企业创新管理

数字能力对在华跨国公司数字创新绩效的影响机制——基于fsQCA的研究

  • 程聪 ,
  • 胡嘉阳
展开
  • (1.浙江工业大学 中国中小企业研究院;2.浙江工业大学 管理学院,浙江 杭州310023)
程聪(1985—),男,浙江临安人,博士,浙江工业大学中国中小企业研究院研究员,研究方向为企业跨国并购与数字创新管理;胡嘉阳(1999—),男,台湾高雄人,浙江工业大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为企业跨国并购与数字创新管理。

收稿日期: 2023-02-06

  修回日期: 2023-06-25

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-17

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71772164,72032008);研究阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA013)

The Impact Mechanism of Digital Capabilities on the Digital Innovation Performance of Multinational Corporations in China:An Analysis Based on fsQCA

  • Cheng Cong ,
  • Hu Jiayang
Expand
  • (1. China Institute of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises,Zhejiang University of Technology;2. School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)

Received date: 2023-02-06

  Revised date: 2023-06-25

  Online published: 2024-10-17

摘要

随着数字技术快速发展,数字能力成为影响跨国公司数字创新绩效的重要途径。为了探究数字能力对跨国公司数字创新绩效的影响机制,以40家在华跨国公司为例,基于动态能力理论分析框架,采用模糊集定性比较分析法探讨数字连接情境下在华跨国公司数字创新绩效影响因素间的复杂关系,以及在华跨国公司数字创新绩效提升路径。结果显示,产品创新绩效很大程度上会受到数字连接能力与企业资源偏好的影响;流程创新绩效中,数字智能应用、数字资源投入与分配能够促进流程创新绩效提升。结论可拓展在华跨国公司数字创新绩效相关研究,为在华跨国公司提升创新绩效提供实践启示。

本文引用格式

程聪 , 胡嘉阳 . 数字能力对在华跨国公司数字创新绩效的影响机制——基于fsQCA的研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(19) : 91 -99 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023020147

Abstract

With the continuous development of the digital age, global digital connectivity has not only changed the logic of production and life in today's society, but also affected the digital innovation logic of multinational corporations and posed challenges to multinational corporations. How to improve digital innovation performance through digital capabilities in the context of digital connectivity has become a key issue for multinational corporations in China to achieve global profit maximization. Digital capability is a key capability centered around digital connectivity and includes three elements: digital connectivity capability, digital integration capability, and intelligent decision-making. Digital connectivity capability includes digital technology, digital platform architecture, and digital intelligence. There is a lack of comprehensive analysis of the impact of multiple capabilities on the performance of digital innovation in enterprises in the existing studies. In addition, since digital connectivity has impacted the analytical framework of dynamic capabilities in traditional contexts, it is necessary to embed digital connectivity scenarios in the framework of dynamic capabilities, focusing digital integration capability and intelligent decision-making on the interaction relationships between multiple elements of digital connectivity capability, and conducting research on the matching relationship between digital connectivity capability, digital integration capability, intelligent decision-making, and the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations. In terms of digital innovation performance of multinational corporations, due to the fact that existing research often focuses on result orientation and neglects the important role of processes in it, this article divides the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations into product innovation performance and process innovation performance.
Overall, within the dynamic capability analysis framework, this study defines five antecedents and explores the impact of their different combinations on the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations in the context of digital connectivity. It uses the fsQCA method to delve into the multi-factor synergistic effects among various elements in digital capabilities and the complex causal mechanisms that affect the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations, and selects a total of 40 representative multinational corporations from the China Top 100 Multinational Companies List as the research subjects. The research results indicate that, firstly, from an overall perspective, no single antecedent condition can independently serve as a necessary condition for affecting the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations. Secondly, the configurations that affect product innovation performance can be summarized as being digital connectivity capability-driven and resource-driven;the configurations that affect the performance of process innovation can be summarized as being intelligent-driven and resource-driven. Finally, compared to process innovation performance, resource-driven product innovation performance relies more on digital platform architecture.
On the basis of the research findings, this article proposes that, firstly, multinational corporations need to attach importance to the cultivation and application of digital connectivity capabilities, and actively develop the role of digital technology, digital platform architecture, and digital intelligence in the performance of digital innovation in the context of digital connectivity. Secondly, they need to clarify their corporate positioning, focus on internal and external resource allocation, construct corporate resource integration strategies, and fully develop their digital integration capabilities. Finally, it is essential to improve the level of digital intelligence utilization and promote the development of enterprise digital innovation. In addition, this article makes three theoretical contributions: it reveals the mechanism by which digital capabilities affect the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations, expanding existing research and deepening understanding of digital connectivity;then it analyzes the shortcomings of existing research through a combination of product innovation performance and process innovation performance, effectively enhancing the comprehensiveness and objectivity of the research;and finally, it provides a new analytical perspective and evidence for the digital innovation performance of multinational corporations in China in the context of digital connectivity by fsQCA.

参考文献

[1] LUO Y. New connectivity in the fragmented world[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2022,53(5): 962-980.
[2]LIANG S,LI T. Can digital transformation promote innovation performance in manufacturing enterprises? the mediating role of R&D capability[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(17):10939.
[3]陈剑,刘运辉. 数智化使能运营管理变革:从供应链到供应链生态系统[J]. 管理世界,2021,37(11): 227-240.
[4]SEGARRA-CIPRES M,ESCRIG-TENA A,GARCIA-JUAN B. Employees' proactive behavior and innovation performance examining the moderating role of informal and formal controls[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management,2019,22(5): 866-888.
[5]MONAGHAN S,TIPPMANN E,COVIELLO N. Born digitals: thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2020,51(1): 11-22.
[6]TEECE D. A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2014,45(1): 8-37.
[7]VERBEKE A. Three simple guidelines to make the dynamic capabilities paradigm actionable in international business research[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2022,53(4): 573-582.
[8]WANG X,GU Y,AHMAD M,et al. The impact of digital capability on manufacturing company performance[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(10): 6214.
[9]ANNARELLI A,BATTISTELLA C,NONINO F,et al. Literature review on digitalization capabilities:co-citation analysis of antecedents,conceptualization and consequences[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021,166: 120635.
[10] 张媛,孙新波,钱雨. 传统制造企业数字化转型中的价值创造与演化——资源编排视角的纵向单案例研究[J]. 经济管理,2022,44(4): 116-133.
[11]YU H,HE D N,WANG G Y,et al. Big data for intelligent decision making[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica,2020,46(5): 878-896.
[12]TAO F,QI Q,WANG L,et al. Digital twins and cyber-physical systems toward smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: correlation and comparison[J]. Engineering,2019,5(4): 653-661.
[13]郑帅,王海军. 数字化转型何以影响枢纽企业创新绩效——基于模块化视角的实证研究[J]. 科研管理,2022,43(11): 73-82.
[14]严国莉,王保林. 数字平台利基创造力研究[J]. 中国软科学,2022,38(12): 112-124.
[15]廖民超,金佳敏,蒋玉石,等. 数字平台能力与制造业服务创新绩效——网络能力和价值共创的链式中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,2023,40(5): 55-63.
[16]MORENO M,COURT R,WRIGHT M,et al. Opportunities for redistributed manufacturing and digital intelligence as enablers of a circular economy[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering,2019,12(2): 77-94.
[17]GUO Y,WANG N,XU Z Y,et al. The internet of things-based decision support system for information processing in intelligent manufacturing using data mining technology[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2020,142: 106630.
[18]杨杰,汪涛,王新. 众筹互动对产品创新绩效的影响研究——基于京东众筹平台科技类产品众筹的实证分析[J]. 软科学,2022,36(9): 97-102,109.
[19]LUCA L M D,GIMA K A. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance[J]. Journal of Marketing,2007,71(1): 95-112.
[20]HERVAS-OLIVER J L,SEMPERE-RIPOLL F,ROJAS ALVARADO R,et al. Beyond product innovation: deciphering process-oriented innovators,complementarities and performance effects[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2017,30(5): 582-595.
[21]NAZARI F,ANARAKI A R,TAGHAVI S S,et al. The relationship among knowledge-based dynamic process capabilities,innovation processes and innovation performance: an empirical study of knowledge-based high-tech companies in Iran[J]. Kybernetes,2020,50(5): 1379-1404.
[22]林艳,卢俊尧. 什么样的数字创新生态系统能提高区域创新绩效——基于NCA与QCA的研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2022,39(24): 19-28.
[23]胡昌平,吕美娇. 数字智能驱动下的信息资源管理理论发展[J]. 信息资源管理学报,2022,12(4): 4-11.
[24]BRECHT P,NIEVER M,KERRES R,et al. Smart platform experiment cycle (SPEC): a process to design,analyze,and validate digital platforms[J]. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing,2021,35(2): 209-225.
[25]SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2012.
[26]张明,杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位,策略和方向[J]. 管理学报,2019,16(9): 1312-1323.
[27]RAGIN C C. Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage[J]. Political Analysis,2006,14(3): 291-310.
文章导航

/