链主企业对于推动产业创新发展、产业链资源整合、产业链企业协同发展发挥至关重要的作用,具有强大的生态主导力。运用扎根理论方法进行探索式研究,从技术创新引领力、产业协作整合力、产业发展领导力3个方面构建链主企业生态主导力评价指标体系,开发相应测度量表。基于评价指标间存在的相关关系和反馈关系,运用决策试行与评价实验室(DEMATEL)以及网络分析法(ANP)构建评价模型,确定定量化指标权重参考范围,旨在为链主企业生态主导力评价和培育提供理论指导和实践指引。据此,提出完善“链主”企业培育与服务机制、持续提升产业链高质量发展的政策建议。
Entering the chain era, market competition has expanded from individual enterprises to the industrial chain. The system of leading-chain enterprises has been implemented across China to select enterprises with strong innovation capability. Leading-chain enterprises play a vital role in promoting industrial innovation and development, integrating industrial chain resources, and driving the coordinated development of industrial chain enterprises, and they present strong ecological dominance which refers to the influence, control and leading power of an enterprise in its industrial ecology. The 14th Five-Year Plan has emphasized the necessity to build leading-chain enterprises with ecological dominance and core competitiveness, and give full play to their role models in the industrial and supply chains. In order to give full play to the leading role of leading-chain enterprises, it is essential to make an accurate evaluation of the ecological dominance of leading-chain enterprises first. However, at present, compared with the strategic requirements of the state on upgrading the modernization level of the industrial chain through the main working mechanism of the industrial chain, and the practical exploration of enterprises to promote the coordination of the industrial chain, the evaluation research on the ecological dominance of leading-chain enterprises is still relatively lagging behind. Therefore, this paper selects the main enterprises of the high-end equipment manufacturing industry chain and the aluminum magnesium deep-processing industry chain and their related enterprises in Shanxi province as the research objects, carries out exploratory research by the grounded theory method, and extracts the evaluation index system of the ecological dominance of the main enterprises through coding from three aspects: leading ability in technological innovation, ability in industrial cooperation and integration, and ability to lead industry development. Meanwhile, the corresponding measurement scale is developed to provide theoretical and practical guidance for the evaluation and cultivation of the ecological dominance of the leading-chain enterprises and to explore methods for provinces and cities to select and evaluate leading-chain enterprises.#br# The DEMATEL-ANP evaluation model is established based on the correlation and feedback relationship between evaluation indicators to determine the reference range of quantitative weights of the index system. DEMATEL is used to determine the correlation between indicators, and ANP is used to measure the weight of indicators. The measurement results show that from the perspective of industrial chain collaboration, the weight of leading ability in technological innovation is the largest and the importance is higher, followed by ability to lead industry development, and the weight of ability in industrial cooperation and integration is the least. In order to verify the scientificity and feasibility of the ecological dominance evaluation index system, this paper also selects member enterprises in the key industrial chain of Shanxi province to evaluate ecological dominance. The evaluation results are generally in line with the subjective evaluation of the main enterprises in the industrial chain,indicating that the primacy of the main enterprises is not obvious.#br# This paper draws the conclusions that , firstly, a weight system for quantitative identification and evaluation of leading-chain-enterprises is established based on the leading ability in technological innovation, ability in industrial cooperation and integration, and ability to lead industry development; secondly quantitative evaluation of the ecological dominance of leading-chain-enterprises is helpful to identify the potential of the enterprises, carry out early cultivation and evaluate the effect of the dominance; thirdly, the efforts to promote the cooperation mechanism between leading-chain-enterprises and core enterprises and the development of chain cluster ecology should be emphasized in the evaluation orientation of ecological dominance of leading-chain-enterprises. Then, this paper puts forward targeted policy suggestions to improve the cultivation and service mechanisms of leading-chain enterprises. First, it is critical to establish a selection and identification standard system that combines qualitative and quantitative evaluation based on the industry characteristics and ecological dominant status of chain owners. Second, there is an urgent need to strengthen the top-level design of supporting the construction of industrial innovation consortia, build a policy system that is conducive to the deep integration of innovation chains and industrial chains, and guide innovation resources to meet strategic innovation needs.#br#
[1] 林淑君,倪红福.中国式产业链链长制:理论内涵与实践意义[J].云南社会科学,2022,42(4):90-101.
[2] 吴明华.“链时代”到来[J].决策,2020,28(12):12-15.
[3] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,曲永义.产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J].中国工业经济,2022,40(7):5-24.
[4] 郑茜,王臻,蒋玉涛.产业链“链长制”的理论内涵与实施路径——基于扎根理论的多案例实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(23):209-215.
[5] 叶振宇,庄宗武.产业链龙头企业与本地制造业企业成长:动力还是阻力[J].中国工业经济,2022,40(7):141-158.
[6] 戴翔,林益安.全球生产网络下产业领导力影响了知识溢出吗[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(4):124-133.
[7] 齐平,宋威辉.链主企业对中国制造业产业链高质量发展的影响[J].南方经济,2023,41(5):84-106.
[8] 于苏,于小悦,王竹泉.“链主”企业的供应链治理与链上企业全要素生产率[J].经济管理,2023,45(4):22-40.
[9] 白全民,张茹莹,王东旭,等.基于扎根理论的企业核心技术创新能力评价研究[J].创新科技,2023,23(4):61-71.
[10] 王影,张宏如,苏涛永.核心企业主导的智能制造创新生态系统知识治理:基于扎根理论[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(3):133-141.
[11] 刘家国,刘巍,刘潇琦,等.基于扎根理论方法的中俄跨境电子商务发展研究[J].中国软科学,2015,30(9):27-40.
[12] 许庆瑞,吴志岩,陈力田.转型经济中企业自主创新能力演化路径及驱动因素分析——海尔集团1984~2013年的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2013(4):121- 134,188.
[13] 边伟军,密淑泉,罗公利,等.创新生态系统核心企业主导能力测度研究——基于扎根理论的探索[J].青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(1):24-30.
[14] 赵龙文,黄锐敏,方俊.基于扎根理论的政府开放数据价值实现能力评价研究[J].情报杂志,2023,42(11):183-191.
[15] 陈英武,俞晓峰.产业链“链主”企业生态主导力提升路径研究——以江苏为例[J].经济研究参考,2022,44(11):59-68.
[16] 张文妍,段玲玲.浙江省农业绿色发展的驱动因子识别与绩效评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(6):24-33.
[17] 孙晶. 复杂系统DEMATEL阈值确定方法研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2019.
[18] 杨保安,张科静.多目标决策分析理论、方法与应用研究[M].上海:东华大学出版社,2008.
[19] 马鸿佳,王亚婧,苏中锋.数字化转型背景下中小制造企业如何编排资源利用数字机会——基于资源编排理论的fsQCA研究[J/OL].南开管理评论:1-18 [2023-08-07].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20221001.1540.006.html.