基于2012—2022年A股制造业企业数据,构建新质生产力定量测度指标,并实证检验企业数实技术融合对新质生产力的影响及作用机制,研究发现企业数实技术融合促进新质生产力提升。机制检验表明,在企业转型升级方面,数实技术融合通过企业高科技化、高效能化、高端化转型升级提升新质生产力;从生产关系角度看,企业国有属性、企业间竞争、企业间合作、政府调控在数实技术融合提升新质生产力过程中发挥正向调节作用。进一步分析发现,在数字基础设施差、数字创新能力弱的地区,数字产业化企业无法通过数实技术融合对新质生产力发展产生促进作用;在数字基础设施较差、数字创新能力较弱的地区,产业数字化企业可以通过数实技术融合提升新质生产力发展水平;在数字基础设施好、数字创新能力强的地区,新型实体企业通过数实技术融合促进新质生产力发展的作用更加显著。
Amid the rapid progression of technological and industrial revolutions, China's traditional low-cost advantages are gradually diminishing, necessitating a shift toward competitive advantages grounded in core technologies. In response to this pivotal transformation, President Xi Jinping proposed the theory of "new quality productive forces", summarizing the developmental trajectory of advanced productive forces, and the recent trends in technological innovation, intelligentization, and green development, along with the crucial role of new technologies, industries, business models, and forms in contemporary productivity growth. The concept of new quality productivity has emerged in the wake of the digital economy's rapid expansion in recent years. This burgeoning economic paradigm is increasingly integrating with, enhancing, and redefining the contours of the real economy, serving as a pivotal force in its structural evolution and transformative energy dynamics. In this new phase of rapid technological and industrial transformations, the deep integration of the digital and real economies has become an essential pathway for advancing new quality productive forces.
To drive the development of new quality productive forces through the integration of the digital and real economies, it is essential to foster the convergence of digital and physical technologies. This convergence creates both the necessity and possibility for the integration of the digital and real economies. On one hand, digital technological innovation and application can leverage the diversity and rich application scenarios of physical technologies, accelerating the fusion of digital technologies with various applications and promoting the transformation of scientific achievements into actual productivity. This facilitates the scaling and industrialization of emerging technological fields, enabling enterprises to explore new domains and create new opportunities, thus providing new momentum for the development of new quality productive forces. On the other hand, physical technological innovation and the digital transformation of enterprises can capitalize on the additive, synergistic, and multiplying effects of digital technologies. This drives digital and intelligent transformation across R&D, production, and distribution processes, enhancing cost reduction, efficiency improvement, and revenue growth. It promotes the advancement of foundational capabilities and fosters new technologies, business models, and forms, all of which contribute to the development of new quality productive forces.
Therefore, this study, using data from China's A-share manufacturing enterprises from 2012 to 2022, explores the impact and mechanisms of digital-physical technology integration on the development of new quality productive forces. In light of the three foundational elements of new quality workers, production tools, and labor, this study expands upon these by incorporating the dimensions of technological innovation, digital transformation, and sustainable development. It proposes new indicators to evaluate the productivity of this new quality labor force. It is found that the integration of digital and physical technologies significantly promotes the improvement of new quality productive forces in enterprises. By exploring the mechanisms of enterprise transformation and upgrading, the study confirms that the integration of digital and physical technologies enhances new quality productive forces through channels such as high-tech, high-efficiency, and high-end transformations; it further reveals the role of production relations, demonstrating that the ownership attributes of state-owned enterprises, intensified inter-enterprise competition, deepened inter-enterprise cooperation, and government regulation all contribute to the enhancement of new quality productive forces through digital-physical technology integration;it uncovers that digital industrialization enterprises, industry digitalization enterprises, and new real economy enterprises are differentially influenced by regional digital infrastructure and digital innovation capabilities in terms of how digital-physical technology integration drives new-quality productive forces development.
In brief, this study provides a new quantitative measurement of new quality productive forces, and the findings of this study enrich the literature on the measurement methods and mechanisms of new quality productive forces and provide data-based evidence for the formulation of relevant policies. Future studies could examine the technological dichotomy between digital and physical technologies. Additionally, it would be insightful to investigate how the maturity and modularity of physical technologies influence their integration with digital counterparts. Beyond the synthesis of digital and physical technologies, future studies might also focus on the dynamic interplay and convergence of digital economy constituents—such as data elements and digital platforms—with traditional real economy components. This convergence at the elemental level can be perceived as a mechanism for integrating the digital and real economies.
[1] 习近平主持召开新时代推动东北全面振兴座谈会强调 牢牢把握东北的重要使命 奋力谱写东北全面振兴新篇章[N].人民日报,2023-09-10(01).
[2] 加快发展新质生产力 扎实推进高质量发展[N].人民日报,2024-02-02(01).
[3] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023,39(10):1-13.
[4] 洪银兴,任保平.数字经济与实体经济深度融合的内涵和途径[J].中国工业经济,2023,40(2):5-16.
[5] 张姣玉,徐政,丁守海.数实深度融合与新质生产力双向交互的逻辑机理、战略价值与实践路径[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(3):114-124.
[6] 习近平经济思想研究中心.新质生产力的内涵特征和发展重点[N].人民日报,2024-03-01(009).
[7] 任保平.以产业数字化和数字产业化协同发展推进新型工业化[J].改革,2023,39(11):28-37.
[8] 王水莲,钱鹏浩,王静.场景赋能驱动下的工业互联网平台成长演化——“柠檬豆”案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(6):11-20.
[9] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么[J].经济研究,2018,53(5):28-41.
[10] ACEMOGLU D,P RESTREPO.Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2019,33(2):3-30.
[11] 许晨曦,孟大虎.国有企业协同创新的内在逻辑、模式构建与行动策略[J].求是学刊,2023,50(2):81-91.
[12] 王煜昊,马野青.新质生产力、企业创新与供应链韧性:来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J].新疆社会科学,2024,44(3):68-82.
[13] 宋佳,张金昌,潘艺.ESG发展对企业新质生产力影响的研究——来自中国A股上市企业的经验证据[J].当代经济管理,2024,46(6):1-11.
[14] 杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,2015,31(1):75-98.
[15] 王超,余典范,龙睿.经济政策不确定性与企业数字化——垫脚石还是绊脚石[J].经济管理,2023,45(6):79-100.
[16] 张琦,郑瑶,孔东民.地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资——一项基于《环境空气质量标准(2012)》的准自然实验[J].经济研究,2019,54(6):183-198.
[17] 唐要家,王钰,唐春晖.数字经济、市场结构与创新绩效[J].中国工业经济,2022,39(10):62-80.
[18] HOWITT PAGHION P.Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth[J].Journal of Economic Growth,1998,3(2):111-130.
[19] 邵敏,黄玖立.外资与我国劳动收入份额——基于工业行业的经验研究[J].经济学季刊,2010,9(4):1189-1210.
[20] 王磊,王琼,庞莹.中间品进口与制造业企业技术创新模式的选择——基于世界银行调查数据的实证分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2019,37(6):28-49.
[21] 王军,朱杰,罗茜.中国数字经济发展水平及演变测度[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(7):26-42.