企业创新管理

创客思维如何促发企业内部运营生态变革——基于《任正非采访实录》的分析

  • 郭会斌 ,
  • 霍晓明 ,
  • 王新爱
展开
  • (1.河北经贸大学 工商管理学院,河北 石家庄 050061;2.中南财经政法大学 工商管理学院,湖北 武汉 430073; 3.三亚学院 管理学院,海南 三亚 572000)
郭会斌(1968—),男,河北新乐人,博士,河北经贸大学工商管理学院教授,中南财经政法大学工商管理学院教授,研究方向为人力资源管理、创新创业战略;霍晓明(1995—),女,河北石家庄人,河北经贸大学工商管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为人力资源管理;王新爱(1981—),女,河北任丘人,三亚学院管理学院副教授,研究方向为组织创新。本文通讯作者:王新爱。

收稿日期: 2023-02-28

  修回日期: 2023-04-22

  网络出版日期: 2024-07-25

基金资助

河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(ZD202103);韩国研究财团机构项目(2021S1A5A2A0306212811);海南省哲学社会科学规划课题项目(HNSKYB20-48);海南省自然科学基金项目(722RC737)

How Maker Mindset Promotes the Reform of Enterprises' Internal Operation Ecosystem: Text Analyses on Ren Zhengfei Meeting the Press

  • Guo Huibin ,
  • Huo Xiaoming ,
  • Wang Xinai
Expand
  • (1.School of Business Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China;2.School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China;3.Department of Management, University of Sanya, Sanya 572000, China)

Received date: 2023-02-28

  Revised date: 2023-04-22

  Online published: 2024-07-25

摘要

通过对华为创始人任正非2019—2020年44次接受国内外媒体采访的53.1万字采访实录进行文本分析,采用程序化扎根理论归纳任正非的思维构型,并对其创客思维如何促发特定时期华为内部运营生态变革进行探索。结果发现,任正非的创客思维包括自我批判、持续学习、艰苦奋斗等,由此归纳出SUCCESS数字领导力理论。以此为基础,华为建立起有效的运营机制,并从人才生态、治理生态、技术生态与开放生态4个方面促使内部运营生态变革。结论可丰富原有领导力理论,为创客应对不确定性环境风险提供有益启示。

本文引用格式

郭会斌 , 霍晓明 , 王新爱 . 创客思维如何促发企业内部运营生态变革——基于《任正非采访实录》的分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(14) : 83 -92 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023020638

Abstract

With digital technologies, such as big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, blockchain and so on, gradually changing the fundamentals of the industrial economy, modern society has entered the era of the digital economy.For the economic entities of any country, it is necessary to invest in and develop managers with digital leadership.China has been involved in the so-called "digital zero-sum game" of some hegemonic competitors, in which digital mindset and digital economy interact with and promote each other and jointly breed the Makers.Makers play a role in the production and dissemination of social knowledge; therefore, there is an important value for the development of Chinese enterprises to apply the Maker mindset in the digital economy era to the micro-level of enterprise ecological construction.#br#In February 2018, Vodafone Group and Huawei announced that they had jointly completed the first 5G call test in the world.The advent of 5G has become the trigger for the United States to tighten its strategic blockade against Huawei.The United States, through a series of measures such as economic blockades, policy restrictions, judicial charges, technical pressure, and alliance boycotts, has made Huawei fall into the specific situation of the evolving digital game and competition of the "anti-globalization wave" dominated by the American market.However, Huawei did not get caught up in the "new arms race" as some countries expected.As a Maker, Ren Zhengfei takes a series of typical countermeasures to maintain the stable internal operation of Huawei.His digital mindset, combined with internal operating mechanism in Huawei company, has played an important role together.This ensures that Huawei can maintain the self-balance and good circulation of its internal operating ecosystem in some extreme situations, such as the hegemonic technology war initiated by the United States, the absence of senior leaders, and the failure of supply of core equipment.#br#Using the vertical single case study method, this study makes text analyses of about 531 000 words of interview records of Huawei's founder, Ren Zhengfei, interviewed by domestic and foreign media 44 times from 2019 to 2020.It first sorts out the challenges faced by Huawei in both internal and external environments from 2018 to 2020.On this basis, it further summarizes the main practical problems from Ren Zhengfei's Maker thinking; by using the procedural grounded theory method, the study summarizes Ren Zhengfei's digital mindset configuration and explores the reform of Huawei's internal operation ecosystem in a specific period promoted by his digital mindset.The results show that the digital mindset of Ren Zhengfei can be distilled into categories such as self-criticism, continuous learning and hard struggle.The digital mindset can be summarized into the SUCCESS digital leadership theory which refers to self-discipline, undertaking, cohesive force, caution, empathy, sagacity, and sharing.On this basis, Huawei has established an operation mechanism to effectively respond to threats and challenges from some countries, such as a self-correction system, a re-education and training system, and special employee promotion methods,and promoted the reform of internal operation ecosystem from four aspects: talent ecology, governance ecology, technology ecology and external coordination ecology.#br#This study not only enriches the original leadership theories and expands the application of integration theory in Chinese enterprises, but also provides beneficial enlightenment for Makers to deal with challenges in an uncertain environment.The enlightenment of this study is as follows: enterprises should strengthen independent research and innovation of digital technology; in order to discover and cultivate the digital mindset of Makers, business leaders should not copy the management concepts and practices of other excellent entrepreneurs, but be creative and coordinate the digital mindset of Makers with the enterprise's micro policies, mechanisms and systems, thereby promoting the self-balance and good circulation of the internal operation ecosystem of the enterprise.#br#

参考文献

[1] WESTERMAN G, BONNET D, MCAFEE A.Leading digital: turning technology into business transformation[M].Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press,2014.
[2] LIU C, WART M V, KIM S, et al.The effects of national cultures on two technologically advanced countries: the case of e-leadership inSouth Korea and the United States[J].Australian Journal of Public Administration,2020,79(3):298-329.
[3] ADNER R, KAPOOR P.Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations[J].Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(3):306-333.
[4] 李燕萍,苗力.企业数字领导力的结构维度及其影响——基于中国情境的扎根理论研究[J].武汉大学学报,2020,73(6):125-136.
[5] BARNARD C I.经理人员的职能[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2013.
[6] 郑晓明,郭一蓉,刘争光.危机领导力的理论模型构建:基于中国机长刘传健案例的质性研究[J].管理学报,2021,18(1):12-21.
[7] 郎艺,尹俊.中庸不利于创新吗?中庸领导行为对团队创新影响的理论建构[J].中国人力资源开发,2021,38(6):24-42.
[8] 沈莉,葛玉辉.正念领导力:作用机制与动态发展模型[J].商业经济与管理,2021,41(8):16-28.
[9] HERTEL G, STONE D L, JOHNSON R D, et al.The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of the internet at work[M].New Jersey:Wiley Blackwell,2017.
[10] AVOLIO B J.E-leadership: implications for theory, research and practice[J].Leadership Quarterly, 2000,11(4):615-668.
[11] ROMAN A V, WART M V, WANG X H, et al.Defining e-leadership as competence in ICT-mediated communications: an exploratory assessment[J].Public Administration Review,2019,79(6):853-866.
[12] BENITEZ J, ARENAS A, CASTILLO A, et al.Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: the role of platform digitization capability[J].Information & Management,2022, 59(2): 103590.
[13] HONEY M A, KANTER D E B.Design, make, play: growing the next generation of STEM innovators[M].New York: Routledge,2013:1-9.
[14] CHU S L, QUEK F, BHANGAONKAR S, et al.Making the maker: a means-to-an-ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children[J].International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction,2015,5:11-19.
[15] 李欢欢.创客思维与数字媒体支持的微课创作探究[J].现代教育技术,2016,26(9):120-126.
[16] MAGISTRETTI S, PHAM C T A, DELL'ERA C.Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2021, 97: 59-70.
[17] 许庆瑞,李杨,吴画斌.全面创新如何驱动组织平台化转型——基于海尔集团三大平台的案例分析[J].浙江大学学报,2019,49(6):78-91.
[18] ATHANASSIOS A, BRINIA V.Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship[J].Education Sciences,2019,9(2):113-113.
[19] OH D S, PHILLIPS F, PARK S, et al.Innovation ecosystems: a critical examination[J].Technovation,2016,54:1-6.
[20] LAWRENCE P R, LORSCH J W.Differentiation and integration in complex organizations[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12(1):1-47.
[21] MAURER I, EBERS M.Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications:lessons from biotechnology start-ups[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2006,51(2):262-292.
[22] GRIGORIOU K,ROTHAERMEL F T.Organizing for knowledge generation:internalknowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017,38(2):395-414.
[23] ZAHRA S, NAMBISAN S.Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems[J].AMS Review,2011,1(1):4-17.
[24] WEST J, WOOD D.Evolving an open ecosystem: The rise and fall of the Symbian platform[M]//Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014.
[25] PETTIGREW A M.The character and significance of strategy process research[J].Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(S2):5-16.
[26] HATCH M.The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers[M].New York: McGraw Hill Professional,2013.
[27] 陈武,陈建安,梁燕,等.社会网络视角下的创客资本研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(7):1-9.
[28] HAMBRICK D C.Upper echelons theory: an update[J].Academy of Management Review,2007,32(2):334-343.
[29] GEBAUER H, WORCH H, TRUFFER B.Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation[J].European Management Journal,2012,30(1):57-73.
文章导航

/