知识耦合视阈下大数据能力对新创企业创业绩效的影响机制研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022100609

科技进步与对策

2024, Vol. 41

Issue (8): 106-116 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022100609

知识科学与知识工程

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

知识耦合视阈下大数据能力对新创企业创业绩效的影响机制研究

袁勇志¹,诸葛凯¹,张勇²,林炜炜¹

（1.苏州大学商学院，江苏苏州 215021；2.中国计量大学经济与管理学院，浙江杭州 310018）

The Influence Mechanism of Big Data Capability on the Entrepreneurial Performance of New Ventures from the Perspective of Knowledge Coupling

Yuan Yongzhi¹,Zhuge Kai¹,Zhang Yong²,Lin Weiwei¹

(1.School of Business, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China;2.Institute of Quality Economics, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1305 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要数字经济时代，数据成为企业转型发展的重要资源，如何依托大数据能力优化知识能级并实现创业生存与成长目标成为新创企业“新创弱性”研究的关键问题。基于动态能力理论与知识基础观，将知识耦合引入大数据能力与新创企业创业绩效关系框架，构建以互补性知识耦合、替代性知识耦合为中介的研究模型，并基于212家新创企业调查数据进行实证检验。结果表明，大数据能力对知识耦合与新创企业创业绩效具有正向影响，大数据能力通过知识耦合影响新创企业创业绩效；互补性知识耦合与创业生存绩效呈倒U型关系，替代性知识耦合与创业成长绩效具有正相关关系；IT—业务战略匹配正向调节大数据能力与知识耦合的关系。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	袁勇志
	诸葛凯
	张勇
	林炜炜

关键词 ：大数据能力, 知识耦合, 新创企业, 创业绩效, IT—业务战略匹配

收稿日期: 2022-10-24 修回日期: 2023-02-21

ZTFLH:

F272.4

基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目（71402110）；江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目（2020SJA1357）；浙江省科技计划软科学重点项目（2020C25030）

作者简介: 袁勇志（1962—），男，江苏如皋人，博士，苏州大学商学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为知识创新；诸葛凯（1994—），男，山东临沂人，苏州大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向为数字化转型与知识管理；张勇（1970—），男，内蒙古鄂尔多斯人，中国计量大学经济与管理学院教授，研究方向为标准化与知识管理；林炜炜（1999—），女，浙江杭州人，苏州大学商学院硕士研究生，研究方向为企业绿色创新。本文通讯作者：诸葛凯。

引用本文:

袁勇志,诸葛凯,张勇,林炜炜. 知识耦合视阈下大数据能力对新创企业创业绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(8): 106-116.
Yuan Yongzhi,Zhuge Kai,Zhang Yong,Lin Weiwei. The Influence Mechanism of Big Data Capability on the Entrepreneurial Performance of New Ventures from the Perspective of Knowledge Coupling. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2024, 41(8): 106-116.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022100609 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2024/V41/I8/106

[1] 杨艳,王理,廖祖君.数据要素市场化配置与区域经济发展——基于数据交易平台的视角[J].社会科学研究,2021,43(6):38-52.
[2] GHASEMAGHAEI M, CALIC G. Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: big data is not always better data [J].Journal of Business Research, 2020,108: 147-162.
[3] 李文博.大数据驱动情景下数字创业商业模式创新关键影响因素——话语分析方法的一项探索性研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(16):67-76.
[4] BRANDS K C M A. Big data and business intelligence for management accountants [J].Strategic Finance, 2014,95: 64-65.
[5] PASCHOU T, RAPACCINI M, ADRODEGARI F, et al. Digital servitization in manufacturing: a systematic literature review and research agenda [J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2020,89: 278-292.
[6] REIBENSPIESS V, DRECHSLER K, ECKHARDT A, et al. Tapping into the wealth of employees' ideas: design principles for a digital intrapreneurship platform [J].Information & Management, 2022, 59(3): 103287.
[7] YANG C, HUANG Q, LI Z, et al. Big Data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges [J].International Journal of Digital Earth, 2017, 10(1): 13-53.
[8] 唐彬,卢艳秋,叶英平.大数据能力视角下平台企业知识创造模型研究[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(7):123-129.
[9] 张吉昌,龙静,陈锋.大数据能力、知识动态能力与商业模式创新——创新合法性的调节效应[J].经济与管理,2022,36(5):19-28.
[10] YAYAVARAM S, CHEN W R. Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: the moderating role of technological complexity [J].Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(3): 377-396.
[11] CANER T, TYLER B B. The effects of knowledge depth and scope on the relationship between R & D alliances and new product development [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(5): 808-824.
[12] GKYPALI A, FILIOU D, TSEKOURAS K. R&D collaborations: is diversity enhancing innovation performance[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017,118: 143-152.
[13] CARLO J L, LYYTINEN K, ROSE G M. A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms [J].MIS Quarterly, 2012,36: 865-895.
[14] MIKALEF P, BOURA M, LEKAKOS G, et al. Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment [J].British Journal of Management, 2019, 30(2): 272-298.
[15] TEECE D J, PISANO G, SHUEN A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.
[16] VIDGEN R, SHAW S, GRANT D B. Management challenges in creating value from business analytics [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 261(2): 626-639.
[17] 李新春,梁强,宋丽红.外部关系—内部能力平衡与新创企业成长——基于创业者行为视角的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2010,27(12):97-107.
[18] CHRISMAN J J, BAUERSCHMIDT A, HOFERC W. The determinants of new venture performance: an extended model[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1998, 23(1): 5-29.
[19] 申佳,李雪灵,马文杰.不同成长阶段下新企业关系强度与绩效研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(8):115-122.
[20] 何会涛,袁勇志.海外人才创业双重网络嵌入及其交互对创业绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(1):66-73.
[21] WAMBA S F, GUNASEKARAN A, AKTER S, et al. Big data analytics and firm performance: effects of dynamic capabilities [J].Journal of Business Research, 2017,70: 356-365.
[22] HAGSTROM M. High-performance analytics fuels innovation and inclusive growth: Use big data, hyperconnectivity and speed to intelligence to get true value in the digital economy[J]. Journal of Advanced Analytics, 2012, 2(3): 31-44.
[23] MENGUC B, AUH S, YANNOPOULOS P. Customer and supplier involvement in design: the moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2): 313-328.
[24] COLOMBELLI A, KRAFFT J, QUATRARO F. Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firms [J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80(8): 1469-1483.
[25] CHEN D Q, PRESTON D S, SWINK M. How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2015, 32(4): 4-39.
[26] AGOSTINO M, DONATI C, TRIVIERI F. External knowledge flows and innovation capacity: the Italian service industries [J].International Review of Applied Economics, 2020, 34(3): 342-360.
[27] RYOO S Y, KIM K K. The impact of knowledge complementarities on supply chain performance through knowledge exchange [J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6): 3029-3040.
[28] XU S. Balancing the two knowledge dimensions in innovation efforts: an empirical examination among pharmaceutical firms [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4): 610-621.
[29] TANRIVERDI H, VENKATRAMAN N. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms [J].Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(2): 97-119.
[30] 姚艳虹,张翠平.知识域耦合、知识创新能力与企业创新绩效——环境不确定性和战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(23):76-84.
[31] 于飞,刘明霞,王凌峰,等.知识耦合对制造企业绿色创新的影响机理——冗余资源的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(3):54-65,76.
[32] 易法敏,朱洁.ICT赋能的扶贫平台商业模式创新[J].管理评论,2019,31(7):123-132.
[33] REICH B H, BENBASAT I. Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives [J].MIS Quarterly, 2000,24: 81-113.
[34] KROH J, LUETJEN H, GLOBOCNIK D, et al. Use and efficacy of information technology in innovation processes: the specific role of servitization [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2018, 35(5): 720-741.
[35] LIANG H, WANG N, XUE Y, et al. Unraveling the alignment paradox: how does business-IT alignment shape organizational agility[J].Information Systems Research, 2017, 28(4): 863-879.
[36] 何会涛,袁勇志.双维市场导向、本地网络嵌入与海外人才在华创业绩效研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(1):105-114.
[37] GERSCHEWSKI S, XIAO S S. Beyond financial indicators: an assessment of the measurement of performance for international new ventures [J].International Business Review, 2015, 24(4): 615-629.
[38] KARAHANNA E, PRESTON D S. The effect of social capital of the relationship between the CIO and top management team on firm performance [J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 30(1): 15-56.
[39] PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, LEE J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879.
[40] STEININGER D M. Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: a review and agenda for IT-associated and digital entrepreneurship research [J].Information Systems Journal, 2019, 29(2): 363-407.