人才与教育

团队信任对威权型领导涌现的作用机制——基于心理距离视角

  • 张少峰 ,
  • 王肖宇 ,
  • 程德俊 ,
  • 黄庆
展开
  • (南京大学 管理学院, 江苏 南京 210093)
张少峰(1989-) ,男,安徽合肥人,南京大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为战略人力资源管理; 王肖宇(1997-),女,河南周口人,南京大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为战略人力资源管理; 程德俊(1976-),男,江苏泰州人,博士,南京大学管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向 为战略人力资源管理; 黄庆(1992-),女,重庆人,南京大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为组织行为学。

收稿日期: 2019-12-19

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-17

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目(71832006,71732002);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572077)

The Mechanism of Organizational Trust on the Emergence of Authoritarian Leadership in Creative Teams

  • Zhang Shaofeng ,
  • Wang Xiaoyu ,
  • Cheng Dejun ,
  • Huang Qing
Expand
  • (School of Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

Received date: 2019-12-19

  Online published: 2020-08-17

摘要

目前关于团队领导力涌现的研究大多集中于领导者个体特质,忽略了团队内部环境对领导力涌现的影响。威权型领导作为我国企业普遍存在的一种领导方式,在实施过程中取得了一定成效,但也暴露出一些弊端,因此深入探讨威权型领导涌现机制对我国企业管理具有现实意义。以华东地区某优秀大型文化企业29个项目团队的配对数据为样本,采用层级回归分析,从团队层面探讨了信任对威权型领导涌现的影响机制。研究发现,身份信任会抑制威权型领导涌现,威胁信任会促进威权型领导涌现;心理距离在团队信任与威权型领导间起中介作用;团队信任对心理距离的影响受到权力距离的调节,当权力距离较大时,威胁信任对扩大团队心理距离的作用增强,而身份信任对缩短团队心理距离的作用减弱。

本文引用格式

张少峰 , 王肖宇 , 程德俊 , 黄庆 . 团队信任对威权型领导涌现的作用机制——基于心理距离视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020 , 37(15) : 89 -96 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2019080513

Abstract

At present, most researches on leadership emergence focus on the personal characteristics of leaders, ignoring the influence of environment and culture on leadership emergence in organizations. Authoritarian Leadership, as a common way of leadership in Chinese enterprises, has made some achievements in the implementation process, but also exposed some shortcomings. It is of practical significance to explore the emergence mechanism of authoritarian leadership. In this study, paired data of 29 project teams of an excellent large cultural enterprise in east China were taken as samples. Through hierarchical regression analysis, the influence mechanism of organizational trust on the emergence of Authoritarian Leadership was discussed from the organizational level. It is found that identity trust can inhibit the emergence of Authoritarian Leadership, while threat to trust can promote the emergence of Authoritarian Leadership. Organizational psychological distance plays an intermediary role between organizational trust and Authoritarian Leadership. The influence of organizational trust on organizational psychological distance is regulated by organizational power distance: when the organizational power distance is high, the enhancing effect of threat trust on organizational psychological distance will be enhanced, while the decreasing effect of identity trust on organizational psychological distance will be weakened.

参考文献

[1] 陈永霞,贾良定,李超平,等.变革型领导、心理授权与员工的团队承诺:中国情景下的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006(1):96-105+144.
[2] 张鹏程,刘文兴,廖建桥.魅力型领导对员工创造力的影响机制:仅有心理安全足够吗[J].管理世界,2011(10):94-107.
[3] 方阳春.包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响——基于员工自我效能感的中介作用[J].科研管理,2014,35(5):152-160.
[4] 陈维政,忻蓉,王安逸.企业文化与领导风格的协同性实证研究[J].管理世界,2004(2):75-83+155-156.
[5] 朱天一.领导风格与员工工作满意的关系——团队公平认知为中介效果的研究[J].经济管理,2012,34(6):54-64.
[6] FARH J L, CHENG B S. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations[M]. Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000.
[7] SILIN R F. Leadership and values[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.
[8] 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 樊景立. 家长式领导:三元模式的建构与测量[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000(14):3-64.
[9] 邱功英,龙立荣.威权领导与下属建言的关系:一个跨层分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(10):86-93.
[10] 李锐,田晓明.主管威权领导与下属前瞻行为:一个被中介的调节模型构建与检验[J].心理学报,2014,46(11):1719-1733.
[11] 刘冰,齐蕾,徐璐.棍棒之下出“孝子”吗——员工职场偏差行为研究[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(3):182-192.
[12] 蒿坡,陈琇霖,龙立荣.领导力涌现研究综述与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2017,39(9):47-58.
[13] FOTI R J, HAUENSTEIN N M A. Pattern and variable approaches in leadership emergence and effectiveness[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(2):347-355.
[14] LEWICKI R J, TOMLINSON E C, GILLESPIE N. Models of interpersonal trust development: theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(6):991-1022.
[15] SALZMANN J, GRASHA A F. Psychological size and psychological distance in manager subordinate relationships[J]. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1991, 131(5):629-646.
[16] 王丽平, 于志川, 王淑华. 心理距离对知识共享行为的影响研究——基于团队支持感的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013(9):37-45.
[17] HOFSTEDE G. Motivation, leadership and organization: do American theories apply abroad[J].Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 9(1):42-63.
[18] DORFMAN P W, HOWELL J P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: hofstede revisited[J]. Advances in International Comparative Management, 1988, 3: 127-150.
[19] CARSON J B, TESLUK P E, MARRONE J A. Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50: 1217-1234.
[20] DERUE D S, NAHRGANG J D, WELLMAN N, et al. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64: 7-52.
[21] WANG D, WALDMAN D A, ZHANG Z. A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, 99: 181-198.
[22] DRISCOLL J W. Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21(1):44-56.
[23] MISHRA J, MORRISSEY M A. Trust in employee/employer relationships: a survey of west Michigan managers[J]. Public Personnel Management, 1990, 19(4):443-486.
[24] WELLMAN N.Authority or community? a relational models theory of group-level leadership emergence[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2017, 42: 596-617.
[25] FISKE A P. The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations[J]. Psychological Review, 1992, 99: 689-723.
[26] FISKE A P, HASLAM N. Social cognition is thinking about relationships[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1996, 5(5):143-148.
[27] VAHLNE J E, WIEDERSHEIM-PAULF. Economic distance: model and empirical investigation[C].HORNELL E, VAHLNE J E, WIEDERSHEIM-PAUL F. Export and Foreign Establishments[M]. Uppsala, 1973: 81-159.
[28] KOGUT B, SINGH H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, 19(3): 411-432.
[29] O'GRADY S, LANE H. The psychic distance paradox[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1996, 27(2): 309-333.
[30] BOGARDUS E S.Occupational distance[J].Sociology and Social Research, 1928, 13: 73-81.
[31] FRANK A W. Social distance[J]. Encyclopedia of Sociology Guilford, 1974, 269-270.
[32] 廖建桥, 赵君, 张永军. 权力距离对中国领导行为的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(7):988-992.
[33] 梁建. 道德领导与员工建言: 一个调节—中介模型的构建与检验[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2):252-264.
[34] HACKMAN J R. The design of work teams[J]. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987, 35(11):299-301.
[35] PECKHAM, MIKE. Teams: wrong box, wrong time[J]. Management Development Review, 1996, 9(4):26-28.
[36] RANK J,PACE V L,FRESE M.Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative[J]. Applied Psychology, 2004, 53(4):518-528.
[37] EARLEY P C, EREZ M. The transplanted executive: why you need to understand how workers in other countries see the world differently[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[38] KIRKMAN B L, CHEN G, FARH J L, et al. Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders:a cross- level,cross- cultural examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52:744-764.
[39] JOHNS G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31: 386-408.
[40] JUDGE T A, BONO J E, ILIES R, et al. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87: 765-780.
[41] 刘冰, 许骁, 徐璐. 威权领导与员工主动性行为:一个跨层次研究[J]. 预测, 2017(3):8-13.
[42] CHEN T T, LEUNG K. Structuring versus autocraticness:a comprehensive model of authoritarian eadership[C]. The meeting of the International Association for Chinese Management Research, Hong Kong, China, 2012.
文章导航

/