产业技术进步

数字化转型对制造业发展韧性的影响——基于动态门槛效应的实证研究

  • 杜家廷 ,
  • 何金凤 ,
  • 顾谦农
展开
  • (1.重庆师范大学 经济与管理学院,重庆 401331 ; 2. 鲍尔州立大学 米勒商学院, 美国 印第安纳州 47306)
杜家廷(1973—),男,重庆人,博士,重庆师范大学经济与管理学院教授,研究方向为金融经济学;何金凤(1998—),女,贵州铜仁人,重庆师范大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为产业经济学;顾谦农(1971—),男,江苏南通人,博士,鲍尔州立大学米勒商学院副教授,研究方向为供应链管理。

收稿日期: 2023-09-18

  修回日期: 2024-01-18

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-25

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(22XJL002,19BJY038)

The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Development Resilience of Manufacturing Industry:An Empirical Study Based on Dynamic Threshold Effect

  • Du Jiating ,
  • He Jinfeng ,
  • Gu Qiannong
Expand
  • (1. College of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China; 2. Miller College of Business, Ball State University,Indiana 47306,the U.S. )

Received date: 2023-09-18

  Revised date: 2024-01-18

  Online published: 2025-05-25

摘要

增强发展韧性是我国制造业抵御外部不确定性冲击、实现制造大国向制造强国跨越的必然要求。基于2010—2022年我国内地30个省份面板数据,综合运用动态门槛效应模型、有调节的中介效应模型和差分GMM模型,研究数字化转型对制造业发展韧性的影响。结果发现:考察期内我国制造业发展韧性存在差距,但整体上呈现缩小趋势;数字化转型对制造业发展韧性具有显著提升作用且存在动态门槛效应;数字化转型对制造业发展韧性的影响存在企业、行业和区域异质性。从作用机制来看,技术创新具有中介效应,融资约束和外源融资发挥有调节的中介效应。进一步分析,制造业数字化转型存在显著的行业与地区同群效应。

本文引用格式

杜家廷 , 何金凤 , 顾谦农 . 数字化转型对制造业发展韧性的影响——基于动态门槛效应的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(10) : 61 -72 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023090528

Abstract

Since the implementation of the "Made in China 2025" strategy in 2015, the size of China's manufacturing industry has grown substantially, and its overall capacities have greatly improved. China has held the title of the world's largest manufacturing nation for 13 straight years. Meanwhile, the world is undergoing the most significant changes, characterized by a cooling global economy, the emergence of new trade protectionism and deglobalization trends, increasing geopolitical conflicts, and other global economic uncertainties. China's manufacturing industry is facing a progressively complex external environment. Enhancing its manufacturing resilience is an inevitable requirement for China's manufacturing industry to resist external uncertainties, promote high-quality development of the manufacturing industry, and smoothly realize the transition from a "big manufacturing country" to a "powerful manufacturing country". Digital transformation is the process by which enterprises utilize digital technologies to enhance efficiency, improve business processes, and innovate value creation methods. It can enhance manufacturing resilience through various means, such as promoting production process reengineering, enhancing collaborative innovation capabilities, and improving resource allocation efficiency and total factor productivity. Therefore, there are significant theoretical and practical implications for exploring how digital transformation can boost the resilience of manufacturing.
There is limited research on manufacturing resilience through the lens of digital transformation.Using panel data samples from 30 provinces from 2010 to 2022, this study adopts the dynamic threshold effect model, the moderated mediation effect model and the differential GMM model to analyze the impact of digital transformation on the development resilience of the manufacturing industry. It is found that (1) from a perspective of evolution, the resilience of China's manufacturing industry has slightly declined. Although the difference in manufacturing resilience varies among provinces, it shows an overall shrinking trend. (2) The regression results of the benchmark model demonstrate that digital transformation has a significant enhancing effect on manufacturing resilience. Furthermore, this effect is not linear. There exists a dynamic threshold effect, and when the level of digital transformation meets or exceeds the threshold, its impact on manufacturing resilience will exhibit a marginal decline. (3) The results of heterogeneity test indicate that the impact of digital transformation on manufacturing resilience varies among enterprises, industries, and regions. Compared to private enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises, digital transformation has a more significant impact on enhancing the manufacturing resilience of state-owned or large enterprises; in low threshold areas, except for textiles, there is a significant enhancing effect on the manufacturing resilience of various subsectors of the manufacturing industry, while there are differences in effects within high value areas; compared to eastern and central China and low human capital areas, digital transformation has a more significant impact on enhancing manufacturing resilience in the western region and high human capital areas in China. (4) During the process of enhancing manufacturing resilience, digital transformation has a moderated mediating effect.Technological innovation is the mediating variable, and financing constraints and external financing are the moderating variables. Simultaneously, this digital transformation has significant industry and regional homogeneity effects. Hence, China should pay more attention to enhancing manufacturing resilience, and continuously strengthening the foundation of digital transformation by vigorously promoting a "new infrastructure". To enhance targeted digital transformation and manufacturing resilience from a heterogeneous perspective and consider technological innovation and financing convenience, it is necessary to fully leverage the peer effects of digital transformation and accelerate the process of digital transformation in the manufacturing industry through a digital transformation resource sharing platform.
The marginal contribution of this article lies in three aspects. The study first adopts a single indicator method to measure manufacturing resilience, which avoids the causal inversion problem that may occur when using a multi-factor indicator system to measure manufacturing resilience. Then it analyzes the nonlinear relationship between digital transformation and manufacturing resilience based on a dynamic threshold effect model, which enriches the theoretical connotation of the relationship between digital transformation and manufacturing resilience. Lastly, it advances the understanding of the relationship between digital transformation and manufacturing resilience by clarifying the internal mechanism of the relationship between digital transformation and manufacturing resilience, and the peer effects of digital transformation on manufacturing in different industries and regions.

参考文献

[1] COMFORT L K. Risk and resilience:inter-organizational learning following the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,1994,2(3):157-170.
[2] BRISTOW G,HEALY A.Innovation and regional economic resilience:an exploratory analysis [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2018, 60 (2): 265-284.
[3] 刘瑞,张伟静.空间集聚能否提升中国制造业韧性—基于产业适应性结构调整的视角[J].当代财经,2021,44 (11):16-27.
[4] 张伟,李航宇,张婷.中国制造业产业链韧性测度及其时空分异特征[J].经济地理,2023,43(4):134-143.
[5] FISCHER M, IMGRUNG F, JANIESCH, et al. Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: defining meta objectives using business process management[J]. Information & Management,2020,57(5):103262.
[6] BROCK K, OUDEN E D & LANGERAK F,et al. Front end transfers of digital innovations in a hybrid Agile-Stage-Gate setting[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2022,6(37):506-527.
[7] GREGORY VIAL. Understanding digital transformation:a review and a research agenda[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2):118-144.
[8] 王京滨,刘赵宁,刘新民.数字化转型与企业全要素生产率——基于资源配置效率的机制检验[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(3):23-33.
[9] BANALIEVA E R,DHANARAJ C .Internalization theory for the digital economy [J].Journal of International Business Studies,2019,8(50):1372-1381.
[10] WARNER K S R, WGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation:an on going process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning,2019,52(3):326-349.
[11] NAMBISANS, WRIGHT M, FELDMAN M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy,2019,48(8):1-9.
[12] HESS, THOMAS, MATT, et al. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy[J]. MIS Quarterly Executive,2016,15(2):123-139.
[13] CORTADA J W. The digital hand:how computers changed the work of american manufacturing,transportation,and retail industries [J].Business History Review,2004,78(3):494-569.
[14] BRYNJOLFSSON E, ROCK D, SYVERSON C. Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox:a clash of expectations and statistics[J]. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence,2017, 56(11):23-57.
[15] 贺正楚,潘为华,潘红玉,等.制造企业数字化转型与创新效率:制造过程与商业模式的异质性分析[J].中国软科学,2023,42(3):162-177.
[16] 郭春娜,晏发发,陈宇游.现代化经济体系下制造业资本配置效率的分解及差异性研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2021,38(9):62-79.
[17] 陈堂,陈光.数字化转型对产业结构升级的空间效应研究——基于静态和动态空间面板模型的实证分析[J]. 经济与管理研究,2021,42(8):30-51.
[18] 张矿伟,俞立平,张宏如,等. 数字化转型对高技术产业创新的影响机制与效应研究[J].统计研究, 2023,40(10):96-108.
[19] ACEMOGLU D, RESTREPO P. Robots and jobs:evidence from US labor markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2020, 128(6):2188-2244.
[20] 余菲菲,王丽婷.数字技术赋能我国制造企业技术创新路径研究[J].科研管理,2022,43(4):11-19.
[21] 黄大禹,谢获宝,邹梦婷.金融化抑制了企业数字化转型吗——证据与机制解释[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2022,42(7):57-73.
[22] ADHIKARI B, AGRAWAL A. Peer influence on payout policies[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2018,48(2):615-637.
[23] 王旭,褚旭.制造业企业绿色技术创新的同群效应研究——基于多层次情境的参照作用[J].南开管理评论,2022,25(2):68-81.
[24] MASON C, KIRKBRIDE J, BRYDE D. From stakeholders to institutions: the changing face of social enterprise governance theory[J]. Management Decision,2007,45(2):284-301.
[25] DORAN J, FINGLETON B. US metropolitan area resilience:insights from dynamic spatial panel estimation [J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2018, 50 (1):111-132.
[26] KREMER S, BICK A, NAUTZ D. Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis[J]. Empirical Economics,2013,44(2) :861-878.
[27] 吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021,37(7):130-144.
[28] 韦倩,王安,王杰.中国沿海地区的崛起:市场的力量[J].经济研究,2014,49(8):170-183.
[29] 刘新争.企业数字化转型中的“生产率悖论”——来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].经济学家,2023,35(11):37-47.
[30] 戴翔,马皓巍,张二震. 数字化转型一定能提升企业加成率吗[J].金融研究,2023,32(5):134-151.
[31] 杨松令,张秋月,刘梦伟,等.控股股东股权质押“同群效应”与股价崩盘风险[J].经济管理,2020,42(12):94-112.
文章导航

/