上下游企业协同合作对于企业培育技术标准化能力,实现产业链上下游标准有效衔接具有重要意义。基于社会网络理论与资源基础理论,以2013—2022年中国汽车行业上市企业为研究对象,从技术、市场两个层面探讨供应链网络位置对企业技术标准化能力的影响,以及企业数字化应用水平的调节作用,进一步分析供应链网络位置对不同类型技术标准化能力、技术创新能力的影响差异。结果发现,处于供应链网络优势位置的企业,其技术标准化能力较强;处于网络中心位置的企业,其技术标准化能力更强。机制检验表明,技术创新能力、市场势力在供应链网络位置与企业技术标准化能力间发挥中介作用;企业数字化应用水平正向调节程度中心度与技术创新能力、市场势力的正向关系。进一步分析发现,相较于结构洞,程度中心度对不同类型企业技术标准化能力、技术创新能力的正向影响更显著;相较于协同创新能力,独立创新能力对企业技术标准化能力的正向影响更显著。结论可为企业利用供应链网络位置提升自身技术标准化能力提供理论指导。
High-tech enterprises' involvement in shaping technical standards is pivotal for their innovation endeavors and securing a competitive edge in both domestic and global markets. The contemporary corporate rivalry transcends the realm of products and services, encompassing the entire supply chain. Suppliers and customers, as key external stakeholders, significantly influence a company's operational decisions and serve as vital sources of external knowledge. The existing studies have extensively discussed technical standardization capabilities of enterprises from the perspective of external networks, but they have reached unanimous conclusions. As an important part of the external network of enterprises, the supply chain network has been neglected by existing research. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring the influence of the supply chain network on the technical standardization capabilities of enterprises, including how their network positions may affect these capabilities. Furthermore, digital technology, as a key driver of technological innovation, has profoundly altered the operational dynamics of corporate external networks. It has introduced new challenges to established theories like network embedding and structural hole theory. Given the rapid evolution of digital technology, the impact of digital technologies on the external networks of enterprises has not been fully discussed. Therefore, this paper further explores the moderating role that the level of digital application may play in the relationship between the supply chain network and the technical standardization capabilities of enterprises.
Drawing on the social network theory and the resource dependence theory, this paper takes the listed companies in China's A-share automobile industry from 2013 to 2022 as the research object, constructs a supply chain network based on the top five suppliers and customer data disclosed by the enterprises, examining the influence of supply chain network positioning on technology standardization capability at both the technological and market levels and the moderating effect of enterprise digital application level, and further discusses the impact of supply chain network location on different types of technology standardization capabilities and technological innovation capabilities.
The study finds that enterprises in the advantageous position within the supply chain network have strong technical standardization capabilities. Enterprises located at the center of the supply chain network exhibit stronger technical standardization capabilities than those at the periphery. Mechanism testing reveals that technological innovation capabilities and market dominance act as mediators between supply chain network positioning and enterprises' technical standardization capabilities. The level of enterprise digital application positively moderates the relationship between centrality and both technological innovation ability and market power. However, the adjustment of structural holes is not significant. Further analysis shows that the degree centrality has a stronger positive impact on the technical standardization ability and technological innovation ability of different types of enterprises compared to the structural hole. The positive impact of independent innovation capabilities on enterprise technology standardization capabilities is stronger than that of collaborative innovation capabilities.
The possible contributions of this paper are as follows: Firstly, it discusses the impact of supply chain network location on enterprise technology standardization capabilities for the first time, and analyzes the difference in the influence of centrality and structure hole on enterprise technology standardization capabilities, which expands the research scope of supply chain network and enterprise technology standardization capabilities, and provides reference for enterprises to improve enterprise technology standardization capability by building advantageous supply chain network location. Secondly, from the dual channels of technology and market, this paper reveals the influence mechanism of supply chain network location on the technology standardization capability of enterprises, and analyzes the impact of enterprise digital application level. This helps enterprises choose appropriate technology standardization strategies based on different network environments and their own digital level, and maximize the advantages of enterprise network location. Finally, this paper analyzes the differences between the influence of independent innovation capability and collaborative innovation capability on the technology standardization capability of enterprises, and reveals the influencing factors of technology standardization capabilities more comprehensively.
[1] CHOI T Y, DOOLEY K J, RUNGTUSANATHAM M. Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence[J].Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19(3): 351-366.
[2] LEIPONEN A E. Competing through cooperation: the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications[J].Management Science, 2008, 54(11): 1904-1919.
[3] 李薇, 邱有梅. 基于纵向合作的技术标准研发决策分析[J].软科学, 2013, 27(6): 48-52.
[4] SOH P H. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(4): 438-461.
[5] 曾德明, 邹思明, 张运生. 网络位置、技术多元化与企业在技术标准制定中的影响力研究[J].管理学报, 2015, 12(2): 198-206.
[6] 杨蕙馨, 王硕, 冯文娜. 网络效应视角下技术标准的竞争性扩散——来自iOS与Android之争的实证研究[J].中国工业经济, 2014,32(9): 135-147.
[7] 李薇, 邱有梅. 纵向伙伴关系维度的技术标准扩散效应研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(17): 20-26.
[8] 王少华, 王敢娟, 董敏凯. 供应链网络位置、数字化转型与企业全要素生产率[J].上海财经大学学报, 2024, 26(3): 3-17.
[9] 李小丽, 任哲文. 合作网络嵌入性、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究——数字化转型的作用[J].当代经济, 2024, 41(4): 78-92.
[10] BELLAMY M A, GHOSH S, HORA M. The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation[J].Journal of Operations Management, 2014, 32(6): 357-373.
[11] 黄宏斌, 张玥杨, 孙雅妮. 供应网络位置能促进企业间协同创新吗[J].证券市场导报, 2023, 33(6): 3-14.
[12] CHU Y, TIAN X, WANG W. Corporate innovation along the supply chain[J].Management Science, 2019, 65(6): 2445-2466.
[13] 李冬梅, 刘昀哲, 李金梦, 等. 网络嵌入性视角下技术标准制定话语权争夺:一个并行中介模型[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(13): 20-28.
[14] 李薇, 张欣. 基于伙伴关系建构的联盟标准扩散效应[J].运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 183-191.
[15] 文金艳, 曾德明, 徐露允, 等. 结构洞、网络多样性与企业技术标准化能力[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 195-203.
[16] GEERTEN KAA. Who's pulling the strings? the influence of network structure on standard dominance[J].R&D Management, 2018, 48(4): 438-446.
[17] 黄灿, 蒋青嬗. 股东关系网络与企业创新[J].南开经济研究, 2021, 37(2): 67-87.
[18] HOFFMANN W H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(8): 827-856.
[19] 宋华, 卢强. 什么样的中小企业能够从供应链金融中获益——基于网络和能力的视角[J].管理世界, 2017, 33(6): 104-121.
[20] 李桂华, 赵珊, 王亚. 供应网络位置、吸收能力与企业创新绩效[J].软科学, 2020, 34(12): 1-7.
[21] BLIND K, LORENZ A, RAUBER J. Drivers for companies' entry into standard-setting organizations[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(1): 33-44.
[22] 姜红, 吴玉浩, 高思芃. 基于专利分析的技术标准化能力演化过程研究[J].情报杂志, 2018, 37(7): 66-73.
[23] 陈理, 周忠宝, 黄珺. 供应网络位置、管理层能力与企业技术创新——基于融资和风险视角[J].系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(11): 3078-3092.
[24] BLIND K, MANGELSDORF A. Motives to standardize: empirical evidence from Germany[J].Technovation, 2016,48: 13-24.
[25] 李庆满, 杨皎平, 赵宏霞. 集群内外竞争、标准网络外部性对标准联盟组建意愿和创新绩效的影响[J].管理科学, 2018, 31(2): 45-58.
[26] 史金艳, 杨健亨, 李延喜, 等. 牵一发而动全身:供应网络位置、经营风险与公司绩效[J].中国工业经济, 2019, 37(9): 136-154.
[27] 胡媛媛, 陈守明, 仇方君. 企业数字化战略导向、市场竞争力与组织韧性[J].中国软科学, 2021, 36(S1): 214-225.
[28] 王海花, 李烨, 王莹, 等. 标准联盟网络位置与数字创新:一个有调节的中介模型[J].系统管理学报, 2023, 40(5): 538-548.
[29] 程大中, 汪宁. 贸易网络与企业创新——理论和来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5): 158-179.
[30] 于明洋, 吕可夫, 阮永平. 供应链网络位置与企业竞争地位[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(7): 1796-1810.