|
|
|
| Research Context and Prospects of Liability of Foreignness: Analysis Based on CiteSpace |
| Zhang Yuting,Sun Huan |
| (School of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance &Economics, Bengbu 233000, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Liability of foreignness is an important issue in international business research.The limited literature of review is not only early but also subjective qualitative analysis.With the deepening of research, especially the rapid increase of domestic literature in recent years, it is necessary to reorganize the existing research.To make up for the lack of qualitative analysis, CiteSpace analysis software was used, taking Chinese and English literatures from 2008 to 2020 as samples, visual comparative analysis was carried out on liability of foreignness in terms of publication volume, country, journal, institution, author and keywords.Moreover, a research framework based on theoretical evolution was constructed to reveal research hotspots and trends of liability of foreignness by combining high-frequency and bursts keywords.The study found that domestic research started late and still needs to be deepened; Domestic institutions and scholars have not yet formed a close cooperative relationship; The research at the individual level needs to be expanded; The corresponding research in emerging economies is worthy of attention; The research method and measurement indicators need to be optimized.
|
|
Received: 18 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]ZAHEER S.Overcoming the liability of foreignness[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38(2) :341-363.[2]SETHI D, GUISINGER S.Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage: how multinational enterprises cope with the international business environment[J].Journal of International Management, 2002, 8(3): 223-240.[3]KOGUT B, SINGH H.The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, 19(3): 411-432.[4]KOSTOVA T, ZAHEER S.Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise[J].Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 64-81.[5]CHEN H, GRIFFITH D A, HU M Y.The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies, an illustration of market entry in China[J].International Marketing Review, 2006, 23(6):636-649.[6]MADHOK A, KEYHANI M.Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies[J].Global Strategy Journal, 2012, 2(1): 26-40.[7]PETERSEN B，PEDERSEN T.Coping with liability of foreignness: different leaning engagements of entrant firms[J].Journal of International Management, 2002, 8(3): 339-350.[8]KLOSSEK A, LINKE B M, NIPPA M.Chinese enterprises in Germany: establishment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreignness[J].Journal of World Business, 2012, 47(1): 35-44.[9]任兵，郑莹.外来者劣势研究前沿探析与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理，2012，34（2）：27-34.[10]张宇婷，王增涛.外来者劣势的基本问题：动态演进视角[J].亚太经济，2014，31（1）：97-103, 107.[11]HYMER S.The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960/1976: 34-35.[12]KRUGMAN P R.Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade[J].Journal of International Economics, 1979, 9(4): 469-479.[13]LUO Y, SHENKAR O, NYAW M K.Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: defensive versus offensive approaches[J].Journal of International Management, 2002, 8(3): 283-300.[14]ZHOU L, BAMES B R, LU Y.Entrepreneurial proclivity, capability upgrading and performance advantage of newness among international new ventures[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(5): 882-905.[15]杜晓君，蔡灵莎.组织学习、投资区域与外来者劣势研究——以中国上市公司为例[J].经济管理，2016，38（3）：181-191.[16]吴晓云，陈怀超.制度距离在国际商务中的应用:研究脉络梳理与未来展望[J].管理评论，2013，25（4）：12-22.[17]QIAN G, LI L, RUGMAN A M.Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2013, 44(6): 635-647.[18]张宇婷，王增涛，蒋云龙.地区经济集聚对外来者劣势的影响——基于500家在华跨国子公司的分析[J].国际贸易问题，2016，42（7）：109-118.[19]张宇婷，蒋云龙.地区经济集聚、企业异质性与外来者劣势[J].现代经济探讨，2017，36（7）：45-54.[20]MILLER S R, PARKHE A.Is there a LOF in global banking? an empirical test of bank's X-efficiency[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(1): 55-75.[21]ZAHEER S, MOSAKOWSKI E.The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18 (6): 439-463.[22]HENNART J F, ROEHL T, ZENG M.Do exits proxy a liability of foreignness? the case of Japanese exits from the US[J].Journal of International Management, 2002, 8(3): 241-264.[23]MATA J, FREITAS E.Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(7): 615-630.[24]MEZIAS J M.Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: the case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(3): 229-244.[25]BELL R G, FILATOTCHEV I, RASHEED A A.The liability of foreignness in capital markets: sources and remedies[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(2): 107-122.[26]杜晓君，史艳华，蔡灵莎.股票市场中的外来者劣势研究[J].管理科学，2016，29（3）：148-160.[27]BASU N, CHEVRIER M.Distance, information asymmetry, and mergers: evidence from Canadian firms[J].Managerial Finance,2011, 37(1) : 21-33.[28]阎大颖.制度距离、国际经验与中国企业海外并购的成败问题研究[J].南开经济研究，2011,27（5）： 75-97.[29]蔡灵莎，杜晓君，史艳华，等.外来者劣势、组织学习与对外直接投资绩效研究[J].管理科学，2015，28（4）：36-45.[30]李梅，赵乔，包于巧.外来者劣势与海外并购企业的生产率提升[J].产经评论，2020，11（1）：67-81.[31]LUO Y, TAN J J.A comparison of multinational and domestic firms in an emerging market: a strategic choice perspective[J].Journal of International Management, 1998, 4 (1): 21-40.[32]GOMES R M, CAMEIRO J, DIB L A.Branded retailer expansion on a continent-sized emerging market[J].International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2018,46(9):820-834.[33]袁柳.制度距离与中国企业OFDI的进入模式选择——基于上市企业的数据检验[J].经济与管理，2019，33（6）：86-92.[34]MURATOVA Y.Domestic acquisition experience and the internationalization of Chinese firms: the role of institutional heterogeneity[J].Management and Organization Review, 2018, 14(4): 693-714.[35]牟宇鹏，汪涛，周玲.外来者劣势下企业的国际化战略选择：基于制度理论的视角[J].经济与管理研究，2017，38（1）：119-130.[36]BERRY H, GUILLEN M F, ZHAU N.An institutional approach to cross national distance[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2010，41(9): 1460-1480.[37]MARANO V, ARREGLE J L, HITT M A, et al.Home country institutions and the internationalization- performance relationship[J].Journal of Management, 2016, 42(5): 1075-1110.[38]衣长军，刘晓丹，王玉敏，等.制度距离与中国企业海外子公司生存——所有制与国际化经验的调节视角[J].国际贸易问题，2019,45（9）：115-132.[39]BAIK B, KANG J K, KIM J M, et al.The liability of foreignness in international equity investments: evidence from the US stock market[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2013, 44(4): 391-411.[40]王进猛，徐玉华，易志高.文化距离损害了外资企业绩效吗[J].财贸经济，2020，41（2）：115-131.[41]冯德连，施亚鑫.四维距离视角下中国对“一带一路”国家直接投资研究[J].江淮论坛，2018,291（5）：5-13, 2.[42]王雯，杨蓉.“一带一路”倡议对中国制造业企业国际化程度的影响——基于双重差分模型的估计[J].企业经济，2018，37（11）：70-77.[43]肖文，周君芝.国家特定优势下的中国OFDI区位选择偏好——基于企业投资动机和能力的实证检验[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版），2013，44（1）：184-196.[44]NEWBURRY W, GARDBERG N A, BELKIN L Y.Organizational a attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: the interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, 37(5): 666-686.[45]JOARDAR A, WU S.Liabilities and benefits: examining the two sides of the foreignness coin from entrepreneurial perspective[J].International Business Review, 2017, 26(6): 1157-1167.[46]陈健，柳卸林，邱姝敏，等.海归创业的外来者劣势和知识资本的调节作用[J].科学学研究，2017，35（9）：1348-1358.[47]吴亮，吕鸿江.资源禀赋、制度环境与中国企业海外进入模式选择[J].国际经贸探索，2016，32（3）：75-88. |
|
|
|
