企业创新管理

数字化转型如何促进企业创新效率提升——来自金融资产配置视角的再审视

  • 宋加山 ,
  • 涂瀚匀 ,
  • 赵锐锃
展开
  • (1.西南科技大学 经济管理学院,四川 绵阳 621010;2.中国科学技术大学 管理学院,安徽 合肥 230026)
宋加山(1979—),男,四川内江人,博士,西南科技大学经济管理学院教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为企业管理;涂瀚匀(1998—),女,四川达州人,西南科技大学经济管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为企业管理;赵锐锃(1995—),男,四川绵竹人,中国科学技术大学管理学院博士研究生,西南科技大学经济管理学院助教,研究方向为环境经济、企业管理。本文通讯作者:赵锐锃。

收稿日期: 2023-03-09

  修回日期: 2023-05-01

  网络出版日期: 2024-07-25

基金资助

四川省农村电子商务应用能力普及培训项目(2021JDKP0062)

How Can Digital Transformation Prmote the Efficiency of Enterprise Innovation?A Re-Examination from the Perspective of Financial Asset Allocation

  • Song Jiashan ,
  • Tu Hanyun ,
  • Zhao Ruizeng
Expand
  • (1.School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010, China;2.School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

Received date: 2023-03-09

  Revised date: 2023-05-01

  Online published: 2024-07-25

摘要

以大数据、云计算、人工智能等为核心的数字技术可为创新发展提供新动能。企业作为微观创新主体,在我国创新驱动发展战略实施过程中占据主导地位,对我国经济高质量发展具有重要影响。基于金融资产配置视角,以2010—2021年A股上市企业为样本,构建企业数字化转型创新驱动框架,采用双向固定效应模型、有调节的中介效应模型以及门限效应模型进行一系列实证检验。结果表明:数字化转型能够显著提升企业创新效率;在企业数字化转型创新驱动机制中,融资约束发挥重要中介作用;金融化抑制数字化转型对企业创新效率的直接影响效应,正向调节融资约束在数字化转型创新驱动机制中的中介作用。通过探讨数字化转型对企业创新效率的驱动机制,为政府、金融机构和企业共同打造数字驱动创新生态提供实践启示。

本文引用格式

宋加山 , 涂瀚匀 , 赵锐锃 . 数字化转型如何促进企业创新效率提升——来自金融资产配置视角的再审视[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(14) : 62 -71 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023030240

Abstract

Enterprises are at the core of China's economic development since they represent the primary drivers of micro-innovation.Enhancing the innovation capabilities of enterprises is essential to promoting the strategy of strengthening the country with science and technology and empowering long-term sustainable economic development.As China's economy moves from high-speed growth to innovation-led, high-quality development, enterprises must achieve digital transformation to enhance innovation and development effectively.Therefore, it has become a crucial topic of discussion about how to embrace digital technology in stimulating innovation vitality and improving efficiency in the digital economy era.#br#While existing literature has recognized that digital transformation has positive effects on innovation, it has focused primarily on innovation quantity and quality without consideration of innovation efficiency.Digital transformation enables firms to upgrade their existing products and increase their innovation output.However, such upgrades have led to the filing of numerous duplicate, low-quality patents, lowering the overall quality of innovation.Thus, further exploration of the potential impact mechanisms between digital transformation and innovation efficiency is required.An imbalance in financial asset allocation may adversely affect digital transformation and innovation,but few studies have analyzed the behavioral effects of financial asset allocation on digital transformation and innovation, indicating the need for a systematic framework to clarify their impact mechanisms.#br#To further enrich the existing theoretical and empirical analysis framework, this study first clarifies the relationship between digital transformation and innovation efficiency.Next, the underlying mechanisms of financing constraints and corporate financialization are analyzed.The samples from the financial industry, insurance industry, and real estate industry are excluded, and 11 000 observation values were ultimately obtained after screening.This study employs the panel double fixed effect model, mediating model, moderated mediation model, and threshold effect model to analyze the direct effect and potential mechanism of the digital transformation of China's A-share listed companies on innovation efficiency from 2010 to 2021.#br#The following research conclusions are obtained.First, digital transformation can significantly enhance firms' innovation capability, and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests and endogeneity tests.Second, financing constraints play a significant mediating role in the path of digital transformation for enterprises, affecting innovation efficiency.The digital transformation of enterprises can break the information barriers and broaden the innovation financing channels, improving enterprises' innovation efficiency by alleviating their financing constraints.Third, among the direct effects of digital transformation-driven innovation, the increase in financial asset allocation by firms for capital arbitrage motives has a "crowding-out effect" on corporate innovation.Fourth, on the mediating path of financing constraints, enterprises can play the role of "reservoir" of financial assets by allocating financial assets based on the motivation of capital reserves.#br#The potential contributions of this paper are as follows.First, this study empirically tests the contribution of digital transformation to the efficiency of corporate innovation and enriches the empirical research on digital transformation and corporate innovation efficiency.Second, this study tests the transmission mechanism of financing constraints in the relationship between digital transformation and corporate innovation and provides new empirical evidence for firms to explore the path of digital transformation-driven innovation.Third, from the perspective of firms' allocation of financial assets, it re-examines the relationship between digital transformation and innovation efficiency and discovers that the financialization of firms has a moderating mechanism in the process of digital transformation-driven innovation as well as its boundary conditions.#br#Finally, this study puts forward some targeted suggestions based on the empirical results.Government departments should focus on creating a sound ecology of digital-driven innovation.Financial institutions should establish and improve the financial market system to provide financial support for enterprises' technological innovation.Entity enterprises need to accelerate digital transformation at the same time, and they should treat the allocation of financial assets in an objective and dialectical manner,and reasonably plan the investment of financial assets.#br#

参考文献

[1] 滕明明,申明浩.数字化同群效应如何影响企业创新投入——一个有调节的中介模型[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-9[2023-04-27].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.g3.20230310.1550.002.html.
[2] 王永霞,孙新波,张明超,等.数字化转型情境下组织韧性形成机理——基于数据赋能视角的单案例研究[J].技术经济,2022,41(5):97-108.
[3] 钱晶晶,何筠.传统企业动态能力构建与数字化转型的机理研究[J].中国软科学,2021,70(6):135-143.
[4] 涂心语,严晓玲.数字化转型、知识溢出与企业全要素生产率——来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2022,21(2):43-56.
[5] ZHAO X, SUN X, ZHAO L, et al.Can the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises promote enterprise innovation[J].Business Process Management Journal, 2022, 28(4): 960-982.
[6] BLOOM N, GARICANO L, SADUN R, et al.The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization[J].Management Science, 2014, 60(12): 2859-2885.
[7] 庞瑞芝,刘东阁.数字化与创新之悖论:数字化是否促进了企业创新——基于开放式创新理论的解释[J].南方经济,2022,40(9):97-117.
[8] MORETTI N, ELLUL C, CECCONI F R, et al.GeoBIM for built environment condition assessment supporting asset management decision making[J].Automation in Construction, 2021,130: 103859-103873.
[9] 肖土盛,吴雨珊,亓文韬.数字化的翅膀能否助力企业高质量发展——来自企业创新的经验证据[J].经济管理,2022,44(5):41-62.
[10] 段华友,杨兴柳,董峰.数字化转型、融资约束与企业创新[J].统计与决策,2023,39(5):164-168.
[11] 张陈宇,孙浦阳,谢娟娟.生产链位置是否影响创新模式选择——基于微观角度的理论与实证[J].管理世界,2020,36(1):45-59,233.
[12] 王春英,陈宏民.数字经济背景下企业数字化转型的问题研究[J].管理现代化,2021,41(2):29-31.
[13] 韩先锋,宋文飞,李勃昕.互联网能成为中国区域创新效率提升的新动能吗[J].中国工业经济,2019,376(7):119-136.
[14] SUMBAL M S, TSUI E, SEE-TO E W K.Interrelationship between big data and knowledge management: an exploratory study in the oil and gas sector[J].Journal of Knowledge Management, 2017, 21(1): 180-196.
[15] 张勋,万广华,张佳佳,等.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究,2019,54(8):71-86.
[16] MILANI S, NEUMANN R.R&D, patents, and financing constraints of the top global innovative firms[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2022, 2022(196): 546-567.
[17] BELADI H, DENG J, HU M.Cash flow uncertainty, financial constraints and R&D investment[J].International Review of Financial Analysis, 2021,76: 101785-101798.
[18] CHE Y, ZHANG L.Human capital, technology adoption and firm performance: impacts of China's higher education expansion in the late 1990s[J].The Economic Journal, 2018, 128(614): 2282-2320.
[19] 胡奕明,王雪婷,张瑾.金融资产配置动机:“蓄水池”或“替代”——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2017,52(1):181-194.
[20] OPLER T, PINKOWITZ L, STULZ R, et al.The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 1999,39(1): 3-46.
[21] 黎伟,许桂华,任晓怡.企业金融化与数字技术应用:促进还是抑制[J].经济体制改革,2021,39(6):142-147.
[22] 任晓怡,宁致远,吴非.企业金融化与数字化转型——基于上市企业年报数字化文本信息的识别与检验[J].经济与管理,2022,36(3):84-92.
[23] 王红建,曹瑜强,杨庆,等.实体企业金融化促进还是抑制了企业创新——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验研究[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(1):155-166.
[24] 刘莉亚,何彦林,王照飞,等.融资约束会影响中国企业对外直接投资吗——基于微观视角的理论和实证分析[J].金融研究,2015,43(8):124-140.
[25] FORS B, CAMISN C.Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size[J].Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(2): 831-848.
[26] 张建伟.融资方式对企业数字化转型类型的影响[J].财会月刊,2022,43(22):48-55.
[27] ALMEIDA H, CAMPELLO M, WEISBACH M S.The cash flow sensitivity of cash[J].The Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(4): 1777-1804.
[28] HADLOCK C J, PIERCE J R.New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index[J].The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(5): 1909-1940.
[29] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补[J].心理学报,2014,46(5):714-726.
[30] HANSEN B E.Sample splitting and threshold estimation[J].Econometrica, 2000, 68(3): 575-603.
[31] 张欣,董竹.数字化转型与企业技术创新——机制识别、保障条件分析与异质性检验[J].经济评论,2023,44(1):3-18.
[32] 张国胜,杜鹏飞.数字化转型对我国企业技术创新的影响:增量还是提质[J].经济管理,2022,44(6):82-96.
文章导航

/