“专精特新”企业专栏

“专精特新”企业培育能否缓解企业创新“低端锁定”困境

  • 湛泳 ,
  • 马从文
展开
  • (湘潭大学 商学院,湖南 湘潭 411105)
湛泳(1976—),男,湖南益阳人,博士,湘潭大学商学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为技术创新与国防经济;马从文(1996—),男,江苏连云港人,湘潭大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向为公司治理与技术创新。本文通讯作者:马从文。

收稿日期: 2023-09-20

  修回日期: 2024-01-22

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AZD074,21AJY009);湖南省社会科学基金重大项目(22ZDA023)

Can the Cultivation of SRDI Enterprises Alleviate the Predicament of "Low-End Lock-In" of Enterprise Innovation?

  • Zhan Yong ,
  • Ma Congwen
Expand
  • (School of Business,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411005,China)

Received date: 2023-09-20

  Revised date: 2024-01-22

  Online published: 2025-02-10

摘要

中共二十大报告指出要完善科技创新体系,支持“专精特新”企业发展,解决关键技术领域“卡脖子”问题。运用双重差分模型检验“专精特新”企业培育对企业高端创新的作用机制及异质性特征。研究发现:①“专精特新”企业培育能助力企业高端创新,缓解企业创新“低端锁定”困境;②“专精特新”企业培育通过缓解企业融资约束、提高企业风险承担水平和增加分析师关注促进企业高端创新;③数字金融、数字化转型和高管海外背景能强化“专精特新”企业培育对企业高端创新的影响,而行业竞争则会削弱“专精特新”企业培育对企业高端创新的影响;④“专精特新”企业培育通过促进企业高端创新提高企业国际化深度。据此,提出完善“专精特新”企业培育政策和提高企业高端创新的相关建议。

本文引用格式

湛泳 , 马从文 . “专精特新”企业培育能否缓解企业创新“低端锁定”困境[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(3) : 130 -140 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023090614

Abstract

As China′s economy has reached a new normal of development, the traditional economic growth model has become insufficient, and the factor-driven and scale-expansion-oriented development mode cannot sustainably promote economic development; therefore, it is an urgent task for China to transform the development mode and realize high-quality and efficiency-oriented development. In realizing quality and efficiency-oriented development, high-end innovation is the key. According to the latest data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), China's R&D expenditure in 2022 exceeded 3 trillion yuan, while the intensity of R&D investment also increased significantly to 2.5%. These figures demonstrate that China has been committed to strengthening scientific and technological innovation to promote economic transformation and upgrading as well as sustainable development. However, although China has invested a lot of resources in scientific and technological innovation and made remarkable progress, the proportion of invention patents in the total number of patents granted in China in recent years has been around 20%, while this indicator of the United States has remained at around 90%, reflecting that China's current level of high-end innovation is low, and it is still in the trap of "locking in at the low end" of technological innovation. In particular, with the increasing complexity of the international political and economic situation, there is still a large gap between China and the developed countries in the field of high-end technology, and some key high-end technology is still dependent on imports, which will lead to China facing the plight of technological innovation "low-end lock-in" in some key industries, i.e., the degree of dependence on high-end technology is too high, which makes China easy to be constrained by others.Therefore, against the above backdrop, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore how to drive high-end innovation of enterprises for China to realize high-quality development and break through the predicament of "low-end lock-in" in technological innovation.
This study employs the double-difference method and empirically examines the impact, mechanism, heterogeneity and economic consequences of the cultivation of SRDI enterprises on the high-end innovation of enterprises. It takes 2015-2022 GEM, KIC and SMB listed companies as samples, and compiles "specialized, refined, differential and innovative" (SRDI) enterprises in SMB, KIC and GEM as processing groups by referring to SRDI enterprises recognized and cultivated by CnOpenData and CNRDS database; the invention patent data for measuring high-end innovation of enterprises is sourced from the CNRDS database, while the digital finance data is obtained from the Peking University Digital Inclusive Finance database. Besides, all other required data in the study are from the CSMAR database. Then, the samples with missing observations of variables are first excluded, followed by the samples of ST category and financial industry; and finally, the continuous variables involved in the paper are winsorized at the level of 1%.
The results show that the cultivation of SRDI enterprises enhances enterprises' high-end innovation and alleviates the predicament of "low-end lock-in" of enterprise innovation; the impact of SRDI enterprise cultivation on enterprises' high-end innovation is strengthened by alleviating financing constraints, improving enterprise risk-taking ability and increasing analysts' attention; the impact of SRDI enterprise cultivation on enterprises' high-end innovation is strengthened by digital finance, digital transformation, and the overseas backgrounds of executives; and the impact of SRDI enterprise cultivation on enterprises' high-end innovation is weakened by competition in the industry.
The findings suggest that, for SRDI enterprises, it is essential to invest in advanced digital technologies, value the diversity of their executive teams, and enhance their creativity and competitiveness by hiring executives with overseas experience, as well as to actively expand overseas markets and carry out international technological exchanges and cooperation; while the government should accelerate the construction of service platforms for SRDI enterprises and the promotion of digital finance, formulate more inclusive financial policies, and strengthen legislation to protect SRDI enterprises′ intellectual property rights and trade secrets to ensure that enterprises can compete in a fair environment.

参考文献

[1] 范明珠,王京,徐璟娜.异质性股东引入与企业创新质量——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2023,45(5):99-112.
[2] 杨瑾,杨敏.双元战略、制度支持与装备制造企业颠覆性创新[J].科研管理,2023,44(11):74-84.
[3] 齐红倩,张佳馨,陈苗.数字普惠金融促进中小企业创新效率研究——基于创新价值链视角[J].宏观经济研究,2023,18(10):23-40.
[4] 徐建斌,彭瑞娟,何凡.政府创新补贴提升数字经济企业研发强度了吗[J].经济管理,2023,45(4):172-190.
[5] CZARNITZKI D, HAND P, ROSA J M.Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a microeconometric study on canadian firms[J].Research Policy, 2011, 40(2):217-229.
[6] AGRAWAL A, ROSELL C, SIMCOE T.Tax credits and small firm R&D spending[J].American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2020, 12(2):1-21.
[7] 白旭云,王砚羽,苏欣.研发补贴还是税收激励——政府干预对企业创新绩效和创新质量的影响[J].科研管理,2019,40(6):9-18.
[8] 王永贵,李霞.促进还是抑制:政府研发补助对企业绿色创新绩效的影响[J].中国工业经济,2023,38(2):131-149.
[9] 丁建军,刘贤,王淀坤,等.国家级专精特新“小巨人”企业空间分布及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2022,42(10):109-118.
[10] 陈武元,蔡庆丰,程章继.高等学校集聚、知识溢出与专精特新“小巨人”企业培育[J].教育研究,2022,43(9):47-65.
[11] 敦帅,毛军权.营商环境如何驱动“专精特新”中小企业培育——基于组态视角的定性比较分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2023,25(2):78-92.
[12] 蔡双立,郭嫱.专精特新企业学术型高管与企业持续创新——企业激励机制与风险承担水平的双调节效应[J].浙江工商大学学报,2023,38(1):120-134.
[13] 曹虹剑,张帅,欧阳峣,等.创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J].中国工业经济,2022,37(11):135-154.
[14] 王跃堂,王国俊,彭洋.控制权性质影响税收敏感性吗——基于企业劳动力需求的检验[J].经济研究,2012,47(4):52-63.
[15] 罗进辉,闫家铭.亲清政商关系如何助力地区培育“专精特新”企业——以宁波市为例[J].财会月刊,2023,44(14):14-24.
[16] 侯伟凤,李健.深化“专精特新”企业金融服务[J].中国金融,2023,64(9):27-28.
[17] 尉晓亮,张庆,杨汉明.企业家情怀、风险承担能力与企业创新绩效[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(11):131-140.
[18] 谢芳.金融分析师关注、独立性与企业创新质量[J].南开经济研究,2021,37(3):162-176.
[19] CZARNITZKI D, HOTTENROTT H. R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2011, 36: 65-83.
[20] DELLAVIGNA S, POLLET J M. Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(2): 709-749.
[21] 吴先明,马子涵.产业政策促进企业创新的传递机制与情境条件——来自沪深A股上市公司的经验证据[J].当代经济管理,2024,46(1):31-42.
[22] 刘东阁,庞瑞芝.数字化转型能改善企业创新“低端锁定”困境吗——基于知识溢出的视角[J].山西财经大学学报,2023,45(5):84-98.
[23] BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? the winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.
[24] FERRARA E L, CHONG A, DURYEA S.Soap operas and fertility: evidence from Brazil[J].Research Department Publications, 2012,4(4): 1-31.
[25] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,49(5):614-620.
[26] HADLOCK C J, PIERCE J R.New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index[J].Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(5):1909-1940.
[27] FACCIO M, MARCHICA M T, MURA R. Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24(11): 3601-3641.
[28] BARTOLACCI F, CAPUTO A, SOVERCHIA M. Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: a bibliometric and systematic literature review[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(3): 1297-1309.
[29] 乔鹏程,徐祥兵.管理层海外经历、短视主义与企业创新:有调节的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(19):78-87.
[30] LIU H, LUO J H, CUI V.The impact of internationalization on home country charitable donation: evidence from Chinese firms[J].Management International Review, 2018, 58(2):313-335.
文章导航

/