|
|
|
| Longitudinal Matching of Advantage Alliance Type Scientific Research Team Innovation Capability |
| Yang Kai1,2,Zhou Yan2,3 |
| （1.School of Business,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing 210044,China; 2.School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110167,China; 3.Economics and Management School,Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471023,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The rise of new research institutions such as West Lake University has set off a new round of scientific research talents.Aiming at the clear lack of longitudinal matching in innovation capabilities,the current research has focused on member selections.Based on the perspective of advantage theory,this paper refines the innovation capability evaluation elements based on the advantage alliance type scientific research team's innovation activities,builds the longitudinal matching model based on the individual advantage identification method,and finally uses the case application method to verify the rationality and superiority.Specifically,the longitudinal matching model oriented by the advantages of scientific research personnel takes into account individual comparison and group pattern analysis on the basis of identifying the individual characteristics of external researchers.Then the paper selects members who meet the requirements of team innovation ability and achieves the complementary advantages between members.The goal of innovation and synergy is to provide reference to the problems of fuzzy innovation of members' innovation,poor cooperation of members,and weak level of innovation.According to the research conclusions,management revelation is given from the aspects of improving innovation ability,maintaining evaluation rationality,and perfecting team advantage configuration.
|
|
Received: 18 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 王丽平,李忠华.半虚拟创新团队中虚拟性概念界定与量表开发[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(3): 116-122.[2] 周姗姗,徐坤,毕强.科研用户场景下的高校科研数据组织管理架构构建[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(18): 29-34.[3] 段万春,曹勤伟,杜凤娇.外智引联型创新团队研究述评与发展动态分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(10): 154-160.[4] 蒋四华,黄群俊.地方高校创新型科研团队建设存在的问题及对策——以长江大学为例[J].长江大学学报（社科版）,2015,38(11): 70-72.[5] 居佳,任旭,郝生跃.基于文化演化视角的项目团队内知识转移仿真研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37(1): 169-178[6] 严蔷薇.科研队伍创新能力的绩效考核模式研究[J].中国高校科技,2016(7): 43-45.[7] 冯海燕.高校科研团队创新能力绩效考核管理研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(1): 54-62.[8] 王晓蓬,许安琪.高校科技创新团队“定性”与“定量”评价及其优化措施[J].浙江理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2018,40(3): 28-33.[9] 张忻,韩争胜.高校科研团队持续创新能力评价方法设计[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(23): 182-186.[10] HUANG S T,ZHAO X N,CHANG S,el al.Organizational construction of a new type of university scientific research team based on jingyou thought[J].Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science and Technology Education,2017,13(8): 5615-5627.[11] 贾明媚,张兰霞,付竞瑶,等.基于竞优评析的高层次科技人才评价[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(16): 120-125.[12] 段万春,杜凤娇,李阳.外智引联型创新团队成员优选方法探索[J].科技进步与对策，2017,34(10): 118-123.[13] DUBREUIL P,FOREST J,FRANOIS COURCY.From strengths use to work performance: the role of harmonious passion,subjective vitality,and concentration[J].Journal of Positive Psychology,2014,9(4): 335-349.[14] 〖JP+3〗FOREST J,GENEVIVE A MAGEAU,CREVIER-BRAUD L, et al.Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths′ use and well-being at work: test of an intervention program[J].Human Relations,2012,65(9):1233-1252.[15] GLASER B G,STRAUSS A L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research[M].New York: Aldine,1967.[16] PANDIT N R.The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method[J].The Qualitative Report,1996,2(4): 1-20.[17] YIN R K.Case study research: design and methods[M].Los Angeles: Sage Publications,2009.[18] 赵希男,王奇,朱春红.一种基于目标界定的客观识别个性特征的方法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2006,15(5): 459-466+474.[19] 赵希男,刘炳东,许慧敏.竞优思想及其对人类进步的作用分析[J].科学技术与辩证法,2006,23(2): 32-35+110.[20] 王晓蓬,许安琪.高校科技创新团队“定性”与“定量”评价及其优化措施[J].浙江理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2018,40(3): 28-33.[21] 何玉林,黄哲学.大规模数据集聚类算法的研究进展[J].深圳大学学报（理工版）,2019,36(1): 4-17. |
|
|
|
