互依性、知识获取与员工创新行为关系研究：一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019110576

科技进步与对策

2021, Vol. 38

Issue (5): 134-142 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2019110576

科技人才培育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

互依性、知识获取与员工创新行为关系研究：一个有调节的中介模型

王海花,杜梅,孙芹,李玉

（上海大学管理学院，上海200444）

Research on Interdependence, Knowledge Acquisition and Employee Innovation Behavior:a Moderated Mediation Model

Wang Haihua,Du Mei,Sun Qin,Li Yu

(School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1329 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要信息化与知识经济时代，创新成为个体获得竞争优势的关键因素之一。以中国情境下上海319位企业成员为调查样本，基于资源依赖理论和知识管理理论，构建一个有调节的中介模型。运用结构方程模型，考察任务互依性、目标互依性、奖励互依性影响员工创新行为的机制路径，检验知识获取的中介作用和任务冲突的调节作用。结果发现：任务互依性、目标互依性、奖励互依性对知识获取有显著正向作用；知识获取对员工创新行为有显著正向作用；知识获取在任务互依性、目标互依性、奖励互依性与员工创新行为之间起中介作用；任务冲突在目标互依性与知识获取的关系中起调节作用；任务冲突调节知识获取在目标互依性与员工创新行为关系中的中介作用，在高任务冲突情境下，该中介作用更显著。研究结果拓展了中国情境下员工创新行为理论体系，能够为企业管理者寻求更多管理策略提供指导。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王海花
	杜梅
	孙芹
	李玉

关键词 ：任务互依性, 目标互依性, 奖励互依性, 知识获取, 任务冲突, 员工创新行为

收稿日期: 2019-11-20 修回日期: 2020-02-25

ZTFLH:

F272.92

基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目（19YJA630076）；教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（15JZD017）;上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究领域重点项目（19692104300）

作者简介: 王海花（1983—），女，山东聊城人，博士，上海大学管理学院副教授，研究方向为创新与知识管理、社会网络等；杜梅（1995—），女，江苏徐州人，上海大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新与知识管理、组织与人力资源管理；孙芹（1995—），女，山东临沂人，上海大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新与知识管理、产学研协同创新；李玉（1997—），女，山东枣庄人，上海大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新与知识管理。本文通讯作者：杜梅。

引用本文:

王海花,杜梅,孙芹,李玉. 互依性、知识获取与员工创新行为关系研究：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(5): 134-142.
Wang Haihua,Du Mei,Sun Qin,Li Yu. Research on Interdependence, Knowledge Acquisition and Employee Innovation Behavior:a Moderated Mediation Model. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2021, 38(5): 134-142.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2019110576 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2021/V38/I5/134

[1] HSU M L A, CHEN F H. The cross-level mediating effect of psychological capital on the organizational innovation climate-employee innovation behavior relationship[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2017, 51(2): 128-139.
[2] SHALLEY C E, ZHOU J, OLDHAM G R. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here[J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(6): 933-958.
[3] ANDERSON N, POTOCNIK K, ZHOU J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1297-1333.
[4] 王辉, 常阳. 组织创新氛围、工作动机对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2017, 30(3):55-66.
[5] CAMPION M A, PAPPER E M, MEDSKER G J. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(2): 429-452.
[6] FONG P S W, MEN C, LUO J, et al. Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence[J]. Management Decision, 2018, 56(2): 329-343.
[7] HAWRYSZKIEWYCZ I, BINSAWAD M. Exploring how environmental and personal factors influence knowledge sharing behavior leads to innovative work behavior[J]. Information Systems Development, 2018, 26: 97-112.
[8] 陈建勋, 郑雪强, 王涛. “对事不对人”亦或“对人不对事”——高管团队冲突对组织探索式学习行为的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(5): 91-103.
[9] BAI Y, HAN G H, HARMS P D. Team conflict mediates the effects of organizational politics on employee performance: a cross-level analysis in China[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015: 1-15.
[10] LEE C, LIN Y, HUANG H, HUANG W W, et al. The effects of task interdependence, team cooperation, and team conflict on job performance[J]. Social Behavior and Personality, 2014, 43(4): 529-536.
[11] 田立法, 张光磊, 席枫, 等. 团队冲突、冲突缓解、凝聚力与团队绩效: 一个纵向研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018(1):113-121.
[12] ARTHUR W, EDWARDS B D, BELL S T, et al. Team task analysis: identifying tasks and jobs that are team based[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2005, 47(3): 654-669.
[13] KIGGUNDU M N. Task interdependence and the theory of job design[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6(3): 499-508.
[14] COURTRIGHT S H, THURGOOD G R, STEWART G L, et al. Structural interdependence in teams: an integrative framework and Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(6): 1825-1846.
[15] WAGEMAN R. Erratum: interdependence and group effectiveness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 367-367.
[16] PENG J, WANG Z, CHEN X. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? a moderated dual-path model[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019(10): 1-15.
[17] ANAND S, VIDYARTHI P, ROLNICKI S. Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors: contextual effects of leader power distance and group task interdependence[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2017, 29(4): 489-500.
[18] SAAVEDRA R, EARLEY P C, VAN DYNE L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(1): 61-72.
[19] 李嘉.互依性对员工建言行为的影响研究: 人格特质的调节作用[J]. 学海, 2019, 3(26): 176-182.
[20] CONWAY J M, MITRA K. Personality-task interdependence interaction in predicting salespeople's organizational citizenship behavior[M]. New York:Springer International Publishing, 2015: 228-228.
[21] 李纲, 陈静静, 杨雪. 网络能力、知识获取与企业服务创新绩效的关系研究——网络规模的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(2): 59-68.
[22] DREES J M, HEUGENS P P M A R. Synthesizing and Extending resource dependence theory: a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 39(6): 1666-1698.
[23] WAGEMAN R, GORDON F M. As the twig is bent: how group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(6): 687-700.
[24] REN F, ZHANG J. Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees' innovative behavior[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2015, 27(1): 16-23.
[25] COHEN W M, LEVINTHAL D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 35(1): 125-128．
[26] GRANT, ROBERT M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 109-122.
[27] 党兴华, 弓志刚. 多维邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作的影响——基于中国共同专利数据的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(10): 1590-1600.
[28] HUANG J C. Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict: the moderating role of team goal orientation and conflictmanagement[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2010, 21(3): 334-355.
[29] LI C R, LI C X, LIN C J. The effect of individual task conflict on employee creativity: a moderated mediation model[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2019(31): 112-124.
[30] HüLSHEGER U R, ANDERSON N, SALGADO J F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1128-1145.
[31] FARH J L, LEE C, FARH C I C. Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6): 1173-1180.
[32] DE DREU C K W, WEINGART L R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(4): 741-749.
[33] CHUANG C H, JACKSON S E, JIANG Y. Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 42(2): 524-554.
[34] SCOTT S G, BRUCE R A. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(3): 580-607.
[35] JEHN K A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3): 530-557.
[36] 马璐, 朱双. 组织认同与关系冲突视角下不当督导对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(21): 150-155.
[37] LI N, ZHAO H H, WALTER S L, et al. Achieving more with less: extra milers' behavioral influences in teams[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(4): 1025-1039.
[38] TEPPER B J. Consequences of abusive supervision[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2): 178-190.
[39] GORLA N, SOMERS T M, WONG B. Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2010, 19(3): 207-228.
[40] GU J, CHEN Z, HUANG Q, et al. A multilevel analysis of the relationship between task conflict and creativity in inter-organizational teams[J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2016（24）: 109-126.
[41] BERTUCCI A, JOHNSON D W, JOHNSON R T, et al. Effect of task and goal interdependence on achievement, cooperation, and support among elementary school students[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2016（79）: 97-105.
[42] SEDATOLE K L, SWANEY A M, WOODS A. The implicit incentive effects of horizontal monitoring and team member dependence on individual performance[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2015, 33(3): 889-919.
[43] CERNE M, HERNAUS T, DYSVIK A, et al. The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior[J]. Human Resource Management Journal, 2017, 27(2): 281-299.
[44] 王雁飞, 王丽璇, 朱瑜. 基于资源保存理论视角的心理资本与员工创新行为关系研究[J].商业经济与管理, 2019,39(3): 40-49.