|
|
Capital Market Liberalization and Corporate Innovation |
Sun Zeyu1,Qi Baolei2 |
(1.School of Managemnet, Xi’an Jiaotong University;2.School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China) |
|
|
Abstract Whether capital market reform can effectively promote the development of the real economy is a major challenge facing China's current economic development.Based on the research perspective of corporate innovation, this paper takes “Shanghai-Hong Kong” and “Shenzhen–Hong Kong” stock connect as an exogenous event and uses the multiple time difference-in-differences method (DID) to systematically investigate the specific impact and its internal mechanism of China's capital market opening on corporate innovation.We found that the implementation of “Shanghai–Hong Kong” and “Shenzhen–Hong Kong” stock connect has significantly improved the innovation performance of the target companies, which is reflected in the increase of patent output.Mechanism analysis found that the above relationship was more significant in the samples with higher management shareholding ratio and stronger financing constraints, indicating that “Shanghai–Hong Kong”and “Shenzhen-Hong Kong” stock connect improved innovation performance by increasing the management's willingness to innovate and improving the innovation ability of firms.Further analysis shows that the positive impact of capital market opening on corporate innovation is more significant in the sample with lower information transparency, active stocks on “Shanghai-Hong Kong” and “Shenzhen-Hong Kong” stock connect and poorer legal environment. This paper not only expands the research on the influencing factors of corporate innovation, but also provides empirical evidence from the micro company level for the economic consequences of the implementation of “Shanghai-Hong Kong” and “Shenzhen-Hong Kong” stock connect, and also provides some experience for the subsequent improvement of this system.
|
Received: 07 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] BEKAERT G,HARVEY C R,LUNDBLAD C T. Does financial liberalization spur growth[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2005,77(1):3-55.[2] 钟覃琳,陆正飞.资本市场开放能提高股价信息含量吗——基于“沪港通”效应的实证检验[J].管理世界,2018,34(1):169-179.[3] 刘海飞,柏巍,李冬昕,许金涛.沪港通交易制度能提升中国股票市场稳定性吗——基于复杂网络的视角[J].管理科学学报,2018,21(1):97-110.[4] 郭阳生,沈烈,汪平平.沪港通降低了股价崩盘风险吗——基于双重差分模型的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,40(6):30-44.[5] 陈怡欣,张俊瑞,汪方军.卖空机制对上市公司创新的影响研究——基于我国融资融券制度的自然实验[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(2):62-74.[6] 钟凯,孙昌玲,王永妍,王化成资本市场对外开放与股价异质性波动——来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J].金融研究,2018,61(7):178-196.[7] 连立帅,朱松,陈关亭.资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资——基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据[J].管理世界,2019,35(8):136-154.[8] BEKAERT G,HARVEY C R. Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets[J]. The journal of finance. 2000,55(2):565-613.[9] NAGHAVI N, LAU W Y. Exploring the nexus between financial openness and informational efficiency-does the quality of institution matter [J]. Applied Economics,2014,46(7):674-685.[10] 雷雷,邹红,栾炳江.沪港通是个股“强心剂”吗[J].财经科学,2018,62(2):15-27.[11] 吕大永,万孝园.沪港通提高了沪市标的的“股价信息含量”了吗 [J].投资研究,2017,36(10):91-105.[12] 纪彰波,臧日宏.资本市场开放能够提高股票价格稳定性吗?:基于沪港通的经验证据[J].世界经济研究,2019(5):14-26.[13] 权小锋,尹洪英.中国式卖空机制与公司创新——基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验[J].管理世界,2017(1):128-144.[14] 陈玉罡,蔡海彬,刘子健,程瑜.外资并购促进了科技创新吗 [J].会计研究,2015,36(9):68-73.[15] 田轩,孟清扬.股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(3):176-190.[16] 江轩宇,申丹琳,李颖.会计信息可比性影响企业创新吗[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(4):82-92.[17] 赵子夜,杨庆,陈坚波.通才还是专才:CEO的能力结构和公司创新[J].管理世界,2018,34(2):123-143.[18] LEUZ C,LINS K V,WARNOCK F E. Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms [J]. Review of Financial Studies,2010,23(3):3245-3285.[19] CHEN Q,GOLDSTEIN I,JIANG W. Price informativeness and investment sensitivity to stock price[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2007,20(3):619-650.[20] OLUBUNMI F, TUNDE K, ANAND V. Do better-connected ceos innovate more?[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2014,49(5-6):1201-1225.[21] 鞠晓生.中国上市企业创新投资的融资来源与平滑机制[J].世界经济, 2013,36(4): 138-159.[22] 肖涵,刘芳.资本账户开放政策对公司融资行为的影响——基于沪港通政策的实证研究[J].经济经纬,2019,36(3):58-65.[23] 郭阳生,沈烈,郭枚香.沪港通改善了上市公司信息环境吗——基于分析师关注度的视角[J].证券市场导报,2018,28(10):35-43.[24] BERTAND M,MULLAINATHAN S. Enjoying the quiet life? corporate governance and managerial preferences[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2003,111(5):1043-1075.[25] 陈钦源,马黎珺,伊志宏.分析师跟踪与企业创新绩效——中国的逻辑[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(3):15-27.[26] 沈红波,潘飞,高新梓.制度环境与管理层持股的激励效应[J].中国工业经济,2012,29(8):96-108.[27] KAPLAN S,ZINGALES L. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constra-ints[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112(1):169-216.[28] KRISHNASWAMI S,SUBRAMANIAM V. Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off deci-sion[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1999,53(1):73-112.[29] 韩美妮,王福胜.法治环境、财务信息与创新绩效[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(5):28-40.[30] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019. |
|
|
|