|
|
|
| The Extraterritorial Application System of American Patent Law: Evolution, Application and Enlightenment |
| Shan Juan1,2 |
| （1.School of Law，Jilin University，Changchun 130012，China；2.College of Humanity and Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology，Qingdao 266510，China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Patent right is considered to be the most territorial right. For a long time, domestic legislation and international treaties on patent protection have broken through the regionality of patent rights. With the deepening of globalization and the regional contradiction of patent rights, with the lobbying of the US patentees, the US Congress has constantly revised the patent law to give some rules extraterritorial effect to regulate overseas activities such as overseas assembly and overseas manufacturing. At the same time, the US courts show uncertainty on the boundaries and scope of these rules in judicial practice. But generally speaking, the practice of these rules has further realized the dual functions of the patentee's rights protection and competition in the United States, and played an important role in both patent innovation and national interests. China is in a special period of transformation from a major power of patent introduction to a big country of patent creation. In legislation, we should take precautions to establish appropriate extraterritorial rules to protect patent rights in line with China's reality. At the same time, we should pay attention to actively mobilize private initiative and play the positive role of the court.
|
|
Received: 15 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] CHISUM D S.Normative and empirical territoriality in intellectual property: lessons from patent law[J]. Virginia Journal of International Law,1997,37(2):603-618.[2] HOLBROOK TIMOTHY R.Boundaries, extraterritoriality, and patent infringement damages[J]. Notre Dame Law Review, 2017,92(4):1745-1794.[3] 习近平.全面加强知识产权保护工作 激发创新活力推动构建新发展格局[EB/OL]. [2020-12-01].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-01/31/content_5583920.htm.[4] 宋紫峰.全球产业分工格局:未来走势及中国位势[J].国家治理,2018,23(6): 26-33.[5] 廖诗评.国内法域外适用及其应对[J].环球法律评论,2019,41(3):20-38.[6] 吕岩峰.知识产权之冲突法评论[J].法制与社会发展,1996,12(6):52-60.[7] 费艳颖.“专利权的地域性”评析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,28(1):88-92.[8] BEN-ATAR DORON S. Trade secrets: intellectual piracy and the origins of american industrial power[M].Yale University Press,2004:312-315.[9] CHRISTOPHER MAY,SUSAN K SELL.Intellectual property rights: a critical history[M].Lynne Rienner, 2006:111.[10] 温军,张森.专利、技术创新与经济增长——一个综述[J].华东经济管理,2019,33(8):152-160.[11] 方磊.论知识产权的地域性特征和国际化保护——以《保护工业产权巴黎公约》为视角[J].华东经济管理,2006，31(8):53-55.[12] 佘力焓.技术创新国际化视阈下专利审查协作机制创新及中国路径选择[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(1):17-21.[13] 韩永红.美国法域外适用的司法实践及中国应对[J].环球法律评论,2020,42(4):166-177.[14] KERNS, ANDREW S. Fight or flight: traversing the extraterritorial battlefield of modern United States patent law[J]. Baylor Law Review,2011,63(2):462-497.[15] 蔡从燕.中国崛起、对外关系法与法院的功能再造[J].武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2018,71（5）：130-143.[16] MARKETA TRIMBLE. The territorial discrepancy between intellectual property rights infringement claims and remedies[J]. Lewis & Clark Law Review,2019,23(2):501-552[17] 赵雷.美国法中涉外专利之诉的法律适用与执行——基于管辖与禁令执行的分析[J].知识产权，2018，204(2):90-96.[18] HOLBROOK TIMOTHY R. What counts as extraterritorial in patent law[J].Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law,2019,25(2):291-314.[19] 霍政欣.国内法的域外效力:美国机制、学理解构与中国路径[J].政法论坛,2020,38(2):174-191.[20] 朱巧慧.美国反域外适用推定原则[D].苏州：苏州大学,2019.[21] WASSERMAN, MELISSA FEENEY. Divided infringement: expanding the extraterritorial scope of patent law[J]. New York University Law Review,2007,82(4): 281-309.[22] HOLBROOK TIMOTHY R. Extraterritoriality in U.S. patent law[J]. William and Mary Law Review,2008,49(6):2119-2192.[23] WASSERMAN M . Divided infringement: expanding the extraterritorial scope of patent law[J].New York University Law Review,2007,82(1):281-310.[24] PIERSON R W. Extraterritorial reach of U.S. patent law: has the federal circuit gone too far, fordham intellectual property[J].Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 2007,17(3):651-692.[25] 林超,张建纲,高东辉,等.知识产权已成为市场竞争新方式[J].纺织科学研究,2018，35(1):14-16.[26] 彼得·达沃豪斯.信息封建主义[M].北京：知识产权出版社,2005：189.[27] 杨宇静.中国清洁能源涉外知识产权诉讼的特点与趋势——兼论美国超导诉中国华锐风电案[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(3):143-148.[28] GEVURTZ, FRANKLIN A. Determining extraterritoriality[J]. William & Mary Law Review, 2014,56(2):341-407.[29] DARIUSH KEYHANI. U.S. patent law and extraterritorial reach[J].Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2005,51(7):51-70.[30] 李玲娟,温珂.新形势下我国知识产权全球治理环境挑战与对策建议[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(8):847-855.[31] 齐荣坤,张谦明.企业专利法律风险及有效防范的预警机制[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(6):143-146.[32] 何华.“中美知识产权第一案”述评与启示[J].法商研究,2007,24(6):9-16.[33] 全国首单知识产权海外侵权保险落地广州黄埔[EB/OL].（2020-05-14）[2020-12-01]. http://www.chinanews.com/cj/2020/05-14/9184396.shtml.[34] 吴汉东.中国知识产权法律变迁的基本面向[J].中国社会科学,2018(8):108-125, 206-207.[35] 沈红雨.我国法的域外适用法律体系构建与涉外民商事诉讼管辖权制度的改革[J].中国应用法学,2020,23(5):114-128.[36] 肖永平，焦小丁.从司法视角看中国法域外适用体系的构建[J].中国应用法学,2020,23(5):56-72. |
|
|
|
