科技管理创新

环境不确定情境下组织韧性影响路径、作用机制与应对策略研究

  • 张公一 ,
  • 张畅 ,
  • 刘思雯
展开
  • (吉林大学 管理学院,吉林 长春 130022)
张公一(1982—),男,吉林松原人,博士,吉林大学管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为战略管理、数字经济;张畅(1994—),女,吉林长春人,吉林大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为战略管理;刘思雯(1999—),女,黑龙江牡丹江人,吉林大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为战略管理。

收稿日期: 2021-11-16

  修回日期: 2022-01-08

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(72172052);吉林大学研究生创新研究计划项目(101832020CX061)

The Influence Path, Action Mechanism and Coping Solution of Organizational Resilience under Uncertain Environment

  • Zhang Gongyi ,
  • Zhang Chang ,
  • Liu Siwen
Expand
  • (School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

Received date: 2021-11-16

  Revised date: 2022-01-08

  Online published: 2023-02-14

摘要

韧性作为探究组织—环境互动机理的方法,有助于企业在逆境中化危为机、借机成势。基于过程视角,打开环境不确定情境下组织韧性响应的“黑箱”,构建“暴露期(激活韧性)—发展期(调动韧性)—恢复期(发挥韧性)”研究框架。研究发现:环境作为企业的信息源和资源池,不确定性通过信息认知和资源依赖两条路径影响组织韧性;为应对环境不确定性,组织韧性通过探测机制和缓冲机制降低信息模糊,进而突破资源瓶颈。因此,应综合判断企业外部环境状况和组织自身禀赋,选择适应、更新和突破3种组织韧性应对策略。

本文引用格式

张公一 , 张畅 , 刘思雯 . 环境不确定情境下组织韧性影响路径、作用机制与应对策略研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023 , 40(2) : 20 -29 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021110463

Abstract

Enterprises have to respond fast to environmental changes and uncertainties, generate strategic choices accordingly and effectively implement strategies faster than competitors, so as to obtain sustainable competitive advantage. This is precisely the essence of resilience. As a method to explore the mechanism of organization-environment interaction, organizational resilience helps enterprises to turn risks into opportunities and take advantage of opportunities against environmental uncertainties. Existing researches provide relatively clear answers to the two key questions of "how to build a resilient organization" and "why to build a resilient organization". However, there is a lack of in-depth and systematic understanding of the link between antecedents and consequences, and thus the black box of the interaction mechanism between enterprises and the environment in uncertain situations waits for further exploration.#br#In response to the above problems, this paper is devoted tostudying the process mechanism of organizational resilience in the context of environmental uncertainty from the process perspective, and constructs a research framework of exposure period: activate resilience—development period: mobilize resilience—recovery period: exert resilience. This research framework starts from identifying the impact of environmental uncertainty. Then it explores the dual-action mechanism of organizational resilience, and finally explains the differences of resilient coping strategies.#br#First of all, the environment is the information source and resource pool of enterprises. When the first sign of uncertainty appear, environmental uncertainty can affect organizational resilience along the two paths of information cognition and resource dependence in the uncertainty exposure period. The former is information-centric,andincomplete, untimely and unclear information will affect the enterprise's acquisition of key information, which in turn affects the comprehensiveness, speed and effectiveness of the enterprise's resilient response. The latter is resource-centric, and the dependence of enterprises on external key tangible and intangible resources will affect the supply adequacy and demand satisfaction, which in turn affect the resource mobilization ability of the enterprise′s resilient response. Second, when the impact of uncertainty spreads, enterprises can mobilize resilience through the detection mechanism and the buffer mechanism to reduce information ambiguity and break through resource bottlenecks in the uncertainty development period. The detection mechanism helps enterprises analyze the information of the real world to understand the current complex situation, and its role is to build the cognitive foundation of organizational resilience from individual, organizational and environmental factors. The buffer mechanism helps enterprises to allocate and reorganize internal and external resources to create a resource buffer pool to reduce the impact of disturbance and alleviate the dilemma of resource acquisition at this stage. Finally, when the uncertainty development trend becomes traceable, the coping strategies of organizational resilience in the uncertainty recovery period include adaptation, renewal and breakthrough. The adaptation strategy focuses on expanding the original core expertise businesses, and is committed to excellence in order to survive the disturbance. The renewal strategy focuses on exploring new value growth businesses, and is committed to innovating in order to thrive in an ambiguous future. The breakthrough strategy emphasizes that enterprises should become masters of dual business model against environmental uncertainty, and devote themselves to pursuing sustainable competitive advantages.#br#In summary, this paper attempts to open the black box of the interaction between organizational resilience and environmental uncertainty. Theoretically, it constructs a research framework of exposure period—development period—recovery period. In addition, focusing on the two main lines of information and resources, enterprises can identify the paths through which environmental uncertainty affects organizational resilience, and further improve relevant research results in the context of organizational resilience. Furthermore, on the basis of understanding the impact of environmental uncertainty, this paper deconstructs how the multi-level elements of individuals, organizations, and environments contribute to the construction of a cognitive-resource dual resilience foundation, so as to activate the detection mechanism and the buffer mechanism, and further promotes the exploration of organizational resilience action dimensions. In practice, the clarity of information orientation and resource orientation provide enterprises with ideas and countermeasures to recognize and deal with the impact of environmental uncertainty. Moreover, enterprises can choose coping strategies based on the external environment and their own endowments,andthus this study provides knowledge support for practitioners to cultivate and develop organizational resilience, which is of great practical significance for coping with the negative economic impacts of COVID-19.#br#

参考文献

[1] HAMEL G, VLIKANGAS L. The quest for resilience[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2003,81(9):52-63.
[2] MEYER A D. Adapting to environmental jolts[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982,27(4):515-537.
[3] TASIC J, AMIR S, TAN J, et al. A multilevel framework to enhance organizational resilience[J]. Journal of Risk Research, 2020,23(6):713-738.
[4] 褚晓波, 高闯. 国外组织韧性的研究现状:一项文献综述[J]. 南大商学评论, 2020,17(4):153-181.
[5] 李平, 竺家哲. 组织韧性:最新文献评述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021,43(3):25-41.
[6] 王勇. 组织韧性、战略能力与新创企业成长关系研究[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2019,41(1):68-77.
[7] KIM Y. Organizational resilience and employee work-role performance after a crisis situation: exploring the effects of organizational resilience on internal crisis communication[J]. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2020,32(1-2):47-75.
[8] CARMELI A, MARKMAN G D. Capture, governance, and resilience: strategy implications from the history of Rome[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011,32(3):322-341.
[9] PATRIARCA R, DI GRAVIO G, COSTANTINO F, et al. An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience[J]. Safety and Health at Work, 2018,9(3):265-276.
[10] SAHEBJAMNIA N, TORABI S A, MANSOURI S A. Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018,197:63-83.
[11] DESJARDINE M, BANSAL P, YANG Y. Bouncing back: building resilience through social and environmental practices in the context of the 2008 global financial crisis[J]. Journal of Management, 2019,45(4):1434-1460.
[12] CARVALLO A, AREAL N. Great places to work: resilience in times of crisis[J]. Human Resource Management, 2016,55(3):479-498.
[13] YBARRA N. Hurricane harvey: one hospital′s journey toward organizational resilience[J]. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 2019,33(3):246-252.
[14] LIANG F, CAO L. Linking employee resilience with organizational resilience: the roles of coping mechanism and managerial resilience[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2021,14:1063-1075.
[15] LIMNIOS E A M, MAZZAROL T, GHADOUANI A, et al. The resilience architecture framework: four organizational archetypes[J]. European Management Journal, 2014,32(1):104-116.
[16] RUIZ-MARTIN C, LOPEZ-PAREDES A, WAINER G. What we know and do not know about organizational resilience[J]. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 2018,6(1):11-28.
[17] DARKOW P M. Beyond "bouncing back": towards an integral, capability-based understanding of organizational resilience[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2019,27(2):145-156.
[18] 张秀娥, 滕欣宇. 组织韧性内涵、维度及测量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021,38(10):9-17.
[19] 张公一, 张畅, 刘晚晴. 化危为安:组织韧性研究述评与展望[J]. 经济管理, 2020,42(10):192-208.
[20] CONZ E, MAGNANI G. A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: a systematic literature review and a framework for future research[J]. European Management Journal, 2020,38(3):400-412.
[21] DUCHEK S. Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization[J]. Business Research, 2020,13(1):215-246.
[22] 马浩. 组织韧性的机制与过程[J]. 清华管理评论, 2020,11(6):84-89.
[23] DIEP N S, DIEP L T, HANH M T H, et al. Enhancing resilience in the Covid-19 crisis: lessons from human resource management practices in Vietnam[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2021,24(22):3189-3205.
[24] SARKAR S, CLEGG S R. Resilience in a time of contagion: lessons from small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Journal of Change Management, 2021,21(2):242-267.
[25] GUNDERSON L H, HOLLING C S. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2002.
[26] 郭捷, 杨立成, 孙子旭. 基于科技视角与双周期模型的我国突发事件危机管理研究——以新型冠状病毒危机事件为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020,37(14):8-13.
[27] 陈春花, 宋一晓, 朱丽. 不确定性环境下组织转型的4个关键环节——基于新希望六和股份有限公司的案例分析[J]. 管理学报, 2018,15(1):1-10.
[28] 樊建锋, 盛安芳, 赵辉. 效果逻辑与因果逻辑:两类中小企业创业者的再验证——环境不确定性感知与创业自我效能感的调节效应[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021,38(7):38-47.
[29] 李大元. 企业环境不确定性研究及其新进展[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(11):81-87.
[30] ISHAK A W, WILLIAMS E A. A dynamic model of organizational resilience: adaptive and anchored approaches[J]. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2018,23(2):180-196.
[31] 汤敏, 李仕明, 刘斌. 突发灾害背景下组织韧性及其演化——东方汽轮机有限公司应对“5·12”汶川地震与恢复重建的案例研究[J]. 技术经济, 2019,38(1):28-37.
[32] DEWALD J, BOWEN F. Storm clouds and silver linings: responding to disruptive innovations through cognitive resilience[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010,34(1):197-218.
[33] KAHN W A, BARTON M A, FISHER C M, et al. The geography of strain: organizational resilience as a function of intergroup relations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2018,43(3):509-529.
[34] LENGNICK-HALL C A, BECK T E. Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: how organizations respond to environmental change[J]. Journal of Management, 2005,31(5):738-757.
[35] ORTIZ-DE-MANDOJANA N, BANSAL P. The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016,37(8):1615-1631.
[36] RAHI K. Indicators to assess organizational resilience-a review of empirical literature[J]. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2019,10(2/3):85-98.
[37] BARASA E, MBAU R, GILSON L. What is resilience and how can it be nurtureda systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience[J]. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2018,7(6):491-503.
[38] 贾明, 向翼, 张喆. 企业社会责任与组织韧性[J]. 管理学季刊, 2020,5(3):25-39.
[39] 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 等. 数智赋能:危机情境下组织韧性如何形成——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021,37(3):84-104.
[40] QUENDLER E. Organisational resilience: building business value in a changing world[J]. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 2017,10(2):101-119.
文章导航

/