China's manufacturing industry has gradually become deeply embedded in the global value chain and integrated into the global production network established by developed countries (or regions) and their transnational corporations, accompanied by a state of "low-end lock-in".This new economic paradigm of scientific and technological financial investment has a positive role in promoting technological innovation in the manufacturing industry, helping to crack the "low-end lock-in" of China's manufacturing industry in the global value chain, and upgrading the status of China's manufacturing industry in the global value chain.This paper integrates science and technology financial investment, technology transfer and manufacturing value chain upgrading within the same research framework, and delves into the role of the mechanism among the three.#br#This paper utilizes China's provincial panel data from 2011—2021 to measure the technological complexity of manufacturing exports to measure the position of manufacturing in the global value chain, and then empirically examines the impact of science and technology financial inputs on the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain from the perspective of technology transfer.The study finds that (1) science and technology financial inputs can promote the climbing of the global value chain of the manufacturing industry; (2) the promotion effect of S&T financial inputs on the upgrading of manufacturing global value chain shows regional and source heterogeneity, i.e., on the one hand, the promotion effect of S&T financial inputs on the upgrading of manufacturing value chain in the eastern region is more significant; on the other hand, S&T financial inputs originated from the venture capital, science and technology capital market, and the enterprises themselves have a more significant role in the promotion of manufacturing value chain upgrading; (3) the mediating effect test confirms that technology transfer plays a partly mediating role in the process of promoting the upgrading of manufacturing value chain by S&T financial inputs, and the in-depth analysis further verifies that science and technology financial inputs from the capital market and enterprises themselves can play a role in promoting the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain with the mediating effect of technology transfer in the whole life cycle of manufacturing enterprises; (4) the threshold effect test verifies that with technology transfer as the threshold variable, the promotion effect of science and technology financial investment on the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain has a non-linear characteristic, and only when the level of technology transfer crosses a specific threshold value, science and technology financial investment will promote the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain.#br#The analysis suggests that it is necessary to improve the science and technology investment and financing system and promote the development of science and technology finance; meanwhile, it is important to improve the level of technology transfer in China and strengthen the promotion mechanism of science and technology finance for the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain.In this case, a technology transfer platform and network are warranted to promote the efficient flow of technology and innovation resources.#br#The novelties and theoretical contributions of this study are listed.Firstly, it innovatively puts science and technology financial input, technology transfer and the upgrading of manufacturing value chain under the same research framework to analyze the role mechanism of science and technology financial input on the upgrading of manufacturing value chain from the perspective of technology transfer, and provides a new breakthrough for China's manufacturing industry to crack the "low-end lock-in" dilemma and climb up the global value chain.Secondly, the study analyzes the impact of different sources of science and technology financial inputs on the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain at various stages of the enterprise life cycle, as well as the role played by technology transfer, which provides relatively robust and comprehensive empirical evidence for giving full play to the role of science and technology financial inputs in the promotion of the upgrading of the manufacturing value chain.Finally, after testing the mechanism of science and technology financial inputs on the value chain of the manufacturing industry, this paper also establishes a threshold model to explore the non-linear effects.#br#
[1] WANG S, HE Y, SONG M.Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: inequality towards developing countries[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 277: 110999.
[2] YANG B, LIU B, PENG J, et al.The impact of the embedded global value chain position on energy-biased technology progress:evidence from chinas manufacturing[J].Technology in Society, 2022, 71: 102065.
[3] ZHOU Y, ZHUO C, DENG F.Can the rise of the manufacturing value chain be the driving force of energy conservation and emission reduction in China [J].Energy Policy, 2021, 156: 112408.
[4] HE Y, XIE C.Measurement, decomposition and emission reduction effects of digital global value chains[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 378: 134307.
[5] ZHOU W C, YAN D, SUN S L.Climbing the ladder:inward sourcing as an upgrading capability in global value chains[J].Research Policy, 2022, 51(3): 104439.
[6] WANG S, WANG X, CHEN S.Global value chains and carbon emission reduction in developing countries: does industrial upgrading matter [J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2022, 97: 106895.
[7] PRIMI A, TOSELLI M.A global perspective on industry 4.0 and development: new gaps or opportunities to leapfrog [J].Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 2020, 23(4): 371-389.
[8] XU Y, DONG B, CHEN Y, et al.Effect of industrial transfer on carbon lock-in: a spatial econometric analysis of Chinese cities[J].Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2022, 65(6): 1024-1055.
[9] 李玉山, 陆远权, 王拓.金融支持与技术创新如何影响出口复杂度——基于中国高技术产业的经验研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(8):43-57.
[10] 卢福财, 金环.互联网是否促进了制造业产品升级——基于技术复杂度的分析[J].财贸经济, 2020, 41(5):99-115.
[11] ZHOU G, ZHU J, LUO S.The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China:mediating effect of green finance[J].Ecological Economics, 2022, 193: 107308.
[12] LI H, LUO F, HAO J, et al.How does fintech affect energy transition: evidence from Chinese industrial firms[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023, 102: 107181.
[13] XIAOLI T, GANG K O U, ZHANG W.Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: evidence from Chinese enterprises[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 158: 120155.
[14] 戴魁早.技术市场发展对出口技术复杂度的影响及其作用机制[J].中国工业经济, 2018,35(7):117-135.
[15] ROSSI M, FESTA G, DEVALLE A, et al.When corporations get disruptive, the disruptive get corporate:financing disruptive technologies through corporate venture capital[J].Journal of Business Research, 2020, 118: 378-388.
[16] 孙哲远.数字金融、中小企业发展与制造业全球价值链攀升[J].企业经济, 2022, 41(9):15-26.
[17] 徐兰, 吴超林.数字经济赋能制造业价值链攀升:影响机理、现实因素与靶向路径[J].经济学家, 2022,34(7):76-86.
[18] 王浩, 贺颖, 杜玉爽.科技金融政策对技术转移网络协作关系的影响[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022,23(3):92-97.
[19] 董思睿.科技金融投入对技术转移的影响分析[D].兰州:兰州财经大学, 2022.
[20] 崔学海, 王崇举, 曾波.基于DEA-Tobit的长江经济带技术转移金融支持效率研究[J].统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(9):77-84.
[21] 徐研, 杨珅睿, 焦继军.风险投资网络联结与企业技术转移[J].经济经纬, 2022, 39(5):99-109.
[22] CIVERA A, MEOLI M, VISMARA S.Engagement of academics in university technology transfer: opportunity and necessity academic entrepreneurship[J].European Economic Review, 2020, 123: 103376.
[23] DURAND C, MILBERG W.Intellectual monopoly in global value chains[J].Review of International Political Economy, 2020, 27(2): 404-429.
[24] SWINNEN J, KUIJPERS R.Value chain innovations for technology transfer in developing and emerging economies: conceptual issues, typology, and policy implications[J].Food Policy, 2019, 83: 298-309.
[25] 杜传忠, 王梦晨.技能偏向型技术进步对中国制造业价值链攀升的影响研究——基于知识产权保护的视角[J].经济科学, 2021,43(1):31-43.
[26] 韩军辉, 闫姗娜.绿色技术创新能力对制造业价值链攀升的影响[J].科技管理研究, 2018, 38(24):177-182.
[27] 陈启斐, 刘志彪.反向服务外包对我国制造业价值链提升的实证分析[J].经济学家, 2013,25(11):68-75.
[28] HAUSMANN R, HWANG J, RODRIK D.What you export matters[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2007, 12(1):1-25.
[29] 王永进, 盛丹, 施炳展, 等.基础设施如何提升了出口技术复杂度[J].经济研究, 2010, 45(7):103-115.
[30] 蔡跃洲.科技成果转化的内涵边界与统计测度[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(1):37-44.
[31] 张汝飞, 刘超, 赵彦云.技术市场对产业结构调整的促进效应——以北京技术市场为例[J].技术经济, 2016, 35(8):74-82.
[32] 邱斌, 叶龙凤, 孙少勤.参与全球生产网络对我国制造业价值链提升影响的实证研究——基于出口复杂度的分析[J].中国工业经济, 2012,29(1):57-67.
[33] 李福柱, 曹友斌, 李昆泽.中国制造业出口技术复杂度的区域差异及收敛性研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(4):107-126.