|
|
|
| Innovation Resource Allocation Structure and Innovation Performance：A Perspective of Ownership |
| Zhang Xin,Peng Jisheng,Tu Haiyin |
| （Business School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Ownership, innovation input and innovation performance has always been one of the focus questions. Although integrating the institutional logic and efficiency logic helps reconcile existing contradictory perspectives, input-output models ignore the micro factors that affect innovation performance and do not account for heterogeneity in resource allocation structure. Taking micro-level firm resource factor allocation as the breakthrough point, this paper firstly subdivides firms' resource allocation into three structures: personnel structure, personnel structure of senior and funding structure. From the perspective of ownership, the black box of firm's innovation investment is opened. The results show that compared with private firms, state-owned enterprises tend to allocate more resources. Further analysis shows that: ①Among the three resource allocation structures of State-Owned enterprises, only the funding structure is reasonable, which can significantly improve innovation performance. However, personnel structure is not helpful. ②In contrast, for private enterprises, the allocation of personnel structure is reasonable to make a great contribution. ③ The allocation of personnel structure of senior is unreasonable, and there's no significant difference between two kinds of the enterprises. This founding illustrates that state-owned enterprises are better to play the role of things, while private enterprises are good at using the advantages of human. The results offer a new micro perspective to explain the differences in innovation performance caused by ownership variations.
|
|
Received: 25 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 高歌.产权性质与企业创新绩效[J].商业研究, 2013, 55(5):20-25.[2] 吴延兵.中国哪种所有制类型企业最具创新性[J].世界经济,2012,35(6):25-29.[3] 刘和旺, 郑世林, 王宇锋. 所有制类型、技术创新与企业绩效[J].中国软科学, 2015,29(3):33-45.[4] TENG D, YI J.Impact of ownership types on R＆D intensity and innovation performance-evidence from transitional China[J].中国工商管理研究前沿：英文版, 2017(11):137.[5] ZHOU K Z, GAO G Y, ZHAO H.State ownership and firm innovation in China[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2017.[6] 魏巍, 彭纪生, 华斌.政府创新支持与企业创新:制度理论和委托代理理论的整合[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), DOI:10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.jg.2020.05.008.[7] KLINGEBIEL R,RAMMER C.Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management[J].Strategic Management Journal,2014,35(2):246-268.[8] 吴延兵.不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J].产业经济研究,2014,13(2):53-64.[9] PETTY W.A treatise of taxes and contributions[M].Berkeley: University of California Press,1662.[10] MARX K F H, J F BLUMENBACH.The anthropological treatises of johann friedrich blumenbach[M].London:Longman, 1865.[11] CARTER C F,SAMUELSON P A.Foundations of economic analysis[J].The Economic Journal,1950,60(238):351.[12] KOOPMANS T C,BECKMANN M.Assignment problems and the location of economic activities[J].Econometrica,1957,25(1):53.[13] 厉以宁.市场经济大辞典[M].北京:新华出版社,1993.[14] POWERS J B,MCDOUGALL P P.University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public:a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(3):291-311.[15] HENDRIKS M,VOETEN B,KROEP L.Human resource allocation in a multi-project R&D environment:resource capacity allocation and project portfolio planning in practice[J].International Journal of Project Management,1999,17(3):181-188.[16] KWAN L Y Y,CHIU C Y.Country variations in different innovation outputs:the interactive effect of institutional support and human capital[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2015,36(7):1050-1070.[17] HURWITZ J,LINES S,MONTGOMERY B,et al.The linkage between management practices,intangibles performance and stock returns[J].Journal of Intellectual Capital,2002,3(1):51-61.[18] 李正卫,张祥富,张萍萍.区域学习能力对创新绩效影响研究:基于我国各省市的实证分析[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(20):85-88.[19] DAKHLI M,DE CLERCQ D.Human capital,social capital,and innovation:a multi-country study[J].Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,2004,16(2):107-128.[20] 冉秋红,任重.企业智力资本结构与自主创新绩效:运用DEA方法的实践验证[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(12):85-89.[21] 张玉臣,周洁.外资高新技术企业创新绩效及其行为特征[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(17):81-86.[22] 周恩德,刘国新.我国新型研发机构创新绩效影响因素实证研究:以广东省为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(9):42-47.[23] 曹琴,玄兆辉.中国与世界主要科技强国研发人员投入产出的比较[J].科技导报,2020,38(13):96-103.[24] 李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010,45(5):55-67.[25] 徐明东,田素华.转型经济改革与企业投资的资本成本敏感性:基于中国国有工业企业的微观证据[J].管理世界,2013(2):125-135,171.[26] 李冲,钟昌标.融资成本差异与企业创新:理论分析与实证检验:基于国有企业与民营企业的比较研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(17):98-103.[27] 杨治,闫泽斌,余林徽,等.国有企业研发投入对民营企业创新行为的影响[J].科研管理,2015,36(4):82-90.[28] 程虹,林丽梅.不同所有制企业技术创新投入效应差异性研究:来自中国企业-劳动力匹配调查[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(6):77-83.[29] 张初永.试论国企青年科技人才的培训、使用与激励[J].中国科技论坛,2002,18(4):74-78.[30] 孙忠娟,刘晨蕊,周江华,等.科技资助影响企业创新的资源门槛[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(1):16-32.[31] 王晓珍.科技经费配置对市场创新绩效影响测度及结构优化研究:以我国部分省域高技术产业为例[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2012.[32] 鞠晓生,卢荻,虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究,2013,48(1):4-16.[33] 张文菲,张诚.国企民营化对创新绩效的影响:事实与机制:基于中国工业企业微观数据的分析[J].投资研究,2018,37(6):27-45.[34] LIN C,OFFICER M S,ZOU H.Directors' and officers' liability insurance and acquisition outcomes[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2011,102(3):507-525.[35] 邓子梁,陈岩.外商直接投资对国有企业生存的影响:基于企业异质性的研究[J].世界经济,2013,36(12):53-69.[36] 余静文.企业国有化中的政府角色[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(3):155-173.[37] 郑江淮,张玉昌.政府研发资助促进企业创新的有效性:激励效应异质性假说与检验[J].经济理论与经济管理,2019,38(12):17-34.[38] ROSS GARNAUT, LIGANG SONG, YANG YAO, et al.The emerging private enterprise in China[M].Canberra: The National University of Australia Press, 2000.[39] 卢峰,姚洋.金融压抑下的法治、金融发展和经济增长[J].中国社会科学,2004,25(1):42-55,206.[40] WOODMAN R W,SAWYER J E,GRIFFIN R W.Toward a theory of organizational creativity[J].Academy of Management Review,1993,18(2):293-321.[41] LIU F,CHOW I H S,ZHANG J C,et al.Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior:exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment[J].Review of Managerial Science,2019,13(4):771-789. |
|
|
|
