综述

军民融合创新联合体:内涵、逻辑与进路

  • 尹西明 ,
  • 陈泰伦 ,
  • 陈劲
展开
  • (1.北京理工大学 管理与经济学院,北京 100081;2.北京市哲学社会科学融合发展研究基地,北京 100081;3.浙江大学 管理学院,浙江 杭州 310058;4.清华大学 经济管理学院,北京 100084)
尹西明(1991—),男,河南平顶山人,博士,北京理工大学管理与经济学院特别副研究员,北京市哲学社会科学融合发展研究基地副主任、硕士生导师,研究方向为创新管理与数字经济;陈泰伦(2001—),男,北京人,浙江大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新管理与数字经济;陈劲(1968—),男,浙江余姚人,博士,清华大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师,教育部“长江学者”特聘教授,研究方向为创新管理与科技政策。本文通讯作者:陈泰伦。

收稿日期: 2022-10-17

  修回日期: 2023-01-29

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(72104027);北京市社科基金决策咨询项目(22JCC074);国家自然科学基金重点项目(72232004);中国工程院重大战略咨询研究课题(2022-JB-01)

Military-civil Fusion Innovation Consortium: Connotation, Logic and Approaches

  • Yin Ximing ,
  • Chen Tailun ,
  • Chen Jin
Expand
  • (1.School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;2.Research Center for Integrative Innovation, Beijing 100081, China;3.School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;4.School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Received date: 2022-10-17

  Revised date: 2023-01-29

  Online published: 2024-02-26

摘要

军民融合是协同推进国防事业与经济建设的重要抓手,也是巩固提升一体化国家战略体系和能力的核心议题。面对新一轮科技革命与产业变革的加速演进,科技创新成为强化科技安全、保障经济安全和国防安全的关键纽带。针对我国军民融合协同创新面临的新挑战与新使命,基于使命驱动型创新和整合式创新理论,提出面向高水平科技自立自强的军民融合创新联合体。系统解析军民融合创新联合体概念内涵、理论基础和典型特征,构建军民融合创新联合体基本架构,探讨强化军民国家战略科技力量体系化协同和整合式创新,积聚力量进行原创性引领性攻关,加快关键核心技术攻坚和场景化应用,以科技安全支撑经济、国防和新型国家安全的过程逻辑。提出以军民融合创新联合体为抓手,健全国家安全体系,以新安全格局保障新发展格局的路径与对策。

本文引用格式

尹西明 , 陈泰伦 , 陈劲 . 军民融合创新联合体:内涵、逻辑与进路[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(4) : 151 -160 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022100418

Abstract

Military-civil fusion is a vital grip to promote national defense strength and economic development synergistically, as well as a core issue to consolidate and enhance the holistic national strategic system and capability.China's military-civil fusion development has entered a senior stage, reflecting the trend of intelligent warfare patterns and the generalization of military and civilian technologies.The need to further strengthen the capability of the national defense S&T industry is highly stressed by the government.Therefore, this study proposes to build a military-civil fusion innovation consortium (MCF-IC) with the goal of S&T self-reliance and self-improvement as well as a national S&T security mission so as to complete and improve the construction of the military-civil fusion innovation system.#br#There are some critical challenges in China's military-civil fusion collaborative innovation.First, there is a severe separation between the military and the regional innovation systems.Information barriers hinder the connection between military and civilian innovation subjects.Second, the institutional cost for private enterprises to participate in military-civil fusion collaborative innovation is high, and they must go through a long process of stringent qualification review.Meanwhile, relevant research institutes and laboratories lack sufficient attention to technology commercialization, obstructing the application and industrialization of frontier technologies.Finally, there is a more pronounced lack of willingness among enterprises in the military industry to actively collaborate with private enterprises on technology commercialization.The lack of an adequate context as a carrier to bring together innovation subjects impedes defense innovation development.#br#The MCF-IC is a new organizational model that can solve the above problems in the current military-civil fusion collaborative innovation practice.With the mission of strengthening S&T security to guarantee national and economic security, it is based on mission-oriented innovation and holistic innovation theory, and led by the strategy of building a modern, powerful socialist country.It is supported by a new national innovation ecosystem and efficiently coordinated by multiple innovation subjects from industry, academia and research.It is a typical high-level innovation consortium formed with organized R&D.#br#Unlike the existing military-civil fusion collaborative innovation, the MCF-IC responds to two important strategic needs in the new development stage: the construction of an innovation powerhouse and the bottom-line requirements for secure development.It addresses a series of problems faced by the current military-civil fusion collaborative innovation.In terms of the theoretical foundation, it has been changed from the theory of collaborative innovation to mission-oriented innovation and holistic innovation which are aimed at solving the existing information barriers and collaborative obstacles.The major issues in focus have been converted from traditional national security to new national security, responding to the needs of the era and the strategic connotation of the senior stage for military-civil fusion.In terms of the relationship characteristics of innovation subjects, they bave been shifted from a loosely coupled model to a tightly coupled and co-evolution model with context-driven as the core, which enhances the integration level of innovation capability.As for the driving mechanism, it has been turned from the profit-oriented market mode to the mode of organized R&D, which solves the problem of dynamism and improves the efficiency of S&T innovation output.On the structure, the MCF-IC has the systemic structural characteristics of an innovation ecosystem.Specifically, a typical MCf-IC includes an original innovation supply system composed of national laboratories, high-level research universities and national research institutions, an ecological system for MCF technology commercialization by the integration of leading S&T enterprises and hidden champions, and a regional innovation center or MCF innovation demonstration zone that brings together innovation resources.#br#Operationally, this study breaks the dichotomy between the military and civilian sectors and transforms national strategic needs into specific contexts and goals for innovation.By integrating innovation subjects and strategic resources in both military and civil fields, the MCF-IC drives the breakthroughs in basic research in frontier fields and develops strategic industries.It takes S&T security as the core, safeguards national defense security, economic security and other security, accelerates the modernization of the national security system and capability, and guarantees the new development pattern with a new security pattern.#br#

参考文献

[1] 黄毓森,纪建强,郭勤.中国特色先进国防科技工业体系内涵与实现路径[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(15): 137-145.
[2] 张于喆.推动军民融合战略实施:问题与建议[J].宏观经济研究,2018,40(10): 67-73,153.
[3] KULVE H Te,SMIT W A.Civilian-military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies[J].Research Policy,2003,32(6): 955-970.
[4] QI N,SHIPING L,JING H.An evolutionary game simulation of a composite subsidy policy to promote military-civilian integration: a national system of innovation with Chinese Characteristics[J].IEEE Access,2022,10: 88276-88294.
[5] 孙雷霆,李春发.军民融合时代特征、制约问题与治理路径[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(8): 134-143.
[6] 陈劲,阳镇,尹西明.双循环新发展格局下的中国科技创新战略[J].当代经济科学,2021,43(1): 1-9.
[7] 方正起,黄达.基于资源调控理论的军民科技协同创新平台建设研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(10): 124-129.
[8] 张纪海,周雪亮,樊伟.集成动员理论下军民科技协同创新机制设计研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(13): 120-126.
[9] 孙磊华,何海燕,常晓涵,等.军民深度协同对企业关键核心技术突破的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(23): 1-12.
[10] 赵黎明,孙健慧,张海波.基于微分博弈的军民融合协同创新体系技术共享行为研究[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(3): 183-191.
[11] 彭本红,王雪娇.网络嵌入、架构创新与军民融合协同创新绩效[J].科研管理,2021,42(7): 116-125.
[12] 许可,何丽敏,刘海波.生产者视角下军民融合技术成果转化关键问题研究——基于知识网络案例分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(6): 21-28.
[13] 吴晓波,张馨月,沈华杰.商业模式创新视角下我国半导体产业“突围”之路[J].管理世界,2021,37(3): 123-136,9.
[14] 尹西明,陈劲,贾宝余.高水平科技自立自强视角下国家战略科技力量的突出特征与强化路径[J].中国科技论坛,2021,37(9): 1-9.
[15] 尹西明,陈泰伦,陈劲,等.面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,51(2): 51-60.
[16] ROBINSON D K R,MAZZUCATO M.The evolution of mission-oriented policies: exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector[J].Research Policy,2019,48(4): 936-948.
[17] DELEIDI M,MAZZUCATO M.Directed innovation policies and the supermultiplier: an empirical assessment of mission-oriented policies in the US economy[J].Research Policy,2021,50(2): 104151.
[18] 陈劲,尹西明,梅亮.整合式创新:基于东方智慧的新兴创新范式[J].技术经济,2017,36(12): 1-10,29.
[19] EDQUIST C.Towards a holistic innovation policy:can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model[J].Research Policy,2019,48(4):869-879.
[20] ZENG W,YU M,ZHANG D,et al.Holistic innovation,market structure,and performance—research on a computer decision-making method[J].IEEE Access,2020,8: 180444-180457.
[21] CHEN J,YIN X,FU X,et al.Beyond catch-up: could China become the global innovation powerhouse? China′s innovation progress and challenges from a holistic innovation perspective[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2021,30(4): 1037-1064.
[22] XU J,ZHANG S.An evaluation study of the capabilities of civilian manufacturing enterprises entering the military products market under the background of China′s civil-military integration[J].Sustainability,2020,12(6): 2416.
[23] 李翔龙,王庆金,黄帅.军民融合企业技术创新生态系统协同机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2021(12): 133-143.
[24] CURRALL S C,FRAUENHEIM E,PERRY S J,et al.有组织的创新: 美国繁荣复兴之蓝图[M].陈劲,尹西明,译.1 版.北京:清华大学出版社,2017.
[25] 万劲波,张凤,潘教峰.开展“有组织的基础研究”:任务布局与战略科技力量[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(12): 1404-1412.
[26] 何海燕,单捷飞,李宏宽.军民融合背景下高校新型军事科技人才培养机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(19): 109-115.
[27] 倪春乐,王瑶,汤骁钰,等.总体国家安全观视阈下的“安全发展”[J].情报杂志,2022,41(2): 57-64,145.
[28] MITTAL V,DAVIDSON A.Combining wargaming with modeling and simulation to project future military technology requirements[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2021,68(4): 1195-1207.
[29] MITTAL V,CADDELL J.Adapting a military system for other markets early in the development lifecycle[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2021: 1-14.
文章导航

/