In recent years, the VUCA characteristics including volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity have become increasingly prominent, posing severe survival challenges for enterprises. However, some firms have managed to survive, recover, and even thrive through adverse shocks, largely due to their organizational resilience—a critical capability that enables firms to maintain stability and rebound swiftly from unexpected disruptions. This resilience has become indispensable for corporate survival and sustainable development in today's volatile environment. Meanwhile, the digital wave has swept through, with emerging technologies like artificial intelligence establishing key competitive advantages for enterprises. These technologies are being integrated into daily operations and management models, significantly enhancing stability and recovery capabilities during crises, thereby forming a close connection with organizational resilience.
While existing research has examined the determinants of resilience in manufacturing enterprises from various perspectives, it has yet to fully account for the complex interplay among digital technologies, strategic positioning within industrial chains, and internal resource allocation decisions, all of which are crucial in dynamic environments. It is worth noting that the enabling effect of AI technology on enterprise resilience and its realization mechanisms have not been systematically clarified and empirically tested in the existing literature, which will become a key bottleneck to deepen the understanding of the formation of enterprise resilience in the digital era.
Therefore, to address the gap, this study draws on resource-based theory and utilizes panel data from Chinese listed manufacturing firms (2011-2023). By applying text analysis to measure AI application intensity based on the frequency of AI-related keywords in corporate disclosures, the study quantifies the development level of AI technology adoption and examines its impact on enterprise resilience. Meanwhile, this study explores the specific impact channels of AI technology application on corporate resilience from the perspective of multi-dimensional effects across the upstream, midstream, and downstream of the industrial chain, and analyzes the differentiated impacts of AI technology application under different scenarios.
The research findings indicate that, first, AI technology application significantly enhances enterprise resilience. AI technology positively strengthens corporate resilience through three key mechanisms: empowering digital innovation in the upstream sector, optimizing digital operations management in the midstream sector, and providing digital marketing services in the downstream sector. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that both external factors (industry competition intensity) and internal resource foundations (digital transformation speed, factor intensity, and fixed asset investment levels) significantly amplify AI's positive impact on corporate resilience. However, the analysis of strategic resource allocation patterns shows that improved ESG performance creates "resource crowding-out" effects, while excessive resource reserves lead to "resource surplus," thereby diminishing AI's catalytic role. In summary, the study innovatively constructs an industrial chain collaborative analysis framework, revealing the dynamic law and influence boundary of artificial intelligence technology penetration enhancing enterprise resilience.
Thus, this study proposes the following practical management recommendations for both the Chinese government and enterprises. The government should focus on building an AI technology application support system and strengthening industrial chain coordination policies, with a focus promoting the integrated application of digital technologies represented by AI across the upstream, midstream, and downstream segments of the industrial chain. Enterprises should actively adopt digital technologies represented by AI, optimize industrial chain structures, enhance digital intelligence capabilities, and proactively leverage external environmental pressures to forge their own resilience.
This study contributes to the literature in three innovative ways. First, it introduces an industry-ecosystem perspective to systematically examine how AI application enhances resilience in China's manufacturing sector, bridging a theoretical gap between AI and organizational resilience. Second, it unpacks the mechanisms through which AI affects resilience via digital innovation, operational optimization, and marketing enhancement, while also highlighting how external environments, internal resources, and strategic allocation patterns shape these effects. Third, it offers a comprehensive theoretical lens for understanding the evolutionary path of AI-enabled resilience, providing actionable insights for both scholars and practitioners in the digital transformation era.
[1] 王海花, 李雅洁, 李烨, 等. 数字化变革背景下技术多元化对企业韧性的影响[J].系统管理学报, 2024, 33(2): 391-403.
[2] 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 等. 数智赋能: 危机情境下组织韧性如何形成——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 84-104, 7.
[3] 刘潇,李家宝.人工智能创新生态系统中的技术互补与协同创新[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(3):14-26.
[4] 李玉花, 林雨昕, 李丹丹, 等. 人工智能技术应用如何影响企业创新[J].中国工业经济, 2024,41(10): 155-173.
[5] 张少华, 朱雪冰, 陈鑫, 等. 中国数字经济产业链的规模测度与循环研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(3): 5-24.
[6] GOLDFARB A, TUCKER C. Digital economics[J].Journal of Economic Literature, 2019, 57(1): 3-43.
[7] 孙群力,谢滨泽.产业智能化、劳动力结构与技能溢价[J].统计与决策,2023,39(9):179-184.
[8] 苗翠芬. 人工智能与制造业服务化[J].经济与管理研究, 2023, 44(7): 22-39.
[9] 韩清, 陈澍. 人工智能技术应用与企业内部薪酬差距[J].上海经济研究, 2025, 37(2): 79-92.
[10] 徐红丹, 王玖河. 人工智能如何赋能企业新质生产力[J].科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(7): 1-8.
[11] GAO Q, CHENG C M, SUN G L. Big data application, factor allocation, and green innovation in Chinese manufacturing enterprises[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 192: 122567.
[12] LI C M, XU Y, ZHENG H, et al. Artificial intelligence, resource reallocation, and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from China's listed companies[J].Resources Policy, 2023, 81: 103324.
[13] BAHRAMI H, EVANS S. Super-flexibility for real-time adaptation: perspectives from Silicon Valley[J].California Management Review, 2011, 53(3): 21-39.
[14] KITANO H.Biological robustness[J].Nature Reviews Genetics,2004,5(11):826-837.
[15] WILLIAMS T A, GRUBER D A, SUTCLIFFE K M, et al. Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams[J].Academy of Management Annals, 2017, 11(2): 733-769.
[16] 蒋峦, 凌宇鹏, 张吉昌, 等. 数字化转型如何影响企业韧性——基于双元创新视角[J].技术经济, 2022, 41(1): 1-11.
[17] BABINA T, FEDYK A, HE A, et al. Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2024, 151: 103745.
[18] GHASEMAGHAEI M, CALIC G. Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: big data is not always better data[J].Journal of Business Research, 2020, 108: 147-162.
[19] CHRISTIAN A, KAI I V. Ecosystem effects of the Industrial Internet of Things on manufacturing companies[J].Acta Infologica,2017, 1(2): 99-108.
[20] HILLMANN J, GUENTHER E. Organizational resilience: a valuable construct for management research[J].International Journal of Management Reviews, 2021, 23(1): 7-44.
[21] 石峰, 杨扬, 袁韵, 等. 人工智能驱动下的营销变革[J].中国管理科学, 2025, 33(1): 111-123.
[22] 乔朋华, 薛睿, 韩先锋. 数字营销何以激发中小企业创新——基于信息动态能力的中介作用[J].南开管理评论, 2024, 27(5): 40-50, 77.
[23] MARTIN R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks[J].Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12(1): 1-32.
[24] 黄先海, 王瀚迪, 孙涌铭, 等. 数字技术与企业出口质量升级——来自专利文本机器学习的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(12): 69-89.
[25] 姜丽群, 郭昕, 袁梓晋. 跨国企业母国创新网络对国际化创新绩效的影响——高管国际化背景与企业数字化的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(11): 94-103.
[26] 甄红线, 王玺, 方红星, 等. 知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(11): 62-79.
[27] 程聪, 胡嘉阳. 数字能力对在华跨国公司数字创新绩效的影响机制——基于fsQCA的研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(19): 91-99.
[28] 巫强, 姚雨秀. 企业数字化转型与供应链配置: 集中化还是多元化[J].中国工业经济, 2023,40(8): 99-117.
[29] 谢富胜, 邓可为, 江楠. 数字平台与制造业企业利润率[J].经济研究, 2025, 60(2): 90-106.