politics，1990，52(2)：510-529.
[36] HOWLETT M，RAMESH M，PERL A.Studying public policy：policy cycles and policy subsystems[M].Oxford：Oxford University Press，2003：92-100.
[37] ROTHWELL R，ZEGVELD W.An assessment of government innovation policies[J].Review of Policy Research，1984，3(3): 436-444.
[38] 赵筱媛,苏竣.基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J].科学学研究，2007,25(1):52-56.
[39] FLANAGAN K, UYARRA E, LARANJA M. Reconceptualising the policy mix for innovation[J]. Research Policy,2011,40(5):702-713.
[40] ADIZES,ICHAK. Organizational passage: diagnosing and treating life cycle problem of organizations[J].Organizational Dynamics,1979,8(1):3-25.
[41] 约瑟夫·阿洛伊斯·熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990:1-45.
[42] 李业.企业生命周期的修正模型及思考[J].南方经济,2000,18(2):47-50.
[43] SMITHS K G. Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational lifecycle[J].Academy of Management Journal,1999,28(4):799-820.
[44] 李云鹤，李湛，唐松莲.企业生命周期、公司治理与公司资本配置效率[J].南开管理评论，2011，14(3)：110-121.
公众号
订阅号
企业微信客服
鄂公网安备 42010602003780号