新能源汽车产业快速发展为企业提供了新市场机遇,构建标准合作网络成为提升企业技术创新能力的重要途径。围绕“如何把握新能源汽车产业标准合作网络结构特征与演化规律”这一关键问题,以2006—2023年我国新能源汽车产业国家标准数据为研究对象,采用社会网络分析法构建标准合作网络,从静态和动态两个方面深入分析中心性、结构洞、小世界性等特征及全生命周期演化规律。研究发现:①在我国新能源汽车产业标准合作网络中,大型企业和少量高校、科研院所占据网络核心位置;②标准合作网络中的最强连接子网具有明显的小世界特征;③网络演化经历了起步期、成长期、跨越期和蓬勃期4个阶段,网络规模扩张迅速,网络连通性越来越强。研究结论揭示我国新能源汽车产业标准合作网络结构特征与演化规律,为推动产业技术标准化进程提供支撑。
Under the national strategy of "accelerating the implementation of an innovation-driven development strategy," the new energy vehicle (NEV) industry has gradually become a crucial pillar for industrial transformation, upgrading, and green, low-carbon development. The rapid development of the NEV industry not only relies on technological advancements but also requires strong synergy in standardization. As a critical factor in technological innovation and industrial development, technical standards play an important role in promoting resource integration and technology sharing throughout the industry chain. However, there are still some deficiencies in China′s core technical standards for NEVs, especially in terms of the gap with advanced international standards, highlighting shortcomings in standard-setting, technological R&D, and industry-academia-research collaboration. To this end, there is an urgent need to bolster collaborative innovation in technical standards and to establish a robust industrial standards cooperation network. Furthermore, the contributions and leadership roles of core enterprises and research institutions in standardization have increasingly become key factors affecting the competitive landscape of the industry. Their progress in standardization not only impacts the healthy development of the industry but also provides feedback and insights for collaborative innovation.
To better understand the characteristics and evolution of the standard cooperation network within China's NEV industry, this paper examines national standards in China′s NEV industry as the research subject; by employing social network analysis, the study constructs a standard cooperation network and conducts an in-depth analysis of the network′s structural features and key nodes. The research focuses on identifying the core actors within the standard cooperation network, analyzing the overall structural cohesion of the network, and assessing the collaborative relationships among actors. By measuring indicators such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, the study reveals the roles and influence of different actors in the standard cooperation network, particularly highlighting the leading roles of large enterprises and research institutions in standardization cooperation. Additionally, it applies life cycle theory to divide the evolutionary process of the standard cooperation network into different stages, analyzing structural changes at each stage to uncover the evolutionary patterns of standardization cooperation in the NEV industry.
The analysis results indicate that China′s NEV industry-standard cooperation network exhibits a significant small-world characteristic, wherein high clustering and short characteristic path lengths exist among the actors in the network. This structural feature helps accelerate information flow and knowledge sharing, promoting collaborative innovation among the actors. Through structural hole analysis, the study concludes that certain core enterprises, such as BYD, CATL, and Huawei, occupy key positions in the network, and they act as information bridges between different actors and effectively facilitating the integration of heterogeneous resources. These companies not only accumulate rich knowledge and experience in NEV technology but also enhance their control and information access capabilities within the standard cooperation network by occupying structural hole positions, thereby supporting innovative development in the industry. Furthermore, using a logistic model, this study conducts a phase-by-phase analysis of the standard cooperation network's evolution and divides the network′s development into four stages: initial, growth, breakthrough, and flourishing phases. The network scale and structural characteristics exhibit distinct changes at different development stages.
In summary, this paper provides a new perspective and theoretical basis for understanding the standardization process of the NEV industry by analyzing the characteristics and evolution of China's NEV industry-standard cooperation network. The findings indicate that core enterprises in the standard cooperation network play a vital role in driving industrial innovation and standardization, while the network's small-world structure and structural hole effects enhance information dissemination efficiency and resource integration capabilities. This study not only offers significant guidance for standardization practices in China′s NEV industry but also provides practical insights for policymakers and the industry in constructing and optimizing standard cooperation networks. By strengthening industry-academia-research collaboration, promoting standardization alliance building, and enhancing fundamental and generic technology research, China can further improve standard innovation and sustainable development in the NEV industry.
[1] 方世世,周立军,杨静,等.国家标准合作网络结构特征及驱动模式——以数字经济领域为例[J].中国科技论坛,2020,36(5):82-90,117.
[2] 剧晓红.技术标准对企业关键技术自主化的影响机制研究——来自民营企业的微观证据[J].信息资源管理学报,2024,14(1):118-130.
[3] RIBEIRO B,SHAPIRA P. Private and public values of innovation: a patent analysis of synthetic biology[J]. Research Policy,2020,49 (1):103875.
[4] EHRHARDT M.Network effects, standardisation and competitive strategy: how companies influence the emergence of dominant designs[J]. International Journal of Technology Management,2004,27(2/3):272-294.〖HJ*3/8〗
[5] BARNES J A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish[J]. Human Relations, 1954, 7(1): 39-58.
[6] 刘军.整体网络分析——UCINET软件实用指南(第二版)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2014.
[7] 王兆峰,廖红璐.参照群体视角下社交圈对潜在旅游者旅游意愿的影响机制研究[J].旅游科学,2018,32(6):33-46.
[8] RAPOPORT A, HORVATH W J. A study of a large sociogram[J]. Behavioral Science, 1961, 6(4):279-291.
[9] JANG S, LEE J H. Analysis of patent cooperation network by industry of artificial intelligence technology[J]. Management & Information Systems Review,2023,42(1):95-113.
[10] 刘人境,钟兴举,孟拓宁,等.大科学装置科研合作网络结构特征研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2023,43(6):140-151.
[11] 曾莉,李霞.成渝双城经济圈高校产学研专利合作网络的时空演化分布与特征[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(16):132-145.
[12] LI H, WANG Z, LIN W. How Sino-foreign cooperation networks affect innovation performance of Chinese enterprises? evidence from biomedical industry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2023,71: 8809-8825.
[13] 韦海英.高技术企业技术标准合作网络中的主体互动研究[D]. 长沙:湖南大学,2005.
[14] JINYAN W, WILLIAM J QUALLS, DEMING ZENG. Standardization alliance networks, standard-setting influence, and new product outcomes[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2020,37(2):138-157.
[15] 刘子菡.标准合作网络结构对创新绩效的影响研究[D]. 武汉:中南财经政法大学,2021.
[16] 方世世.标准合作网络特征视角下技术创新对企业绩效的影响研究[D]. 杭州:中国计量大学,2021.
[17] WU Y, DE VRIES H J. Effects of participation in standardization on firm performance from a network perspective: evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022,175:121376.
[18] WEI Y, WANG C, QI Y, et al. Dynamic evaluation of the influence of drafting units in China′s air quality standards network[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,252: 119834.
[19] 熊文,王岳华,孙翊.企业技术创新合作网络的结构及其演化——中国制造业国家标准研制的视角[J].标准科学,2023,50(1):6-17.
[20] 张经天,公静.促进新能源汽车产业发展的财税政策建议[J].中国财政,2010,55(13):49-50.
[21] 李晓华.我国新能源汽车的发展现状与前景趋势[J].人民论坛,2024,33(9):76-79.
[22] 索琪,李长升,王力媛.中国新能源汽车产业协同创新网络时空演化特征分析[J].世界地理研究,2024,33(2):79-92.
[23] PARK Y, PARK S, LEE M. Digital health care industry ecosystem: network analysis[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research,2022,24(8):37622.
[24] FREEMAN L C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1978,1(3):215-239.
[25] 汉尼曼,里德尔.社会网络分析方法:Ucinet 的应用[M]. 陈世荣, 钟栎娜,译. 北京:知识产权出版社,2019.
[26] 朱浩,杨诗,罗文竹.跨区域“揭榜挂帅”的主体特征与网络结构研究[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(5):82-93.
[27] BURT R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition [M].Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1992.
[28] WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks [J].Nature, 1998,393:440-442.
[29] 刘国巍,曹霞.产学研BA-CAS合作机制下创新网络动态演化研究——基于系统生存论的关系嵌入视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018,39(4):32-37.
[30] 耿晓琴,雷传方,徐虹.基于SNA的晋陕豫黄河板块旅游经济网络结构特征研究[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(5):18-25.
[31] CHOI K, CHOI J, LEE PA, et al. Alteration of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato plant by microbiota transplant [J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,11:1186.