组织能动应对内部制度复杂性的权力机制——基于西交利物浦大学的案例研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020100695

科技进步与对策

2021, Vol. 38

Issue (12): 32-41 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020100695

科技管理创新

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

组织能动应对内部制度复杂性的权力机制——基于西交利物浦大学的案例研究

胥思齐¹,席酉民^1,2,徐钊¹,梁朝高¹

（1.西安交通大学管理学院，陕西西安 710049；2.西交利物浦大学，江苏苏州 215123）

A Study on the Power Mechanism of Organization's Agentic Response to Internal Institutional Complexity：Case Study Based on Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

Xu Siqi¹,Xi Youmin^1,2,Xu Zhao¹,Liang Chaogao¹

（1.School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China;2.Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University,Suzhou 215123,China）

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (5)

全文: PDF (2884 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要组织如何有效应对内部制度复杂性是目前学界与业界关注的热点问题。现有研究虽然认为组织需要能动应对内部制度复杂性并提出一些个体层实现机制，但如何从组织层面整体实现能动应对内部制度复杂性的机制尚不明确。从权力结构出发，通过对西交利物浦大学进行探索性单案例分析，挖掘组织能动应对内部制度复杂性的权力机制模型。结果发现，能动应对内部制度复杂性的关键在于不耦合的认知与实践双重权力结构：组织层级式权力实践结构与网络式权力认知结构不但分别区隔、整合了多重制度逻辑诉求冲突，而且共同激励多重制度逻辑的持续弹性混合，能够有效应对内部制度复杂性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胥思齐
	席酉民
	徐钊
	梁朝高

关键词 ：制度复杂性, 制度逻辑, 权力结构, 权力动态

收稿日期: 2020-10-29 修回日期: 2020-11-12

ZTFLH:

C936

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（71232014，71772152，71872145）

作者简介: 胥思齐（1991—），女，黑龙江大庆人，西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为制度逻辑、制度复杂性、社会企业；席酉民（1957—），男，陕西西安人，博士，西安交通大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，西交利物浦大学执行校长，研究方向为和谐管理理论；徐钊（1993—），女，江苏淮安人，西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为身份理论；梁朝高（1990—），男，广东茂名人，西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为和谐管理理论、本土理论。本文通讯作者：胥思齐。

引用本文:

胥思齐,席酉民,徐钊,梁朝高. 组织能动应对内部制度复杂性的权力机制——基于西交利物浦大学的案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(12): 32-41.
Xu Siqi,Xi Youmin,Xu Zhao,Liang Chaogao. A Study on the Power Mechanism of Organization's Agentic Response to Internal Institutional Complexity：Case Study Based on Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2021, 38(12): 32-41.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2020100695 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2021/V38/I12/32

[1] THORNTON P H,OCASIO W.Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry,1958-1990 [J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,105(3): 801-843.
[2] 杨勃，杜晓君，蔡灵莎.组织身份落差对跨国并购合法性的影响机制——基于上汽和TCL的探索性案例研究 [J].经济管理，2016，38(9): 76-88.
[3] GREENWOOD R,RAYNARD M,KODEIH F,et al.Institutional complexity and organizational responses [J].Academy of Management Annals,2011,5(1): 317-371.
[4] THORNTON P H,OCASIO W,LOUNSBURY M.The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture,structure,and process [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2012: 6-11,64-65.
[5] FINI R,JOURDAN J,PERKMANN M.Social valuation across multiple audiences: the interplay of ability and identity judgments [J].Academy of Management Journal,2018,61(6): 2230-2264.
[6] RAYNARD M.Deconstructing complexity: configurations of institutional complexity and structural hybridity [J].Strategic Organization,2016,14(4): 310-335.
[7] MARQUIS C,LOUNSBURY M.Vive la resistance: consolidation and the institutional contingency of professional counter-mobilization in U.S.Banking [J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4): 799-820.
[8] BATTILANA J,LEE M.Advancing research on hybrid organizing-insights from the study of social enterprises [J].Academy of Management Annals,2014,8(1): 397-441.
[9] 李宏贵，蒋艳芬.多重制度逻辑的微观实践研究 [J].财贸研究，2017，28(2): 80-89.
[10] GUMUSAY A A,SMETS M,MORRIS T."God at work": engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity [J].Academy of Management Journal,2020,63(1): 124-154.
[11] SMITH W K,BESHAROV M L.Bowing before dual gods: how structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2019,64(1): 1-44.
[12] PERKMANN M,MCKELVEY M,PHILLIPS N.Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: how organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics [J].Organization Science,2019,30(2): 298-318.
[13] BESHAROV M L,SMITH W K.Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications [J].Academy of Management Review,2014,39(3): 364-381.
[14] JARZABKOWSKI P,MATTHIESEN J,VAN DE VEN A.Doing which work?a practice approach to institutional pluralism [M]//T B LAWRENCE,R SUDDABY,B LECA,eds.Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations.Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press,2009: 284-316.
[15] ASHFORTH B E,REINGEN P H.Functions of dysfunction: managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative [J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2014,59(3): 474-516.
[16] 邓少军，芮明杰，赵付春.组织响应制度复杂性：分析框架与研究模型 [J].外国经济与管理，2018，40(8): 3-16.
[17] MUNIR K A.A loss of power in institutional theory [J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2015,24(1): 90-92.
[18] KERN A,LAGUECIR A,LECA B.Behind smoke and mirrors: a political approach to decoupling [J].Organization Studies,2018,39(4): 543-564.
[19] CANHILAL S K,LEPORI B,SEEBER M.Decision-making power and institutional logic in higher education institutions: a comparative analysis of European universities [J].Research in the Sociology of Organizations,2016,45: 169-194.
[20] HARDY C,CLEGG S.Some dare call it power [M]// S R CLEGG,et al.The sage handbook of organization studies (2nd edition).London: Sage Publications,2006: 754-775.
[21] VAN BUNDEREN L,GREER L L,VAN KNIPPENBERG D.When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: the pivotal role of team power structures [J].Academy of Management Journal,2018,61(3): 1100-1130.
[22] GALINSKY A D,GRUENFELD D H,MAGEE J C.From power to action [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85(3): 453-466.
[23] KELTNER D,GRUENFELD D H,ANDERSON C.Power,approach,and inhibition [J].Psychological Review,2003,110(2): 265-284.
[24] HARDY C,PHILLIPS N.Strategies of engagement: lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain [J].Organization Science,1998,9(2): 217-230.
[25] 杰克·奈特.制度与社会冲突(第2版) [M].周伟林,译.上海：上海人民出版社，2017: 87-89.
[26] 陈春花，刘祯.案例研究的基本方法——对经典文献的综述 [J].管理案例研究与评论，2010，3(2): 175-182.
[27] 贾旭东，衡量.基于“扎根精神”的中国本土管理理论构建范式初探 [J].管理学报，2016，13(3): 336-346.
[28] DOBIJA D,GROSSI G,STRZELCZYK W.Shifting logics and performance measurement practices in hybrid universities [R].Working Paper,2017.
[29] BOITIER M,RIVIRE A.Management control systems,vectors of a managerial logic: institutional change and conflicts of logics at university [J].Comptabilite-Controle-Audit,2016,22(3): 47-79.
[30] MEYER R E,HLLERER M A.Laying a smoke screen: ambiguity and neutralization as strategic responses to intra-institutional complexity [J].Strategic Organization,2016,14(4): 373-406.
[31] 徐松鹤，韩传峰，平健.应急管理组织复杂性三维评价模型 [J].中国科技论坛，2014，30(6): 37-43.
[32] 苗东升.文化系统论要略(四)——兼谈文化复杂性 [J].系统科学学报，2015，23(1): 1-6.
[33] 朱丽叶·科宾，安塞尔姆·施特劳斯.质性研究的基础：形成扎根理论的程序与方法(第3版) [M].朱光明,译.重庆：重庆大学出版社，2015: 170-205.
[34] 罗瑾琏，易明，钟竞.双元领导对亲社会性沉默的影响[J].管理科学，2018，31(2): 105-119.
[35] GREVE H R,ZHANG C M.Institutional logics and power sources: merger and acquisition decisions [J].Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(2): 671-694.