|
|
|
| The Impact of Transboundary Ambidextrous Search on Ambidextrous Innovation Performance:Based on the Integrated Perspective of Knowledge Cooperation Chain and Strategic Flexibility |
| Dong Yuanyuan,Wei Zepeng |
| (School of Economics and Management，Harbin University of Science and Technology，Harbin 150080，China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Transboundary search can improve the knowledge reserves of enterprises and drive innovation and development. Based on the open innovation theory, knowledge management theory and dynamic capability theory, this research incorporates the knowledge cooperation chain and strategic flexibility into the transboundary search cooperation research framework, constructs and empirically tests a regulated mediation effect model. The results show that: technical knowledge search has a significant positive impact on breakthrough innovation performance, market knowledge search has a significant positive impact on incremental innovation performance; Enterprise transboundary ambidextrous search significantly positively affects the knowledge cooperation chain; Knowledge fusion and knowledge transformation have a significant intermediary effect between transboundary ambidextrous search and ambidextrous innovation performance; Strategic flexibility positively regulates the relationship between transboundary search and the knowledge cooperation chain. The article has completely revealed the mechanism of transboundary ambidextrous search on ambidextrous innovation performance, and provided theoretical guidance for companies to break through the dilemma of transboundary cooperation, promote knowledge exchange, and improve innovation performance.
|
|
Received: 29 March 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] ENKEL E, HEIL S. Preparing for distant collaboration:antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovation[J]. Technovation, 2014, 34(4):242-260.[2] BRISCOE F ROGAN M. Coordinating complex work: knowledge networks, partner departures, and client relationship performance in a law firm[J]. Management Science,2016,62(8): 2392-2411.[3] 付丙海,谢富纪,韩雨卿.创新链资源整合、双元性创新与创新绩效:基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2015，30(12):176-186.[4] WU J WU.Local and international knowledge search and product innovation: the moderating role of technology boundary spanning[J].International Business Review,2014,23(3):542- 551．[5] 王娟茹,杨苗苗,李正锋.跨界搜索、知识整合与突破性创新[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(3):111-122.[6] 梁阜,张志鑫.外部知识搜索及其双元性的创新效应研究[J].情报杂志,2019,38(1):171-179，186.[7] 胡保亮,方刚.网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究——基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):18-26.[8] 芮正云,罗瑾琏,甘静娴.新创企业创新困境突破:外部搜寻双元性及其与企业知识基础的匹配[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(5):155-164.[9] 唐源,邵云飞,陈一君.跨界行为、知识整合能力对企业创新绩效的影响研究:基于知识获取和资源损耗的作用[J].预测,2020,39(4):31-37.[10] 杨卓尔,高山行.战略柔性在分维度企业家导向与原始性创新的中介作用[J].管理评论,2020,32(3):136-151.[11] 余义勇,杨忠.团队领导跨界行为如何影响团队创造力—基于知识整合和团队氛围的整合视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(12):129-144.[12] CORREA J A, MARCUS A, HURTADO N.The natural environmental strategies of international firms:controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2016, 30(1):24-39.[13] 蒋丽芹,李思卉.沉淀冗余、跨界搜寻与高科技企业创新绩效——战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(22):73-80.[14] CHESBROUGH H W,BOGERS M. Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation[M]//New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014：3-28.[15] GRIMPE C，SOFKA. Search patterns and absorptive capacity:low and high- technology sectors in European countries[J].Research Policy,2009,38(3): 495-506.[16] 王建平,吴晓云.制造企业知识搜寻对渐进式和突破式创新的作用机制[J].经济管理,2017,39(12):58-72.[17] SIDHU J S，COMMANDEUR H R,VOLBERDA H W A.The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: value of supply，demand，and spatial search for innovation[J]. Organization Science,2007,18(1):20-38．[18] ZHANG H, WU F, CUI A S. Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: a contingency perspective[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2015, 32(3): 297-308.[19] 曹兴,孙绮悦.新兴技术知识网络跨界融合的机理与实证研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39(5):854-866.[20] 董媛媛,卢斌斌.行业产业协同创新中心知识扩散网络演化特征与影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(11):75-82. [21] GUAN J C,LIU N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: a patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy, 2016,45(1):97-112.[22] 韩晨,高山行.市场学习、创新方式与企业多维绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(7):68-75.[23] 王思梦,井润田,邵云飞.联盟惯例对企业双元创新能力的影响机制研究[J].管理科学,2019,32(2):19-32.[24] HE Z L, WONG P K.Exploration vs.exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization Science,2004,15(4):481-494[25] SOFKAW, GRIMPE C. Specialized search and innovation performance: evidence across Europe[J]. R&D Management, 2010, 40(3):310-323.[26] MU J, DI BENEDETTO A.Networking capability and new product development[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2012,59(1):4-19.[27] TIWANA A, MCLEAN E R. Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2005, 22(1):13-43.[28] FLATTEN T C, ENGELEN A, ZAHRA S A, et al. A measure of absorptive capacity:scale development and validation[J]. European Management Journal, 2011, 29(2):98-116.[29] YUAN L, ZHONGFENG S, YI L. Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(5-6):300-309. |
|
|
|
