|
|
|
| The Driven Factor and Its' Spatial-Temporal Differences of Scientific and Technological Innovation to the High-Quality Economic Development |
| Dong Xiaojun1,Shi Tao1,2 |
| (1.Party School of Central Committee of C.P.C( National Academy of Governance Economy Teaching and Research Institution, Beijing 100091,China;2.Henan academy of Social Science Economic Institution,Zhengzhou 450002,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the provincial panel data of 31 sample areas in China from 2009 to 2017,the spatial and temporal differences of influencing factors of scientific and technological innovation are analyzed by using the spatial econometric model.It is concluded that the high-quality economic development index of China has steadily increased, existed a significant spatial agglomeration and positive spillover effects, and a stronger spatial dependence effect.The variable of the R&D input intensity, R&D innovated output, the student number in universities per ten thousand and urbanization rate all have positive effects on high-quality economic development at different stages, while the impact of financial and educational expenditure is negative.The R&D investment intensity, urbanization rate and financial education expenditure in provinces with similar economic and geographical distance have positive effects on the high-quality development of economy in different stages, while the R&D innovated output, the student number in universities per ten thousand and the basic conditions of internet have negative effects.The human resource and fiscal expenditure on R&D in the western and central regions have a higher positive impact on high-quality economic development than in the eastern regions, while the positive effects of financial factors of science and technology innovation, R&D innovated output and transformation degree of scientific and technological achievements in the eastern regions on high-quality economic development are higher than those in the central and western regions.
|
|
Received: 02 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘国斌，宋瑾泽.中国区域经济高质量发展研究[J].区域经济评论，2019（2）:55-60.[2] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济，2018（4）:5-18.[3] 徐现祥,李书娟,王贤彬,等.中国经济增长目标的选择:以高质量发展终结“崩溃论”[J].世界经济，2018，41（10）:3-25.[4] 洪银兴,刘伟,高培勇,等.“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义经济思想”笔谈[J].中国社会科学，2018（9）:4-73+204-205.[5] 陈昌兵.新时代我国经济高质量发展动力转换研究[J].上海经济研究，2018（5）:16-24.[6] 高培勇,杜创,刘霞辉,等.高质量发展背景下的现代化经济体系建设:一个逻辑框架[J].经济研究，2019（4）:4-17.[7] JIAOCHEN L, GOETZ S J.Technology intensity and agglomeration economies[J].Research Policy, 2018, 47（10）:1990-1995.[8] 唐未兵,傅元海,王展祥.技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J].经济研究，2014，49（7）:31-43.[9] 张炜.研发投入、专利产出和经济增长关系的实证研究——基于浙江省统计数据[J].科学学研究，2008，26（S2）:323-326.[10] 洪银兴.创新驱动攀升全球价值链中高端[J].经济学家，2017（12）:6-9.[11] 吴延兵.自主研发、技术引进与生产率——基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J].经济研究，2008（8）:51-64.[12] 刘娟,张江林.我国不同地区技术交易与经济增长的差异研究[J].统计与决策，2012（24）: 144-146.[13] 赵玉林,魏芳.高技术产业发展对经济增长带动作用的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2006（6）:44-54.[14] 庞瑞芝,范玉,李扬.中国科技创新支撑经济发展了吗[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2014,31（10）:37-52.[15] 任保平,李禹墨.新时代背景下高质量发展新动能的培育[J].黑龙江社会科学，2018（4）:31-36.[16] 魏敏、李书昊.新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2018（11）:3- 20.[17] 刘思明,张世瑾,朱惠东.国家创新驱动力测度及其经济高质量发展效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2019，36（4）:3-23.[18] 方大春、马为彪.中国省际高质量发展的测度及时空特征[J].区域经济评论，2019（2）:62-70.[19] 华坚,胡金昕.中国区域科技创新与经济高质量发展耦合关系评价[J].科技进步与对策，2019，36（8）:19-27.[20] TIENTAO A, LEGROS D, PICHERY M C.Technology spillover and TFP growth: a spatial Durbin model[J].International Economics, 2016（145）:21-31.[21] HUANG B, WU B, BARRY M.Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24（3）:383-401. |
|
|
|
