案例研究专栏

精益数字化赋能制造企业组织韧性的生成逻辑与作用机理——基于耗散结构理论的多案例研究

  • 霍春辉 ,
  • 杨艳茹 ,
  • 何地 ,
  • 荆树伟
展开
  • (1.辽宁大学 经济学部商学院;2.辽宁大学 经济学部亚澳商学院,辽宁 沈阳 110136;3.山西财经大学 管理科学与工程学院,山西 太原 030006)
霍春辉(1977—),男,辽宁沈阳人,博士,辽宁大学党委常委、副校长,经济学部商学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为战略管理、创新管理;杨艳茹(1997—),女,山西襄汾人,辽宁大学经济学部商学院博士研究生,研究方向为数字化管理、创新管理;何地(1989—),男,辽宁沈阳人,博士,辽宁大学经济学部亚澳商学院副教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为创新管理;荆树伟(1986—),男,山西朔州人,博士,山西财经大学管理科学与工程学院副院长、教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为精益管理创新、精益数字化。通讯作者:何地。

收稿日期: 2025-03-03

  修回日期: 2025-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD148);国家社会科学基金一般项目(24BGL033);辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题(2025lslybwzzkt-138);辽宁大学亚洲研究中心亚洲问题研究一般项目(Y202408)

The Generative Logic and Mechanism of Organizational Resilience in Manufacturing Enterprises Empowered by Lean Digitalization: A Multiple-Case Study Based on Dissipative Structure Theory

  • Huo Chunhui ,
  • Yang Yanru ,
  • He Di ,
  • Jing Shuwei
Expand
  • (1. Business School, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University;2. Asia-Australia Business College, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China;3. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Received date: 2025-03-03

  Revised date: 2025-06-28

  Online published: 2025-11-10

摘要

在异质资源稀缺、御险能力薄弱情境下,精益数字化如何影响制造企业组织韧性是亟待解答的问题。基于耗散结构理论,采用多案例研究方法探索精益数字化如何赋能制造企业组织韧性的生成逻辑与作用机理,结果发现,组织韧性形成是一个“韧性激活→韧性调整→韧性表现”不断循环迭代的过程。在组织韧性形成过程中,制造企业经过熵增、熵减和反熵演化,促使组织结构实现从混乱无序到低级有序再到高级有序的自适应优化,进而产生抵抗承受、调整恢复和复原成长3个演化阶段,并呈现出3种组织韧性生成逻辑:①环境冲击响应→资源整合重组→组织利益联结;②情境识别干预→链合创新技术协同→组织效益扩容;③战略层面调整→引领组织思想→组织责任驱动。精益数字化通过标准化筑牢根基、自动化激活响应、均衡化驱动进化三阶赋能机制,重塑组织韧性生成路径。研究结论揭示技术嵌入管理与管理重塑技术的双向互构逻辑,为制造业破解“高熵陷阱”,实现“抗冲击—快恢复—稳增长”韧性闭环提供可复制的行动框架,助力企业从数字化转型迈向韧性智造。

本文引用格式

霍春辉 , 杨艳茹 , 何地 , 荆树伟 . 精益数字化赋能制造企业组织韧性的生成逻辑与作用机理——基于耗散结构理论的多案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2026 , 43(1) : 137 -149 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D42025030051

Abstract

Against the backdrop of intensifying VUCA characteristics in the global economy, manufacturing enterprises are confronted with multiple nonlinear shocks , including geopolitical risks and the reconstruction of industrial supply chains. The traditional model reliant on economies of scale and static resource allocation has fallen into the high-entropy trap due to strategic inertia, exposing the deep-seated contradiction between resource redundancy and insufficient agile response. Lean digitalization reconstructs the underlying logic of the value stream through data flow, integrating the essence of lean management with industrial Internet technology. This approach facilitates dynamic resource allocation, enabling a transition from merely eliminating waste to actively preventing entropy increase, thereby transforming organizational resilience from passive repair to proactive evolution. Although lean digitalization is regarded as the key path to break the predicament of the manufacturing industry, there is still a theoretical decoupling predicament in its interaction mechanism with organizational resilience. At present, both research and practice encounter core bottlenecks such as an absence of collaborative mechanisms between lean concepts and digital technologies, along with an inadequacy in dynamic capability quantitative evaluation systems. Ultimately, this leads to systemic challenges where data empowerment struggles to be effectively translated into gains in resilience. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism by which lean digitalization empowers organizational resilience is not only essential for addressing risks in the VUCA era but also serves as a pivotal proposition for bridging gaps at their theoretical intersection.
In this study, four typical and representative Chinese manufacturing enterprises—FAW Car Co., Ltd., Weichai Power Co., Ltd., Huaxing Textile Group Co., Ltd., and TZME (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.—are selected as samples. The aim is to elucidate the fundamental logic and mechanisms through which lean digitalization influences the development of organizational resilience in manufacturing firms. The research findings indicate that the formation of organizational resilience is a continuous iterative process characterized by three stages: resilience activation, resilience adjustment, and resilience performance. Drawing on the theory of dissipative structures, the study concludes that enterprises engage with negative entropy factors through a sustained influx of positive entropy flow, thereby facilitating the periodic establishment and reconstruction of dynamic equilibrium. Furthermore, under critical threshold triggers, the nonlinear synergy effect becomes exponentially amplified, enabling enterprises to generate driving forces for adaptive evolution within their systems. When external disturbances surpass threshold boundaries, fluctuations among internal elements activate self-organizing mechanisms, ultimately leading to a transformative leap from disorder to order within the enterprises.
The findings reveal three evolutionary stages: (1) In the resistance-absorption stage, short-term economic resilience is built via a dynamic path of environmental impact response (X1) → resource reconfiguration (Y1) → interest alignment (Z1) during crisis response. (2) In the adjustment-recovery stage, mid-term structural resilience emerges through a progressive path of situational recognition (X2) → technological chain integration (Y2) → benefit expansion (Z2) in crisis rebound. (3) In the recovery-growth stage, long-term strategic resilience is achieved via a spiral path of strategic recalibration (X3) → leadership cognition advancement (Y3) → responsibility-driven transformation (Z3) for crisis reversal. Furthermore, the incorporation of lean digitalization offers an innovative shortcut for fostering organizational resilience within enterprises, thereby enhancing both recovery and rebound speed when faced with adverse factors. These mechanisms demonstrate how lean digitalization facilitates structural optimization from disorder to hierarchical order through entropy evolution, enabling the generation of resilience via standardized foundations, self-activated responsiveness, and equilibrium-driven evolution.
From the perspective of dissipative structure theory, this paper employs a multi-case study methodology to delve into the mechanism through which lean digitalization enhances the organizational resilience of manufacturing enterprises. Research findings uncover the bidirectional co-construction logic between technology- imbued management and management-reshaped technology. Moreover, the study offers a replicable operational framework for the manufacturing sector to escape the high-entropy trap and realize a resilient closed loop of shock resistance, rapid recovery, and stable growth. These outcomes not only furnish a theoretical foundation but also supply practical insights for elucidating the intrinsic link between the achievement of intelligent manufacturing upgrades and the bolstering of organizational resilience within Chinese manufacturing enterprises.

参考文献

[1] 宋耘, 王婕, 陈浩泽. 逆全球化情境下企业的组织韧性形成机制——基于华为公司的案例研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(5): 3-19.
[2] 钱悦, 温雅, 孙亚程. 乌卡环境下如何提升组织韧性——基于组织学习的视角[J].南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2): 38-52.
[3] 荆树伟, 冯月, 阎俊爱, 等. 咨询团队参与下情绪对精益数字化推行的影响[J].系统工程学报, 2023, 38(4): 459-473.
[4] 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 等. 数智赋能: 危机情境下组织韧性如何形成——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 84-104.
[5] SAJKO M, BOONE C, BUYL T. CEO greed, corporate social responsibility, and organizational resilience to systemic shocks[J].Journal of Management, 2021, 47(4): 957-992.
[6] 张少峰, 徐梦苏, 朱悦, 等. 技术创新、组织韧性与制造企业高质量发展[J].科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(13): 81-92.
[7] 张强, 戈福利, 张璐, 等. 国内外企业韧性研究述评与展望[J].科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(16): 37-48.
[8] BENKHATI I, BELHADI A, KAMBLE S S, et al. Linkages between smart, lean, and resilient manufacturing for sustainable development[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment,2023,32(6):3689-3704.
[9] TORTORELLA G, PRASHAR A, ANTONY J, et al. Soft lean practices and organizational resilience in the service sector[J].Management Decision, 2024, 62(4): 1424-1452.
[10] 尹西明, 马伊兰, 王朝晖, 等. 制造业数字化转型、开放式创新与组织韧性——基于动态能力视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2025,42(22):43-53.
[11] 张秀娥, 滕欣宇. 组织韧性内涵、维度及测量[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(10): 9-17.
[12] BERGAMI M, CORSINO M, DAOOD A, et al. Being resilient for society: evidence from companies that leveraged their resources and capabilities to fight the COVID-19 crisis[J].R&D Management, 2022, 52(2): 235-254.
[13] RABENU E, TZINER A. Employee resilience: a faceted analytical approach[J].Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2016, 9(2): 480-485.
[14] KANTUR D. Measuring organizational resilience: a scale development[J].Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 2015, 4(3): 456-472.
[15] VAN DER VEGT G S, ESSENS P, WAHLSTRM M, et al. Managing risk and resilience[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(4): 971-980.
[16] TSIAPA M, BATSIOLAS I. Firm resilience in regions of eastern Europe during the period 2007—2011[J].Post-Communist Economies, 2019, 31(1): 19-35.
[17] SCHOLZ R W, CZICHOS R, PARYCEK P, et al. Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: a first validation of an assessment method[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 282(2): 627-643.
[18] SCHUMACHER S, HALL R, BILDSTEIN A, et al. Lean production systems 4.0: systematic literature review and field study on the digital transformation of lean methods and tools[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2023, 61(24): 8751-8773.
[19] ROSSINI M, CIFONE F D, KASSEM B, et al. Being lean: how to shape digital transformation in the manufacturing sector[J].Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2021, 32(9): 239-259.
[20] CIANO M P, DALLASEGA P, ORZES G, et al. One-to-one relationships between Industry 4.0 technologies and lean production techniques: a multiple case study[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(5): 1386-1410.
[21] 杨震宁,侯一凡.协同创新网络资源供给、企业创新需求、供需关系与创新绩效——基于中国科技园数据的实证分析[J].珞珈管理评论,2022,16(6):17-45.
[22] 陈晓东, 杨晓霞. 数字经济发展对产业结构升级的影响——基于灰关联熵与耗散结构理论的研究[J].改革, 2021, 34(3): 26-39.
[23] 史雅文,张捷,毕砚昭.基于耗散结构理论的企业组织韧性构建路径与对策研究[C].第十五届中国管理学年会论文集.南京:中国管理现代化研究会,2020.
[24] 张公一, 张畅, 刘思雯. 环境不确定情境下组织韧性影响路径、作用机制与应对策略研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(2): 20-29.
[25] GIOIA D A, CORLEY K G, HAMILTON A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research[J].Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31.
[26] 韩文海, 苏敬勤. 耗散驱动适应效应: 数字化创新的主导逻辑——基于A网约车平台的纵向案例研究[J].管理评论, 2023, 35(3): 320-336.
[27] 刘春红, 郄可心, 陈李红. 动态视角下组织韧性的形成机理与作用效果[J].经济管理, 2023, 45(8): 5-25.
文章导航

/