|
|
|
| Research on the Impact of Scientific and Technological Innovation on the High-Quality Economic Development of China in the New Era |
| Xiao Renqiao1,Shen Lu1,Qian Li1,2 |
| (1.School of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 233030, China;2.School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the connotation of high-quality economic development in China in the new era, the index system was constructed and the difference and spatial correlation of high-quality economic development level of China's 30 provinces from 2008 to 2017 were empirically analyzed.Three spatial econometric models are selected to analyze the impact mechanism of innovation indicators onhigh-quality economic development.The results show that:①the average level of high-quality economic development in China is 0.322.The average of central and western regions was significantly lower, and the low index of economic innovation and open development was the main reason.The spatial positive correlation of high-quality economic development in China's provinces is significant;②the innovation strength in the two stages of China is obviously low.The innovation index, innovation strength and innovation efficiency of the eastern provinces in the two stages are all at the best level in China, while the performance loss of the central and western provinces is obvious at least in one certain stage; ③there is a U-shaped curve relationship between the level of high-quality economic development and the innovation index in the R&D stage of science and technology.The innovation strength in the stage of achievement transformation is conducive to the improvement of the high-quality development level.Government support has an obvious positive moderating effect on innovation index promoting high-quality developmentin the stage of achievement transformation.
|
|
Received: 03 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] LUCAS R E.On the mechanics of economic development[J].Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1): 3-42.[2] ROMER P.Increasing returns and long-run growth [J].Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(5): 1002-1037.[3] FAGERBERG J.Technology, growth and competitiveness: selected essays [M].Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002.[4] 李垣,汪应洛.企业技术创新动力机制构成要素的探讨[J].科学管理研究, 1994,12(4): 43-45.[5] 唐未兵,傅元海,王展祥.技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J].经济研究, 2014 (7): 31-43.[6] 苏治,徐淑丹.中国技术进步与经济增长收敛性测度—基于创新与效率的视角[J].中国社会科学, 2015(7):4-25.[7] 万建香,汪寿阳.社会资本与技术创新能否打破“资源诅咒”——基于面板门槛效应的研究[J].经济研究, 2016(12): 76-89.[8] 刘婷婷.R&D投入、创新机制与经济增长—新技术指标体系下的理论分析与实证检验[J].南开经济研究, 2017(3):139-153.[9] 张江雪,蔡宁,毛建素,等.自主创新、技术引进与中国工业绿色增长——基于行业异质性的实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(2):185-194.[10] 钞小静,任保平.中国经济增长质量的时序变化与地区差异分析[J].经济研究, 2011(4):26-40.[11] 魏敏,李书昊.新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2018 (11): 3-20.[12] 李金昌,史龙梅,徐蔼婷.高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J].统计研究, 2019, 36(1): 4-14.[13] 华坚,胡金昕.中国区域科技创新与经济高质量发展耦合关系评价[J].科技进步与对策, 2019,36(8): 19-27.[14] 辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁,等.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学, 2018, (10): 9-18.[15] 白俊红,王林东.创新驱动是否促进了经济增长质量的提升[J].科学学研究, 2016,34(11): 1725-1735.[16] 刘思明,张世瑾,朱惠东.国家创新驱动力测度及其经济高质量发展效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2019 (4): 3-23.[17] 洪银兴.“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义经济思想”笔谈[J].中国社会科学, 2018 (9):4-73.[18] 任保平,钞小静,魏婕.中国经济增长质量报告(2015)——中国经济增长质量指数及省区排名[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2015．[19] HANSEN M T, BIRKINSAW J.The innovation value chain[J].Harvard Business Review, 2007, 85(6): 121-130.[20] GUAN J C, CHEN K H.Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems[J].Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 102-115.[21] 郭斌.中国上市公司创新指数报告(2019年)[R].杭州:浙江大学管理学院, 2019．[22] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济, 2018(4):5-18.[23] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究, 2011(5):4-16.[24] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E.Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.[25] 李向东,李楠,白俊红,等.高技术产业研发创新效率分析[J].中国软科学, 2011,26(2):52-61.[26] LESAGE J P, PACE R K.Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows[J].Journal of Regional Science, 2008, 45(8):941-967. |
|
|
|
