科技管理创新

工业互联网平台如何驱动新质生产力发展——基于数据要素视角

  • 孙大明 ,
  • 胡苏敏 ,
  • 朱天一 ,
  • 黄菁菁
展开
  • (1.苏州科技大学 商学院,江苏 苏州 215009;2.南京理工大学 经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210094)
孙大明(1991—),女,辽宁葫芦岛人,博士,苏州科技大学商学院讲师,研究方向为数字创新;胡苏敏(1993—),女,江苏苏州人,博士,苏州科技大学商学院讲师,研究方向为创新管理;朱天一(1979—),女,江苏苏州人,博士,苏州科技大学商学院讲师,研究方向为数字经济;黄菁菁(1988—),女,广西河池人,博士,南京理工大学经济管理学院副教授,研究方向为创新管理。本文通讯作者:朱天一。

收稿日期: 2024-10-07

  修回日期: 2024-12-13

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(71904085);江苏省高校哲学社会科学项目(2021SJA1388);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L23BGL001)

How Industrial Internet Platform Drives the Development of New Quality Productive Forces: The Perspective of Data Elements

  • Sun Daming ,
  • Hu Sumin ,
  • Zhu Tianyi ,
  • Huang Jingjing
Expand
  • (1.Business School, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China;2.School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

Received date: 2024-10-07

  Revised date: 2024-12-13

  Online published: 2025-02-10

摘要

数字经济背景下,搭建工业互联网平台以推动新质生产力发展尤为重要。结合组态视角与复杂性关系理论,采用混合QCA和空间回归方法构建复杂中介模型,深入探究数据要素视角下工业互联网平台如何驱动新质生产力发展。研究发现:多种工业互联网平台组态能充分释放数据要素价值(数据要素应用、数据要素维护、数字人才集聚),进而驱动新质生产力发展,具体表现为云服务—核心平台驱动型、边缘—大数据平台驱动型和全平台驱动型3种模式。研究结论对全面推进平台化战略、加速新质生产力发展具有重要启示。

本文引用格式

孙大明 , 胡苏敏 , 朱天一 , 黄菁菁 . 工业互联网平台如何驱动新质生产力发展——基于数据要素视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(3) : 38 -49 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.W202410014

Abstract

In the context of digital China, how to build a strong industrial internet platform to promote the development of new quality productive forces is particularly important. As the product of the deep integration of digitalization and industrialization under the new industrial revolution, the industrial internet platform can realize the ubiquitous connection, flexible supply, and intelligent decision-making of manufacturing resources and is a strategic infrastructure to accelerate the formation of new quality productive forces. At present, how to build an effective industrial internet platform architecture to bridge the gap in the use of data elements and promote the development of new quality productive forces is a key problem to be solved.
This study selects 278 cities in China as research samples, and employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating qualitative comparative analysis with regression analysis, to develop a sophisticated mediation model. This methodology is designed to provide a comprehensive view of the intricate interactions among variables. The study combines the relationship between configuration perspective and complexity, and uses mixed QCA and spatial regression analysis methods to analyze how the industrial internet platform drives the development of new quality productive forces from the perspective of data elements in a more granular manner. The results show that (1) the configuration analysis shows that all industrial internet platforms fully release the value of data elements in the way of "different paths lead to the same goal". Specifically, there are six paths for data element application, which can be classified into three modes: cloud service-core platform-driven, edge computing-driven, and edge-cloud service-core platform-driven. There is only one path for data element maintenance, which is platform driven. While there are four paths for the aggregation of digital talents, which can be classified into three modes: edge-big data platform-driven, distributed platform-driven under non-high cloud services, and distributed platform-driven under non-high data. (2) The complex intermediary mechanism shows that the four configurations of cloud service-core platform-driven, full platform-driven, and edge-big data platform-driven fully unleash the value of data elements, thereby driving the development of new quality productive forces. However, due to some incomplete architectures, while improving data elements, there are still difficulties in enterprise cloud migration, inflexible platform architecture, and low data utilization efficiency, which is insufficient to achieve a qualitative enhancement in productivity.
The article's marginal contributions are threefold. First, it pioneers a shift in focus from viewing industrial internet platforms as monolithic entities to recognizing them as collaborative ecosystems of sub-platforms, driving the evolution of new quality productive forces. This approach significantly diverges from traditional research, thereby broadening the scope and application range of digital platform studies. Second, it innovatively introduces the perspective of data elements, combines the relationship between configuration ideas and complexity, and reveals the complex relationship between the configuration of industrial internet platform and the development of new quality productive forces in a more granular way, which has important practical significance for the development of new quality productive forces in China under the complex system view. Third, this study develops a hybrid method of QCA and spatial regression analysis, providing new ideas and methods for analyzing complex mediation problems and expanding the statistical applications of complex mediation models in digital contexts.
The management implications are as follows:First, from the perspective of complex systems, it is necessary to grasp the "diversity of platforms" and "concentration of combinations" to avoid the development dilemma of constructing a single platform. Second, it is imperative to expedite the ongoing cycle of data element accumulation, application, maintenance, and development. This proactive management of data elements will empower industrial internet platforms and their applications to extend their reach into a broader range of industries and domains. Third, it is essential to adhere to the concept of the system, focus on the grand strategy of "digital China" ,and advance the convergence and integration of policies related to industrial Internet, digital transformation and the development of new quality productive forces.

参考文献

[1] WOLLSCHLAEGER M, SAUTER T, JASPERNEITE J. The future of industrial communication: automation networks in the era of the internet of things and industry 4.0[J]. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 2017,11(1):17-27.
[2] 王节祥, 陈威如, 龚奕潼, 等. 工业互联网平台构建中如何应对“个性与共性”矛盾——基于树根互联的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(1): 155-180.
[3] 钞小静, 周文慧, 刘亚颖.工业互联网与制造业企业全要素生产率[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(7): 5-19.
[4] 吕文晶, 陈劲, 刘进. 工业互联网的智能制造模式与企业平台建设——基于海尔集团的案例研究[J]. 中国软科学,2019,34(7):1-13.
[5] 王水莲,付晗涵.工业互联网平台主导的创新生态系统价值共创机制——以海尔卡奥斯为例[J/OL].科技进步与对策,1-9[2024-12-27].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.g3.20240410.1501.028.html.
[6] LI H, YANG Z C, et al. How an industrial internet platform empowers the digital transformation of SMEs: theoretical mechanism and business model[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2023, 27(1): 105-120.
[7] 任保平.工业互联网发展的本质与态势分析[J].人民论坛,2021,30(18):88-91.
[8] 孙新波, 刘剑桥, 张明超, 等. 工业互联网平台赋能参与型制造企业价值链数字重构绩效的组态分析[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(6): 811-820.
[9] ARNOLD C, KIEL D, VOIGT K I.How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2016, 20(8):5-35.
[10] HOFMAN E, HALMAN J I M, LOOY B V.Do design rules facilitate or complicate architectural innovation in innovation alliance networks[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(7): 1436-1448.
[11] WEI R, GEIGER S, VIZE R.Managing paradoxical tensions in platform-based modular solution networks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 100: 96-111.
[12] GUTH J, BREITENBUCHER U, FALKENTHAL M, et al. A detailed analysis of IoT platform architectures: concepts, similarities, and differences[J]. Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies, Technologies and Perspectives, 2018,5(4):81-101.
[13] 陈武, 陈建安, 李燕萍. 工业互联网平台:内涵、演化与赋能[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(5): 189-208.
[14] FERNANDEZ-ROVIRA C, VALDES J A, MOLLEVI G, et al. The digital transformation of business. towards the datafication of the relationship with customers[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 162: 120339.
[15] HUO B, HAQ M Z U, GU M. The impact of information sharing on supply chain learning and flexibility performance[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(5): 1411-1434.
[16] ZAKI M. Digital transformation harnessing digital technologies for the next generation of service[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2019, 33(4): 429-435.
[17] SENYO P K, LIU K, EFFAH J. Digital business ecosystem: literature review and a framework for future research[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 47: 52-64.
[18] LENKA S, PARIDA V, WINCENT J. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2017, 34(1): 92-100.
[19] 焦豪. 数字平台生态观:数字经济时代的管理理论新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023,41(7): 122-141.
[20] XING. The knowledge system of composite talents based on the development of virtual digital people[J]. Journal of Electrical Systems, 2024, 20(7s): 3386-3399.
[21] 谭洪波, 耿志超. 数据要素驱动新质生产力:理论逻辑、现实挑战和推进路径[J].价格理论与实践, 2024,44(5): 39-44,145.
[22] 焦方义, 杜瑄. 数据要素加快新质生产力发展的政治经济学分析[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2024,43(8): 1-13,43.
[23] MEUER J, RUPIETTA C. Integrating QCA and HLM for multilevel research on organizational configurations[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2017, 20(2): 324-342.
[24] 周密, 王雷, 郭佳宏. 新质生产力背景下数实融合的测算与时空比较——基于专利共分类方法的研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(7): 5-27.
[25] 王珏, 王荣基. 新质生产力:指标构建与时空演进[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2024, 37 (1): 31-47.
[26] 阳杨,郭佳钦,王少国.新质生产力、创业活跃度与城市高质量发展[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(22):1-12.
[27] 韩文龙,张瑞生,赵峰.新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(6):5-25.
[28] 陈福中,蒋国海,董康银.数字经济对制造业绿色转型的空间溢出效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(5): 114-125.
[29] 肖有智, 张晓兰, 刘欣. 新质生产力与企业内部薪酬差距——基于共享发展视角[J]. 经济评论, 2024,44(3): 75-91.
文章导航

/