In the face of the pressing need for high-quality growth domestically and the increasingly unstable and complex global environment, China must take the lead in innovation and accelerate the creation of new high-quality productive forces. As an effective model for fostering innovation and development, industry-university-research (IUR) cooperation has gained widespread recognition and prominence in driving innovation-driven development. However, in practice, IUR cooperation still confronts numerous challenges. Among these, uncertainty and opportunistic behaviors generate significant risks, while inequitable benefit distribution, ambiguous intellectual property rights, and poor coordination remain the core obstacles to the effectiveness of cooperation. Clearly, there are risks and opportunities in IUR cooperation, and the openness paradox causes a significant divide in the docking process between Chinese firms and academic institutions. As a result, figuring out how to encourage the deep integration of IUR and investigate the novel avenue of collaborative innovation development has become essential.
IUR cooperation is introducing previously unexplored development potential, driven by the digital era. Blockchain is widely acknowledged as a significant disruptive force in contemporary industry, with its characteristics of decentralization, security, and transparency continually expanding its application areas. With the help of data trust (digital signatures, timestamps), result trust (smart contracts, formula algorithms), and historical trust (chain structure, timestamps), blockchain can quickly and cheaply establish trust while giving multiple subjects a strong foundation for collaborative innovation. Then, can enterprise blockchain applications enhance their IUR cooperation from the standpoint of the open paradox? If it can, what mechanisms does it specifically affect? The majority of existing literature remains at the theoretical level of analysis, lacking empirical validation.Against this backdrop, the study selects the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from the manufacturing sector in China as a research sample for 2016 to 2022, and examines the effect of enterprise blockchain applications on their IUR cooperation and its mechanism from the open paradox standpoint.
The findings suggest that enterprise blockchain applications can promote their IUR cooperation, which still holds after various robustness treatments, and the promotion effect is particularly substantial in large, state-owned enterprises and declining enterprises. According to the mechanism test, enterprise blockchain applications mainly promote their IUR cooperation through the trust enhancement effect. Further analysis reveals that enterprise blockchain applications can not only build the trust mechanism in the stranger relationship network, but also realize the "double reinforcement" of emotional trust and digital trust in the acquaintance relationship network, thus strongly promoting IUR cooperation. In addition, absorptive capacity enhances the relationship between enterprise blockchain applications and their IUR cooperation, and this moderating effect is partially realized through the trust enhancement effect. Specifically, absorptive capacity not only directly moderates the relationship between enterprise blockchain applications and their IUR cooperation, but also indirectly moderates the total effect by moderating the pre- and post-radius of the mediating effect.
This paper presents several innovations. First, it empirically investigates how enterprise blockchain applications affect their IUR cooperation from an open paradox perspective. This not only expands the scope of research on open paradox, but also provides new insights into the deep integration of technology and economy in the context of the digital era. Second, it examines the mediating function of trust between enterprise blockchain applications and their IUR cooperation from the perspective of informal institutions, carefully differentiating between the various forms of acquaintance trust and stranger trust. This not only supports the claim in the literature that blockchain can create trust mechanisms, but also further reveals the "trust-constructing" and "trust-reinforcing" effects of blockchain in the relationship networks of strangers and acquaintances, respectively. Third, drawing on the dynamic capacities theory, it further investigates the mediated moderating effect of absorptive ability between enterprise blockchain applications and their IUR cooperation. The significance of trust mechanisms is further reinforced by this investigation, which also emphasizes the critical role that absorptive capacity plays in promoting IUR cooperation.
[1] OBRADOVIC T, VLACIC B, DABIC M. Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: a review and research agenda[J]. Technovation, 2021, 102: 102221.
[2] 龙小宁, 刘灵子, 张靖. 企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响——基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023,41(10): 174-192.
[3] 吴颖, 肖源, 苏洪, 等. 基于参照点的产学研知识产权冲突协调契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 168-177.
[4] CHIN T, SHI Y, SINGH S K, et al. Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: a dynamic capability of values appropriation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 183: 121908.
[5] WEN B, WANG Y, DING Y, et al. Security and privacy protection technologies in securing blockchain applications[J]. Information Sciences, 2023, 645: 119322.
[6] WAN Y, GAO Y, HU Y. Blockchain application and collaborative innovation in the manufacturing industry: based on the perspective of social trust[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 177: 121540.
[7] UL HASSAN M, REHMANI M H, CHEN J. Anomaly detection in blockchain networks: a comprehensive survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2023, 25(1): 289-318.
[8] CENTOBELLI P, CERCHIONE R, VECCHIO P D, et al. Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain[J]. Information & Management, 2022, 59(7): 103508.
[9] QU Z, MENG Y, LIU B, et al. QB-IMD: a secure medical data processing system with privacy protection based on quantum blockchain for IoMT[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(1): 40-49.
[10] 刘斐然, 胡立君, 范小群. 产学研合作如何影响企业的市场绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(1): 155-163.
[11] 杨小婉, 朱桂龙, 吕凤雯, 等. 产学研合作如何提升高校科研团队学者的学术绩效——基于行为视角的多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(2): 338-352.
[12] TOGOONTUMUR T, COORAY N S. Does collaboration matter: the effect of university-industry R&D collaboration on economic growth[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024, 15(2): 9482-9496.
[13] 肖振红, 李炎. 绿色技术创新模式、环境规制与产学研协同绿色创新[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(4): 16-29.
[14] 李明星, 苏佳璐, 胡成, 等. 产学研合作创新绩效影响因素元分析研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(6): 61-69.
[15] BATTAGLIA D, PAOLUCCI E, UGHETTO E. Hurdles in university-industry technology transfer: why research-based inventions are not transferred to the market[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024, 71: 13415-13427.
[16] 孙景昊, 何海燕. 区块链技术在国家实验室建设中的应用场景与现实挑战[J]. 科学管理研究, 2022, 40(1): 62-66.
[17] RAN C, SONG K, YANG L. An improved solution for partner selection of industry-university cooperation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2020, 32(12): 1478-1493.
[18] 陈丽, 梁秀波, 杨小虎. 基于多方协同的区块链技术人才培养体系的构建[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2021,38(4): 54-58.
[19] 罗化, 郭丽芳. 基于区块链技术的产学研信息共享模式研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2020, 40(6): 42-45.
[20] XU Y, XIAO S, WANG H, et al. Redactable blockchain-based secure and accountable data management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2024, 21(2): 1764-1776.
[21] LENG J, ZHOU M, ZHAO J L, et al. Blockchain security: a survey of techniques and research directions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2022, 15(4): 2490-2510.
[22] LIU Z, QIAN P, WANG X, et al. Combining graph neural networks with expert knowledge for smart contract vulnerability detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023, 35(2): 1296-1310.
[23] 刘丽杭, 唐丽萍. 产学研合作中信任对知识转移影响的仿真研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2022, 24(4): 1-9.
[24] 方刚, 王家辉. 基于区块链技术的协同创新知识共享研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(24): 130-140.
[25] DAS T K, TENG B S. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3): 491-512.
[26] WANG C C, SUNG H Y, CHEN D Z, et al. Strong ties and weak ties of the knowledge spillover network in the semiconductor industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 118: 114-127.
[27] WU L, SUN L, CHANG Q, et al. How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? a multiple case study based on resource integration perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 184: 122019.
[28] COHEN W M, LEVINTHAL D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
[29] 林崇德. 心理学大辞典(上卷)[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2003.
[30] 林海芬, 刘相彤, 苏敬勤. 从低位跟随到高位引领:行业引领型企业组织身份形成过程研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(9): 154-177.
[31] 史宇鹏, 李新荣. 公共资源与社会信任:以义务教育为例[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(5): 86-100.
[32] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
[33] 叶宝娟, 温忠麟. 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(9): 1050-1060.
[34] 王林辉, 姜昊, 董直庆. 工业智能化会重塑企业地理格局吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022,42(2): 137-155.