|
|
|
| The Reform of Scientific Research Evaluation from the Perspective of Scientific Research Autonomy |
| Wang Shao |
| (School of Marxism, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Scientific research autonomy plays a key role in scientific research evaluation, but it has not been paid enough attention in the academic circle. Scientific research autonomy is different from academic freedom, academic autonomy and academical sovereignty, and it can not be simply understood as a right in academic freedom and autonomy. The essence of scientific research autonomy is the right to carry out scientific research freely. The subject exercises scientific research autonomy through the way of freely carrying out or abandoning research behavior, and is constrained by relevant legal relations. At present, the policy of scientific research evaluation has partially stipulated the autonomy of scientific research, but there are still some problems in the aspects of peer review mechanism, representative work system, intellectual property rights of independently obtained achievements, independent use of scientific research funds, restrictions on the autonomy of scientific research and ways of right relief. In the reform of scientific research evaluation, scientific research autonomy should be included in the establishment of evaluation standards, the operation of administrative power should be based on the protection of scientific research autonomy of scientific researchers, and the rules and restrictions for the exercise of scientific research autonomy of scientific researchers should be stipulated.
|
|
Received: 13 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] WILLIAMS R J P. Science in universities: teaching, research and autonomy[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1991, 16(1): 15-22.[2] 刘兰剑,应海涛.基于立法的日本科研评价体系研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(4):145-153.[3] 吴勇,夏文娟,朱卫东,等.英国高校科研评估改革、科研卓越框架及其应用[J].中国科技论坛,2019，35(2):160-168+178.[4] 段洪波.以人才培养为导向的高校科研评价改革探析[J].中国高教研究,2013，31(5):74-77+103.[5] 薛二勇.中国高校科研经费管理制度改革的政策分析[J].北京社会科学,2014，29(3):20-26.[6] 顾萍,夏旭,伍雪莹,等.高校科研评价指标体系构建研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(9):94-101. [7] 刘春丽.Altmetrics指标在科研评价与管理方面的应用——争议、评论和评估[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(6):13-22.[8] SMITH S, WARD V, HOUSE A. 'Impact' in the proposals for the UK's research excellence framework: shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(10): 1369-1379.[9] 张弢.中世纪大学之“学术自由”辨析[J].北京大学教育评论,2017,15(1):89-106+189-190.[10] 菲利普·G·阿特巴赫.变革中的学术职业——比较的视角[M].青岛:中国海洋大学出版社, 2006:206.[11] 国际教育百科全书(5)[M].贵阳:贵州教育出版社, 1990:572.[12] 王洪才,刘隽颖.学术自由:现代大学制度的奠基石[J].复旦教育论坛,2016,14(1):50-57.[13] 袁江洋.科学史:学科独立与学术自主[J].科学与社会,2011,1(3):41-61.[14] 徐飞,程志波.科学争论中的学术主权刍论[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(5):75-81.[15] 梅里亚姆.卢梭以来的主权学说史[M]．毕洪海，译,北京：法律出版社，2006:21.[16] 张文显．法理学[M]．北京:高等教育出版社，2007:142.[17] 黄涛.主体性时代的权利理论——改革开放以来中国权利理论的逻辑演进[J].法制与社会发展,2019,25(1):51-67.[18] 哈耶克．法律、立法与自由(第二、三卷)[M]．邓正来，张守东，李静冰，译．北京:中国大百科全书出版社，2000:181．[19] 郑成良.论自由权利——简析自由概念在法理学中的含义[J].当代法学,1988,2(3):29-32.[20] 郭道晖.中国的权利立法及其法理基础[J].甘肃政法学院学报,1995，11(4):18-22.[21] STEPHEN HOLMES, CASS R SUNSTEIN．The cost of rights，why liberty depends on taxes[M].New Yok:Norton＆ Company, 2000: 20-21.[22] 刘作翔.权利冲突:案例、理论与冲突解决机制[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社, 2014:188.[23] POLANYI M. The autonomy of science[J]. The Scientific Monthly, 1945, 60(2): 141-150.[24] STEINMETZ G. Scientific autonomy, academic freedom, and social research in the United States[J]. Critical Historical Studies, 2018,5(2): 281-309.[25] FATHI S. San Francisco declaration on research assessment[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013,216(12):533-534.[26] CHENG J P, LI X X, XU F. Science-evaluation reform on the road in China[J]. National Science Review, 2018, 5(5):605.[27] 刘小强,蒋喜锋.知识转型、“双一流”建设与高校科研评价改革——从近年来高校网络科研成果认定说起[J].中国高教研究,2019,35(6):59-64.[28] 王少.科技人才评价的地位、遵循与本质要求[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(4):142-145.[29] DESMOND H. Professionalism in science: competence,autonomy, and service[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26(3): 1287–1313. |
|
|
|
