|
|
|
| Unconventional or Duplicity? Influencing Mechanism of Work Values of Millennial on Bootleg Innovation |
| Hou Xuanfang,Liu Yunqi,Huang Rong,Li Wenqi |
| (Business School, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on basic psychological need theory, the present research seeks to explore the relationship between work values and bootleg innovation among millennial workers. Using the empirical research of 343 valid data on millennial workers, we examine the hypotheses with path analysis and hierarchical regressions. The results suggest that millennial employees' work values are positively related to their bootleg innovation and psychological empowerment mediates the relationship between millennial employees’ work values and bootleg innovation. Moreover, emotional intelligence and task interdependence significantly moderate the relations of work values to psychological empowerment and psychological empowerment to bootleg innovation. The present research not only supplements literature of work values and basic?psychological need, but also provides multiple perspectives in cracking the motivation of millennial employees' bootleg innovation and improving organizational innovation management.
|
|
Received: 29 August 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] PAOLA C, AMMON S, ANNE L. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance [J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(5): 1287-1305.[2] 黄玮, 项国鹏, 杜运周. 越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(1):143-154.[3] AUGSDORFER P. Bootlegging and path dependency research policy[J].Management Science，2005, 34(1):1-11.[4] HOU X F,LI W Q,YUAN Q.The mechanism of frontline disruptive leadership on Chinese new generation employees′ innovative behavior: the moderating role of emotional intelligence [J]. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2018, 24(4):459-471.[5] 刘晓琴. 非伦理领导与员工创新越轨行为:多重中介效应分析[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3):188-196. [6] 吴士健,杜梦贞,张洁.真实型领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响——组织自尊与建设性责任认知的链式中介作用及差错反感文化的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2020，37(6)：1-10.[7] 郭萌.何以激发越轨创新——双元领导与责任知觉的作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(9):49-54.[8] 丁越兰,徐显航,覃鹏.新生代员工工作价值观、企业性质对创新绩效的影响[J]. 商业研究, 2016，58(9):159-166.[9] GLOBOCNIK D, SALOMO S. Do formal management practices impact the emergence of bootlegging behavior? [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4):505-521. [10] 侯烜方, 卢福财. 新生代工作价值观、内在动机对工作绩效影响——组织文化的调节效应[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(4):157-168. [11] 王朝雪. 家长式领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响研究[J]. 中国劳动, 2019，69(5):58-69.[12] 王朝晖. 员工资质过剩感与越轨创新——基于悖论视角的链式中介关系研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2019, 36(5):128-134.[13] 赵乐, 乐嘉昂, 王雷. 领导调节聚焦行为对越轨创新的影响——创新资源结构性紧张和创造力的联合调节作用[J]. 预测, 2019, 38(1):1-7.[14] 李超平, 田宝, 时勘. 变革型领导与员工工作态度:心理授权的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2006，38(2):297-307.[15] DECI E L, RYAN R M. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior [J]. Psychology Inquiry, 2000, 11(4):319-338.[16] 容琰, 隋杨, 杨百寅. 领导情绪智力对团队绩效和员工态度的影响——公平氛围和权力距离的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9):1152-1161.[17] 王艳子, 罗瑾琏, 史江涛. 任务互依性对团队创造力影响机理研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(24):146-150.[18] 张君, 孙健敏, 尹奎. 90后新生代员工的特征：基于社会表征的探索[J]. 企业经济, 2019，39(8):111-117. [19] 肖志明. “将在外，君命有所不受”——远程岗位真的有利于员工越轨创新行为吗[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(4):36-47. [20] 任华亮, 郑莹, 张庆垒. 工作幸福感对员工创新绩效的影响——工作价值观和工作自主性的双重调节[J]. 财经论丛, 2019，34(3):94-103.[21] 赵燕梅, 张正堂, 刘宁, 等. 自我决定理论的新发展述评[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13(7):1095-1104. [22] 侯烜方, 李燕萍, 涂乙冬. 新生代工作价值观结构、测量及对绩效影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6):823-840.[23] 李燕萍, 侯烜方. 新生代员工工作价值观结构及其对工作行为的影响机理[J]. 经济管理, 2012, 34(5):77-86. [24] MADRID H P, PATTERSON M G, BIRDI K S. The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality innovative work behavior: a multilevel and interactional model [J]． Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(2):234-256． [25] CRISCUOLO P, SALTER A, TERWAL A. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance [J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(5):1287-1305. [26] SPREITZER G M. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(2):483-504.[27] JANSSEN O. The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior [J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2005, 78(4):573-579.[28] 魏峰, 袁欣, 邸杨. 交易型领导、团队授权氛围和心理授权影响下属创新绩效的跨层次研究[J]. 管理世界, 2009，25(4):135-142. [29] SHRI C. Developing the next generation of leaders: how to engage millennial in the workplace [J]. Leadership Advance Online, 2011(1):1-6.[30] MAINEMELIS C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(4):558-578.[31] 赵斌,古睿,李瑶.员工越轨创新成功的情境化研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(11):2102-2112.[32] 鲁虹, 赵赞. 破坏性领导对下属离职倾向的影响研究:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019，34(6):40-50.[33] 方雯, 王林雪, 冯耕中, 等. 内在动机、管理者情绪智力与员工创造力关系研究——基于3类所有制企业R&D背景的实证[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(7):142-148.[34] 俞彬彬, 钟建安. 情绪智力、组织公平和组织公民行为关系的研究[J]. 心理科学, 2008，31(2):475-478.[35] 徐小燕,张进辅.情绪智力理论的发展综述[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002，28(6):77-82. [36] 李燃, 王辉, 赵佳卉. 真诚型领导行为对团队创造力的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2016, 29(5):71-82.[37] GILSON J E, SHALLEY C E. A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams engagement in creative processes [J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(4):453-470.[38] 胡进梅, 沈勇. 工作自主性和研发人员的创新绩效:基于任务互依性的调节效应模型[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2014，27(17):30-35.[39] THOMAS K W, VELTHOUSE B A. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(4):666-681.[40] WONG C S, LAW K S. The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(3):483-496.[41] LIDEN R C, WAYNE S J, SPARROWE R T. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(6):723-746.[42] MALHOTRA N K, KIM S S, PATIL A. Common method variance in is research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research [J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(12):1865-1883.[43] 马跃如, 郭小闻. 组织支持感、心理授权与工作投入——目标导向的调节作用[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020, 34(4):120-128. |
|
|
|
