区域科学发展

数字化下区域创新生态系统的组织与机制演进——基于中关村科技园区的纵向案例研究

  • 王海军 ,
  • 贺子桐 ,
  • 马晓琳 ,
  • 赵惠妍 ,
  • 束超慧
展开
  • (1.沈阳工业大学 管理学院,辽宁 沈阳 110870;2.辽宁科技大学 工商管理学院,辽宁 鞍山 114051)
王海军(1977—),男,安徽滁州人,博士,沈阳工业大学管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为科技创新管理、模块化等;贺子桐(1996—),女,辽宁鞍山人,沈阳工业大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新生态系统、数字化创新等;马晓琳(1979—),女,辽宁鞍山人,博士,辽宁科技大学工商管理学院教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为科技创新管理等;赵惠妍(1998—),女,辽宁抚顺人,沈阳工业大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为模块化、智能制造等;束超慧(1994—),女,安徽芜湖人,沈阳工业大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为颠覆性技术创新、创新网络、模块化。本文通讯作者:王海军。

收稿日期: 2023-05-19

  修回日期: 2023-06-26

  网络出版日期: 2024-09-10

基金资助

辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L22BGL038)

Organization and Mechanism Evolution of Regional Innovation Ecosystem in Digitalization: A Longitudinal Case Study of Zhongguancun Science Park

  • Wang Haijun ,
  • He Zitong ,
  • Ma Xiaolin ,
  • Zhao Huiyan ,
  • Shu Chaohui
Expand
  • (1.School of management, Shenyang University of technology, Shenyang 110870,China;2.School of Business Administration, University of Science and Technology Liaoning,Anshan 114051,China)

Received date: 2023-05-19

  Revised date: 2023-06-26

  Online published: 2024-09-10

摘要

数字化如何驱动区域创新生态系统结构与机制演进?锚定该问题,构建“情景—组织—机制”框架,对中关村科技园区进行纵向案例研究。研究表明:①数字化情景以创新主体、创新资源、创新环境为触点,园区组织结构呈现“聚合化—网络化—生态化”发展态势;②数字化下园区创新生态系统的创新机制聚焦在适应、互动和共生3个维度,其中,在市场需求的适应机制上,案例样本在时间线上呈现出“被动适应—主动适应—引领适应”的变异特征;在与合作资源的互动机制上,则沿着“资源共享—知识转移—利益分配”的路径迭代;在系统主体间共生机制上,表现出“寄生共生—偏利共生—互利共生”的演进轨迹。

本文引用格式

王海军 , 贺子桐 , 马晓琳 , 赵惠妍 , 束超慧 . 数字化下区域创新生态系统的组织与机制演进——基于中关村科技园区的纵向案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(17) : 32 -43 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.YXW202305102

Abstract

At present, China's regional innovation development has evolved into an innovation ecosystem model. The regional innovation ecosystem is an open system characterized by multi-subjects, multilateral relations and multi-level structure. Under the background of digitalization, the regional innovation ecosystem relies on the connectivity and aggregation characteristics of digital technology to reshape and mutate the organizational structure and innovation mechanism of the ecosystem. In turn, digitalization triggers the iteration and restructuring of innovation elements and organizational paradigms in regional innovation ecosystems, as well as the upgrading of evolutionary paths. In the existing research, there is still an obvious gap in the exploratory research and practice of regional innovation ecosystems under digitization, and thus the existing research has failed to explore the evolution of regional innovation ecosystems' structure and mechanism from the perspective of digitization.#br#In view of this, in order to clarify the evolution process of the structure and mechanism of the regional innovation ecosystem against the backdrop of digital innovation, this paper analyzes the development practice of Zhongguancun Hi-tech Industrial Development Zone for more than 30 years, and forms a triangular validation by means of in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and other first-hand and second-hand data. By coding the data at three levels, 18 first-order concepts, 9 second-order themes and 3 aggregated constructs are formed for the analysis of the evolution process of the structure and mechanism of the regional innovation ecosystem under digitalization.#br#It is found that the evolution of the digital regional innovation ecosystem is based on the specialization of innovation subjects, diversification of innovation resources and sound innovation environment as a starting point, relying on digital technology and data elements to aggregate, connect, and integrate innovation subjects and external innovation resources, and ultimately realizing the value of co-creativity of the regional innovation ecosystem, forming the characteristics of "information-based industrial aggregation—networked industrial ecology—digital regional ecology", and ultimately presenting the process of the evolution of the organizational structure of "aggregated-networked-ecological". Moreover, contexts dominate the digital change of the ecosystem collaborative innovation management model, and the regional innovation ecosystem is interpreted in terms of the three contextual dimensions of the innovation subject, innovation resources, and innovation environment. Specifically, innovation subjects rely on digital technology for role change, while innovation resources between heterogeneous subjects realize integration and synergy under the evolution of the innovation environment. Finally, the mechanism evolution path of regional innovation ecosystem under digitalization is summarized as follows: (1) the adaptation mechanism evolves according to the path of "passive adaptation—active adaptation—leading adaptation" based on the adaptation of the needs of the innovation subject; (2) the interaction mechanism makes the interaction of innovation resources evolve according to the path of "resource aggregation—knowledge transfer—value co-creating"; (3) the symbiosis mechanism evolves the innovation elements according to the path of "parasitism—biased symbiosis—mutual benefit symbiosis".#br#In summary, this paper proposes the organization and evolution mechanism of the regional innovation ecosystem under digitalization, which provides useful reference for the digital construction of the regional innovation ecosystem. The regional innovation ecosystem relies on digital technology to connect and unite industrial chain innovation subjects, and improve the competitiveness of regional industries as a whole. Thus, it realizes the complementary advantages between innovation subjects and optimizes the interaction of innovation resources. There are still certain limitations to this study. First, this paper adopts the exploratory vertical single-case study method. Limited by the number of research objects, the universality of the research conclusions needs further discussion. Multiple case studies or cross-industry studies can be conducted in the future to further test the conclusions drawn from this study. Second, the exploration of specific management mechanisms is still limited, and it is necessary to analyze the functional principles of the mechanisms through quantitative means in the future. Finally, the Zhongguancun Science and Technology Park is taken as the main support for innovation elements in this study, with a focus on the interaction and collaboration of internal innovation elements in the system. However, there are still limitations in exploring the distribution and external innovation elements in the region, which await future research.#br#

参考文献

[1] 李晓娣,张小燕.区域创新生态系统对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].预测,2018,37(5):22-28,55.
[2] 布和础鲁,陈玲.数字创新生态系统:概念、结构及创新机制[J].中国科技论坛,2022,39(9):54-62.
[3] 杨力,尚超,杨建超.共生理论视角下区域创新生态系统演化特征研究[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(11):71-81.
[4] HESS T, MATT C, BENLIAN A, et al. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy[J].MIS Quarterly Executive, 2016, 15(2):123-139.
[5] SUNDARARAJAN A.The sharing economy:the end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism [M].America:MIT Press,2016.
[6] MARTIN K. The penalty for privacy violations:how privacy violations impact trust online [J].Journal of Business Research,2018,82(1):103-116.
[7] 刘洁,栗志慧.数字化背景下区域创新生态系统评价研究——以北京市为例[J].时代经贸,2022,19(7):116-123.
[8] COOKE P. Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe [J].Geoforum, 1992, 23(3): 365-382.
[9] PCAST. Sustaining the nation's innovation ecosystems, information technology manufacturing and competitiveness [R].2004a.
[10] PCAST.Sustaining the nation's innovation ecosystems, maintaining the strength of our science engineering capabilities[R].2004b.
[11] BUTLER J,GIBSON D.Research universities in the framework of regional innovation ecosystem: the case of Austin,Texas[J].Foresight and STI Governance, 2013, 7(2):42-57.
[12] ADNER R, KAPOOR R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(3):306-333.
[13] 王京,陈伟,高长元,等.云制造联盟创新生态系统形成、模型构建及演化研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(19):53-58.
[14] 解学梅,韩宇航,代梦鑫.企业开放式创新生态系统种群共生关系与演化机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(21):85-95.
[15] WARNER K S R, WAGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation:an ongoing process of strategic renewal[J].Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349.
[16] TAUSCHER K, LAUDIEN S. Understanding platform business models:a mixed methods study of marketplaces[J]. European Management Journal, 2018,36(3):319-329.
[17] FRANKE N,VON HIPPEL E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits:the case of apache security software [J].Research Policy,2003,32(7):1199-1215.
[18] KANE G, PALMER D. Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation [J].MIT Sloan Management Review, 2015,14(1):1-25.
[19] 郑帅,王海军.模块化下企业创新生态系统结构与演化机制——海尔集团2005—2019年的纵向案例研究[J].科研管理, 2021,42(1):33-46.
[20] 曹玉娟.数字化驱动下区域科技创新的框架变化与范式重构[J].学术论坛, 2019,42(1):110-116.
[21] 陈劲.企业创新生态系统论[M].北京:科学出版社, 2017.
[22] ISCKIA T, DE REUVER M, LESCOP D. Orchestrating platform ecosystems: the interplay of innovation and business development subsystems [J].Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2020,2(32): 197-223.
[23] JHA S K, PINSONNEAULT A, DUBE L. The evolution of an ict platform-enabled ecosystem for poverty alleviation [J].MIS Quarterly, 2016,40(2):431-446.
[24] EISENHARDT K. Building theories from case study research [J].The Academy of Management Review, 1989,14(4):532-550.
[25] MURMANN J. The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments [J].Organization Science, 2013,24(1):58-78.
[26] EISENHARDT K, GRAEBNER M. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
[27] SALDANA J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Second Edition) [M].Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
[28] MERRIAM S, TISDELL E. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation [M].San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[29] ADNER R, PURANAM P, ZHU F. What is different about digital strategy? from quantitative to qualitative change [J].Strategy Science,2019,4(4):253-261.
[30] BHARADWAJ A, EL SAWY O, PAVLOU P, et al. Digital business strategy: towards a next generation of insights [J].MIS Quarterly,2013,37(2):471-482.
[31] 陈国青,任明,卫强,等.数智赋能:信息系统研究的新跃迁[J].管理世界, 2022,38(1):180-196.
[32] ZITTRAIN J.The generative internet[J].Harvard Law Review,2006,119(7):1974-2040.
[33] CENNAMO C. Competing in digital markets: a platform-based perspective[J].Academy of Management Perspectives, 2021,35(2): 265-291.
文章导航

/