企业创新管理

集群企业转型升级资源需求差异性分析

  • 崔祥民
展开
  • 1.江苏科技大学 公共管理学院,江苏 镇江 212003;2.南京大学 商学院,江苏 南京 210098
崔祥民(1977-),男,江苏丰县人,江苏科技大学公共管理学院副教授,南京大学商学院博士后,研究方向为创业管理与人力资源管理。

收稿日期: 2016-07-07

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-01

基金资助

镇江市软科学项目(RK2015009)

The Analysis on Cluster Enterprise Transformation and Upgrading of Resource Demand Differences

  • Cui Xiangmin
Expand
  • 1.School of Public Administration, Jiangsu Science and Technology University, Zhenjiang 212003;School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,China

Received date: 2016-07-07

  Online published: 2017-03-01

摘要

资源是集群企业转型升级的基础。从资源禀赋视角出发,研究了集群企业转型升级的资源结构,从类型和规模两个视角分析了集群企业转型升级资源需求的差异性。研究发现,集群企业转型升级所需资源由市场资源、技术资源、金融资源和人力资源构成;购买者驱动型产业集群企业对市场资源需求明显高于生产者驱动型产业集群企业,生产者驱动型产业集群企业技术资源需求明显高于购买者驱动型产业集群;不同规模集群企业资源需求呈现“倒U”现象,中型企业资源需求明显高于小型企业和大型企业。

本文引用格式

崔祥民 . 集群企业转型升级资源需求差异性分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017 , 34(4) : 111 -114 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016060118

Abstract

Resource is the basis of the transformation and upgrading of enterprises cluster. Made an research on Resource structure of cluster enterprise transformation and upgrading in the view of perspective of resource endowment, differentiate the resource demand of cluster enterprises in different type and size. The results shows that: cluster enterprises transformation and upgrading resources composed of market resources, technical resources, financial resources and human resources; the market resource requirement in buyer-driven industry cluster enterprises is higher than that of the producer-driven enterprises in industrial clusters, the producer-driven industry set group enterprise technical resources demand was significantly higher than that of the buyer driven industry clusters; resources demanded by cluster enterprise in different scale presented "inverted U" phenomenon, medium-sized enterprise resource demand was significantly higher than that of small and large firms.

参考文献

[1]周海波,胡汉辉.知识演化视角下产业集群升级模式对于创新绩效的影响分析[J].中国科技论坛,2015(11):41-46.
[2]HUMPHREY J, SCHMITZ H.Developing country firms in the world economy:governance and upgrading in global value chains[R].The Output of the Joint IDS-INEF Project,2002:210-220.
[3]胡大立.我国产业集群全球价值链“低端锁定”战略风险及转型升级路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016(3).
[4]郑 准,文连阳,庞俊亭.我国产业集群双重锁定的形成机理与突破策略[J].经济地理,2014(11):101-106.
[5]李宇,张福珍,郭庆磊.区域创新型产业集群的网络创新机制与引导策略[J].宏观经济研究,2015(9):98-107.
[6]杨继军,范从来.刘易斯拐点、比较优势蝶化与中国外贸发展方式的选择[J].经济学家,2012(2):22-29 [7]林毅夫.新结构经济学:反思经济发展与政策的理论框架[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[8]ROMER P M.Endogenous technological change[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(5):71-102.
[9]SCHILLING M A.Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets:the impact of learning orientation,timing,and network externalities [J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45 (2):387-398.
[10]GEORGE G,ZAHRA S A,WOOD D R.The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance:a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies [J].Journal of Business Venturing,2002(17):577-609.
[11]LAMBE C J,SPEKMAN R E.Alliances,external technology acquisition,and discontinuous technology change [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management ,1997,14 (2):102-116.
[12]何磊.资本市场与陕西产业结构转型升级相关性研究[J].现代商业,2016(4):84-86.
文章导航

/