|
|
Challenge Job Demand's Substitution Effect on Transformational Leadership: the Indirect Moderating Model of Researchers' Work Engagement |
Yang Hongming1,2 |
1.College of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics;2.Regional Innovation Management Research Center, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510000, China |
|
|
Abstract This study aims to discover the effect of transformational leadership on researchers' engagement. It collects data from 186 researchers from 4 universities and 1 research institution, and uses established measures to capture key variables.Multiple regression is employed to analyze data. Regression analysis shows that transformational leadership is positively associated with work engagement,and it is moderated by challenge job demand. In addition, intrinsic motivation fully mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Moreover,mediated moderating analysis find that challenge job demand moderates the effect of intrinsic motivation on work engagement negatively. So the challenge job demand moderating effect of transformational leadership on work engagement is negative and indirect. Then contributions, practical implications and limitations are discussed.
|
Received: 13 December 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Yang Hongming
|
|
|
|
[1]CARASCO-SAUL MARIE, KIM WOOCHEOL, KIM TAESUNG. Leadership and employee engagement: proposing research agendas through a review of literature[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2015,14(1): 38-63.
[2]KERR S, JERMIER J M. Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 1978,22(3):375-403.
[3]CRAWFORD EEAN R, LEPINE JEFFERY A, RICH BRUCE LOUIS. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010,95(5): 834–848.
[4]SCHAUFELI W B, SALANOVA M, GONZALEZ-ROMA V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a confirmative analytic approach[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002(3): 71-92.
[5]GAGNE M, DECI E L. Self-determination theory and work motivation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005,26(4):331-362.
[6]BASS B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
[7]SHUCK B, HERD A M. Employee engagement and leadership: exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2012,11(2):156-181.
[8]KAHN WILLIAM A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1990,33(4): 692-724.
[9]王桢, 陈乐妮, 李旭培. 变革型领导与工作投入: 基于情感视角的调节中介模型[J]. 管理评论, 2015,27(9):120-131.
[10]TIMS M, BAKKER A B, XANTHOPOULOU D.Do transformational leaders enhance their followers′ daily work engagement[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2011,22(1): 121-131.
[11]CAVANAUGH M A, BOSWELL W R, ROEHLING M V, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000,85(1): 65-74.
[12]ANJA VAN DEN BROECK, NELE DE CUYPER, HANS DE WITTE, et al. Not all job demands are equal: differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands-resources model[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2010,19(6): 735-759.
[13]刘得格, 时勘, 王永丽, 等. 挑战-阻碍性压力源与工作投入和满意度的关系[J]. 管理科学, 2011,24(2): 1-9.
[14]HOBFOLL S E, SHIROM A. Conservation of resources theory: applications to stress and management in the workplace[M]. New York: Dekker, 2001.
[15]SEERS A, MCGEE G W, SEREY T T, et al. The interaction of job stress and social support: a strong inference investigation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983,26(2):273-284.
[16]BAKKER ARNOLD B, ANA ISABEL SANZ-VERGEL. Weekly work engagement and flourishing: the role of hindrance and challenge job demands[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2013, 83(3): 397-409.
[17]TUCKEY MICHELLE R, BAKKER ARNOLD B, DOLLARD MAUREEN F. Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: a multilevel study[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2012,17(1): 15-27.
[18]PUTRA EKA DIRAKSA,CHO SEONGHEE,LIU JUAN.Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on work engagement in the hospitality industry: test of motivation crowding theory[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2015,41(7):829-837.
[19]郭桂梅,段兴民.变革型领导行为与创造性:内在动机和创造性工作氛围的中介作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2008(3):189-196.
[20]段锦云,黄彩云. 变革型领导对员工建言的影响机制再探:自我决定的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014,17(4):98-109.
[21]WEBSTER JENNICA R,BEEHR TERRY A,LOVE KEVIN.Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: the role of appraisal[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2011,79(2):505-516.
[22]李超平,时勘. 变革型领导的结构与测量[J]. 心理学报, 2005,37(6): 803-811.
[23]李巧灵,李茜茜,李宗波,等. 中文版挑战性-阻碍性压力源量表在民营企业员工中应用的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2014,28 (7):530-535.
[24]VALLERAND R J. Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory: a view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2000,11(4):312-318.
[25]周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950.
[26]温忠麟,张雷.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.
[27]叶宝娟, 温忠麟. 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(9):1050-1060.
|
|
|
|