Innovation is the first driving force for development. China's continuous improvement of its scientific and technological innovation system has led to the continuous improvement of its innovation-driven development capabilities, with innovative achievements in cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence and quantum technology emerging, and the turnover of technology contracts increasing by nearly 30%. While previous research has thoroughly examined the varied effects of innovation policies on fostering innovation, it has predominantly concentrated on the mechanisms through which individual policies influence innovation performance, particularly within the realm of enterprise innovation. There is a noticeable gap in understanding how comprehensive national innovation policies can bolster regional innovation performance, and a scarcity of studies that delve into the mechanisms linking these policies to regional innovation outcomes. Furthermore, as a form of macroeconomic policy, the influence of national innovation policies on regional innovation systems is multifaceted and intricate. Variations in implementation across different regions, sectors, and stages may lead to divergent impacts on regional innovation systems. However, research on innovation policies and regional innovation that accounts for regional disparities and investigates cross-level impact mechanisms using panel data is sparse. As an important part of the national innovation system, regional innovation plays an important role in promoting economic and social development, enhancing regional competitiveness, and implementing new development concepts. Regional innovation capacity is not only affected by innovation resources within the region, but also regulated by national innovation policies. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the impact of national innovation policy on regional innovation performance and its internal mechanism.
This paper focuses on the diversity and complexity of the impact of national innovation policy on regional innovation systems.As a macro-control policy, these policies may yield varying outcomes across different regions, fields, and stages of implementation. Therefore, in order to investigate the impact of innovation policies at the national level on innovation performance at the regional level, the mediating role of innovation subject cooperation intensity in this process, and the moderating role of regional technology diversification in this process, this paper constructs a cross-level model without confusion based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China. The study adopts regional innovation performance as the dependent variable, with the number of invention patent applications serving as the metric for assessing this performance. It approaches the quantification of innovation policies from the perspective of policy intensity, utilizing national innovation policies as the explanatory variables. The study identifies cooperation intensity as a mediating variable and technological diversification as a moderating variable. Control variables encompass factors such as education level, industrial structure, the scale of high-tech enterprises, road density, and the density of mobile phone switches.The study focuses on the intra-group effect and inter-group effect to empirically test the cross-level impact mechanism of national innovation policy on regional innovation performance.
It is found that (1) national innovation policy has a significant impact on regional innovation performance; (2) cooperation intensity plays a mediating role between national innovation policies and regional innovation performance; (3) cooperation intensity contributes to the improvement of regional innovation performance, and technological diversification plays a moderating role in it.
In order to further improve regional innovation performance and strengthen the impact of innovation policies on regional innovation performance, this paper puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions from the aspects of improving the pertinence of innovation policies, strengthening cooperation intensity among innovation entities, and promoting the diversified development of regional technologies.
This paper clarifies the influencing mechanisms of national innovation policies, regional innovation performance, cooperation intensity of innovation subjects, and technology diversification, expands the previous research on the impact of innovation policies on regional innovation, and enriches the impact model of regional innovation performance. Furthermore, it provides recommendations for optimizing innovation policies and enhancing regional innovation performance in light of empirical analysis results. These contributions provide beneficial supplements to existing research and contribute to the realization of high-quality economic development in China.
[1] GAO K, YUAN Y. Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance:empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China[J].Technology in Society,2022,70:102035.
[2] LI L, LI M, MA S, et al. Does the construction of innovative cities promote urban green innovation[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,318:115605.
[3] 杨晓军,薛洪畅.创新驱动政策是否促进城市减污降碳协同增效——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2024,23(3):1-14.
[4] LAI M, FANG J, XIE R. Does regional innovation policy encourage firm indigenous innovation? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of the pilot project of innovative cities in China[J].Applied Economics,2024,56(15):1817-1833.
[5] 崔惠玉,王宝珠,徐颖.绿色金融创新、金融资源配置与企业污染减排[J].中国工业经济,2023,40(10):118-136.
[6] 钱丽,汪美鑫,肖仁桥.低碳试点政策对城市碳中和技术创新的影响及溢出效应[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(21):108-119.
[7] 张嘉望,李博阳,彭晖.国家高新区“以集群促发展”政策是否提升了城市创新水平——兼论创新集群“中心—外围”结构的技术互补效应[J].经济学家,2023,35(11):79-88.
[8] 谢谦,毕文静,金才淇.税收激励与企业创新——基于固定资产加速折旧政策的检验[J].南开管理评论,2025,28(6):174-185.
[9] 张峻,刘小勇,王昕芊.国家知识产权试点政策是否促进了城市创新合作[J].经济学动态,2023, 64(5):72-91.
[10] 苏屹,姜诗源,刘传斌.政府数字化激励,企业数字化水平与企业创新[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(2):105-112.
[11] 时省,张亚.绿色金融政策对绿色技术创新的影响及机制研究——基于绿色金融改革创新试验区的准自然实验[J].管理评论,2024,36(1):107-118.
[12] 王海,闫卓毓,郭冠宇,等.数字基础设施政策与企业数字化转型:“赋能”还是“负能”[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(5):5-23.
[13] 刘惠好,陈梦洁,焦文妞.“去杠杆”政策之于国有企业创新:抑制还是促进[J].经济管理,2023,45(11):68-88.
[14] 盛小平,吴瑾.我国大数据政策对区域创新能力影响的实证研究[J].现代情报,2024,44(12):89-101.
[15] ZHAO L,HUI K N C, XIONG F,et al.When and why do innovation policies change?a performance feedback perspective[J].SAGE Open,2023,13(1):21582440231162502.
[16] 梁睿昕,李姚矿.政府创新政策对数字企业技术创新激励效应研究[J].统计研究,2023,40(11):40-52.
[17] 程文银,潘霞,陈劲,等.国有企业改制如何助力企业原始创新——兼议制度与政策的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(9):71-90.
[18] 徐咏仪,冯海波.多维财税优惠政策激励创新会产生合成谬误吗[J].财贸经济,2023,44(12):29-47.
[19] 赵晶,迟旭,孙泽君.“协调统一”还是“各自为政”:政策协同对企业自主创新的影响[J].中国工业经济,2022,39(8):175-192.
[20] 李坚飞,水会莉,宋闻.营商环境、政策支持与企业创新激励——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(5):39-51.
[21] 李林威,刘帮成.区域协同发展政策能否提升城市创新水平——基于粤港澳大湾区的准自然实验[J].经济问题探索,2022,43(10):77-93.
[22] 曹贤忠,陈波,郭艺,等.长三角G60科创走廊对沿线城市跨界创新合作的影响研究[J].软科学,2024,38(5):58-64.
[23] 温兴琦,孙凯新,李诗瑶.产学研合作、知识吸收能力与企业创新绩效——高管学术背景与政府创新补贴的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(15):55-64.
[24] 苏屹,李忠婷.区域创新系统主体合作强度对创新绩效的影响研究[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(3):64-76
[25] 刘晓燕,孙丽娜,单晓红,等.嵌入性视角下创新网络社团创新绩效提升路径研究——以我国集成电路产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(8):116-127.
[26] 胡双钰,吴和成,翁旻.区域合作对创新绩效的影响研究[J].经济经纬,2022,39(3):26-34.
[27] 方杰,温忠麟.有调节的多层中介效应分析[J].心理科学,2023,46(1):221-229.
[28] 俞立平,张宏如.区域创新升级:如何从创新数量走向创新质量——基于统计学视角的模式识别及跃迁机制研究[J].中国软科学,2023,37(2):35-45.
[29] 蔡双立,张晓丹.开放创新下知识产权保护与区域创新能力提升:堵还是疏[J].科研管理,2023,44(5):149-158.
[30] 彭纪生,仲为国,孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J].管理世界,2008,24(9):25-36.
[31] 梁丽娜,于渤.技术流动、创新网络对区域创新能力的影响研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(10):48-55.
[32] 潘鑫,王元地,金珺.技术多元化与区域创新能力关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(16):38-42.
[33] PREACHER K J, RUCKER D D, HAYES A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions[J].Multivariate Behavioral Research,2007,42(1):185-227.
[34] 王晓红,李娜,张奔.企业研发投入、产学研协同发展与区域创新产出——对外开放度的调节作用[J].系统管理学报,2022,31(3):500-508,521.
[35] 方杰,温忠麟.纵向数据的调节效应分析[J].心理科学进展,2022,30(11):2461-2475.