平台治理如何影响互补者知识共享——平台开放度的控制与激励作用

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2023010255

科技进步与对策

2023, Vol. 40

Issue (18): 120-131 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023010255

知识科学与知识工程

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

平台治理如何影响互补者知识共享——平台开放度的控制与激励作用

高辉,张建宇,王师静云

（天津财经大学商学院，天津 300222）

How Does Platform Governance Affect Complementors' Knowledge Sharing?The Control and Incentive Roles of Platform Openness

Gao Hui,Zhang Jianyu,Wang Shijingyun

(Business School, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1436 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要促进互补者知识共享和协同创新是平台治理的重要目标。根据竞合理论，从平台开放度这一兼顾控制和激励的治理手段入手，探讨平台开放度对互补者知识共享的作用机制。通过对创新型平台上320家应用程序开发企业的调查研究，结果表明：平台开放度中的可访问性与透明度对互补者知识共享具有负向影响，且该影响在知识复杂性较高的互补者中会得到缓解，在知识多样性较高的互补者中会被放大；此外，将知识复杂性机制引入战略独特性后，存在三阶调节作用，即战略独特性越低、知识复杂性越高，可访问性与透明度对互补者知识共享的负向影响越弱。强调平台治理政策与手段设计对互补者交互和价值创造具有重要影响，在兼顾互补者异质性的同时，进一步丰富了平台治理研究。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	高辉
	张建宇
	王师静云

关键词 ：平台治理, 平台开放度, 知识共享, 知识属性, 战略独特性

收稿日期: 2023-01-13 修回日期: 2023-03-23

ZTFLH:

F272.4

基金资助:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目（TJGL21-033）

作者简介: 高辉（1989—），女，河北沧州人，博士，天津财经大学商学院讲师、硕士生导师，研究方向为战略与创新管理；张建宇（1979—），男，江苏如皋人，博士，天津财经大学商学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为知识管理；王师静云（1996—），女，内蒙古通辽人，天津财经大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向为知识管理。本文通讯作者：张建宇。

引用本文:

高辉,张建宇,王师静云. 平台治理如何影响互补者知识共享——平台开放度的控制与激励作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(18): 120-131.
Gao Hui,Zhang Jianyu,Wang Shijingyun. How Does Platform Governance Affect Complementors' Knowledge Sharing?The Control and Incentive Roles of Platform Openness. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2023, 40(18): 120-131.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2023010255 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2023/V40/I18/120

[1] JACOBIDES M G, CENNAMO C, GAWER A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8): 2255-2276.
[2] FOERDERER J. Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: evidence from Apple's worldwide developers conference[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(10): 4772-4787.
[3] CHEN L, TONG T W, TANG S, et al. Governance and design of digital platforms: a review and future research directions on a meta-organization[J]. Journal of Management, 2022, 48(1): 147-184.
[4] BENLIAN A, HILKERT D, HESS T. How open is this platform:The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors' perspective[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2015, 30(3): 209-228.
[5] EISENMANN T R, PARKER G, VAN ALSTYNE M. Opening platforms: how, when and why[J]. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 2009, 6: 131-162.
[6] BOUDREAU K J. Platform boundary choices & governance: opening-up while still coordinating and orchestrating[M]//Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms. Emerald Publishing Limited,2017.
[7] CHOI G, NAM C, KIM S. The impacts of technology platform openness on application developers' intention to continuously use a platform:from an ecosystem perspective[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2019, 43(2): 140-153.
[8] BOUDREAU K. Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(10): 1849-1872.
[9] ZHANG Y, LI J, TONG T W. Platform governance matters: how platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2022, 43(3): 599-626.
[10] HANNAH D P, EISENHARDT K M. How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(12): 3163-3192.
[11] 刘凤朝, 罗蕾, 张淑慧. 知识属性、知识关系与研发合作企业创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11): 155-163.
[12] FLEMING L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 117-132.
[13] TENKASI R V, BOLAND R J. Exploring knowledge diversity in knowledge intensive firms: a new role for information systems[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1996, 9(1): 79-91.
[14] 陈晓红, 周源. 基于扎根理论的开源软件项目成员间知识共享模式质性研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(6): 901-909.
[15] HAGIU A, WRIGHT J. Controlling vs. enabling[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(2): 577-595.
[16] NAMBISAN S, BARON R A. On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 125: 520-532.
[17] GHAZAWNEH A, HENFRIDSSON O. Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2013, 23(2): 173-192.
[18] WEST J. How open is open enough: melding proprietary and open source platform strategies[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(7): 1259-1285.
[19] MENON K, KRKKINEN H, WUEST T. Industrial internet platform provider and end-user perceptions of platform openness impacts[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2020, 27(4): 363-389.
[20] KHANNA T. The scope of alliances[J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(3): 340-355.
[21] LAVIE D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 638-658.
[22] HOFFMANN W, LAVIE D, REUER J J, et al. The interplay of competition and cooperation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(12): 3033-3052.
[23] GRANT R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 109-122.
[24] YOO D K, ROH J J, CHO S, et al. Coopetition in a platform ecosystem: from the complementors' perspective[J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2022,23: 1-24.
[25] ZHU F, LIU Q. Competing with complementors: an empirical look at Amazon. com[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(10): 2618-2642.
[26] ARAL S, VAN ALSTYNE M. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2011, 117(1): 90-171.
[27] PARKER G, VAN ALSTYNE M. Innovation, openness, and platform control[J]. Management Science, 2018, 64(7): 3015-3032.
[28] 刘洋, 董久钰, 魏江. 数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(7): 198-217,219.
[29] BELLEFLAMME P, PEITZ M. Managing competition on a two-sided platform[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2019, 28(1): 5-22.
[30] JANSEN S, BRINKKEMPER S, SOUER J, et al. Shades of gray: opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2012, 85(7): 1495-1510.
[31] VAN ANGEREN J, ALVES C, JANSEN S. Can we ask you to collaborate?analyzing app developer relationships in commercial platform ecosystems[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2016, 113: 430-445.
[32] CENNAMO C, OZALP H, KRETSCHMER T. Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements[J]. Information Systems Research, 2018, 29(2): 461-478.
[33] KAPOOR R, AGARWAL S. Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems[J]. Organization Science, 2017, 28(3): 531-551.
[34] ZANDER U, KOGUT B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test[J]. Organization Science, 1995, 6(1): 76-92.
[35] POLLOK P, AMFT A, DIENER K, et al. Knowledge diversity and team creativity: how hobbyists beat professional designers in creating novel board games[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(8): 104174.
[36] MCINTYRE D P, SRINIVASAN A, CHINTAKANANDA A. The persistence of platforms: the role of network, platform, and complementor attributes[J]. Long Range Planning, 2021, 54(5): 101987.
[37] CARLILE P R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(5): 555-568.
[38] FOERDERER J, KUDE T, SCHUETZ S W, et al. Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: antecedents and consequences for platform governance[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2019, 29(1): 119-144.
[39] VENKATRAMAN N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(8): 942-962.
[40] HAANS R F. What's the value of being different when everyone is?the effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(1): 3-27.
[41] ZHAO E Y, FISHER G, LOUNSBURY M, et al. Optimal distinctiveness: broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(1): 93-113.
[42] TAVALAEI M M, CENNAMO C. In search of complementarities within and across platform ecosystems: complementors' relative standing and performance in mobile apps ecosystems[J]. Long Range Planning, 2021, 54(5): 101994.
[43] 赵蓓, 陈三可. 内部知识多样性与组织突破式创新——外部知识获取与知识整合机制的调节作用[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(1): 58-68.
[44] LI H, ATUAHENE-GIMA K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6): 1123-1134.
[45] 马文聪, 叶阳平, 徐梦丹,等. “两情相悦”还是“门当户对”:产学研合作伙伴匹配性及其对知识共享和合作绩效的影响机制[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(6): 95-106.
[46] 王节祥, 陈威如. 平台演化与生态参与者战略[J]. 清华管理评论, 2019,10(12): 76-85.