|
|
The Impact of Communication Behavior of R&D Team on Independent Innovation Performance in High-tech Enterprises |
Li Jinsheng,Qiao Ying |
(Business School,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China) |
|
|
Abstract In the era of knowledge economy,knowledge is the source and important resource of enterprise development and innovation.Team communication behavior of R&D team is an important factor affecting the performance of independent innovation in high-tech enterprises,and it is of great significance to explore its impact mechanism on the performance of independent innovation.Based on the theories of social identity and knowledge sharing,the relationship between communication behavior and independent innovation performance of R&D team in High-tech Enterprises is analyzed with knowledge absorption capacity as the mediating variable.288 valid samples are empirically analyzed with stepwise regression analysis and other research methods.The results show that cooperative communication of R&D team has a positive impact on team's product innovation performance and process innovation performance,while competitive communication and avoidance communication of R&D team have a negative impact on team's product innovation performance and process innovation performance;Knowledge absorption ability plays a significant mediating role in cooperative communication,competitive communication of R&D team and independent innovation performance,but it has no significant mediating role in avoidance communication of R&D team on independent innovation performance.The research on this mechanism provides a new way to improve the independent innovation performance of R&D teams in high-tech enterprises,and provides important inspiration for enterprises to improve their knowledge sharing and innovation ability and carry out innovation activities.
|
Received: 24 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] BROWN S,GRAY D,MCHARDY J,et al.Employee trust and workplace performance [J].Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,2014,116:361-37.[2] 王春玲,刘建准.知识型员工创新行为激励策略研究——员工沟通意愿的调节作用[J].东南大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2017,19(S2):119-121.[3] 王新华,车珍,于灏,等.知识网络嵌入和知识集聚方式对组织创新力的影响差异性——知识共享意愿的视角[J].技术经济,2018,37(9):46-55+91.[4] 史江涛.沟通氛围与知识共享:一个实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34 (1):40-45.[5] HOOFF B, DE RIDDER JA.Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment,communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2004,8(6):117-130.[6] 刘小禹,刘军.团队情绪氛围对团队创新绩效的影响机制[J].心理学报,2012,44 (4):546-557.[7] 王仙雅,林盛,陈立芸,等.组织氛围、隐性知识共享行为与员工创新绩效关系的实证研究[J].软科学,2014,28(5):43-47.[8] 严文华.管理者个体沟通风格研究[C].中国心理学会,2001:2.[9] 倪旭东.知识异质性对团队创新的作用机制研究[J].企业经济,2010(8):57-63.[10] 李伟,周纯,黄小艳.团队冲突对团队创新绩效的影响机制及条件[J].产业创新研究,2017(2):70-80.[11] 骆毅,陈彦凤.团队沟通、信任与冲突关系的实证研究[J].科技和产业2015,15(12):62-69.[12] 郝金磊,尹萌.团队冲突、团队沟通与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].西安财经学院学报,2018,31(6):43-49.[13] GERARDINE DESANCTIS,PETER MONGE.Communication processes for virtual organizations[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,1998,3(4).[14] GREEN SG.Examing a curvilinear relation-ship between communication frequency and team performance in cross-functional project team[J].IEEE transaction on Engineering Management,2003(50):262-269.[15] 束义明,郝振省.高管团队沟通对决策绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(4):170-180.[16] 房晓冉,王兴元.团队宽容氛围与创客团队绩效:沟通协作的中介机制研究[J].企业经济,2018,37(11):142-148.[17] 刘效广,王艳平,李倩.创新氛围对员工创造力影响的多水平分析[J].管理评论,2010,22(8):84-89.[18] 屠兴勇,张琪,王泽英,等.知识工作者内生动机、知识共享意愿与创造力[J].科研管理,2017,38(10):111-118.[19] 晋琳琳,李德煌.科研团队学科背景特征对创新绩效的影响——以知识交流共享与知识整合为中介变量[J].科学学研究,2012,30(1):111-123+144.[20] DEUTSCHM.The resolution of conflict[M].New Haven,CT:Yale University Press,1973.[21] DE DREUCK,VAN VIANENAEM.Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams[J].Journal of Organization Behavior,2001,22(3):309-328.[22] 杜鹏程,姚瑶,房莹,王成城.社会交互作用对员工创新行为的影响——一个有中介的调节[J].软科学,2018,32(9):72-75.[23] TJOSVOLD.POON,YUD.合作与竟争理论的实验研究[J].管理世界,2002(8):126-133.[24] SZULANSKIG.The process of knowledge transfer:a diachronic analysisof stickiness[J].Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses,2000,82(1):9-27.[25] 任皓,邓三鸿.知识管理的重要步骤——知识整合[J].情报科学,2002(6)::650-653. |
|
|
|