评价与预见

企业内外资金持有量对研发补贴激励作用的门槛效应——来自民营科技企业的数据分析

  • 尚洪涛 ,
  • 胡莹颖 ,
  • 王士晓
展开
  • (1.北京工业大学 经济与管理学院,北京 100124;2.北京市通州区漷县人民政府 经管站,北京101100)
尚洪涛(1967—),女,吉林长春人,博士,北京工业大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为财税政策、企业创新与绩效评价;胡莹颖(1998—),女,河南南阳人,北京工业大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为财税政策与企业创新;王士晓(1994—),女,河南南阳人,北京市通州区漷县人民政府经管站中级会计师,研究方向为财税政策与企业创新。

收稿日期: 2022-08-23

  修回日期: 2022-11-06

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-26

基金资助

国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BJY040)

Threshold Effect of Internal and External Capital Holding on R&D Subsidy Incentive Effect: An Empirical Analysis of Private Technology Enterprises

  • Shang Hongtao ,
  • Hu Yingying ,
  • Wang Shixiao
Expand
  • (1.College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;2.Economic and Management Station, Huo County People's Government, Tongzhou District, Beijing 101100, China)

Received date: 2022-08-23

  Revised date: 2022-11-06

  Online published: 2024-02-26

摘要

以2010—2020年402家民营科技企业数据为研究样本,实证分析企业内外资金持有量对政府研发补贴激励效果的影响,进而追本溯源地剖析影响中国民营科技企业研发补贴激励效果的根本原因。结果显示:企业内外资金持有量对研发补贴的激励效果具有双重门槛效应。一方面,内部资金过多或过少均不利于研发补贴发挥激励作用,当企业内部资金水平过高时,研发补贴对企业研发投入的促进作用最弱;另一方面,外部贷款较少的企业,研发补贴激励作用最显著,随着外部贷款水平提高,研发补贴的激励作用逐渐下降,直至不再显著。

本文引用格式

尚洪涛 , 胡莹颖 , 王士晓 . 企业内外资金持有量对研发补贴激励作用的门槛效应——来自民营科技企业的数据分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(4) : 90 -99 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022080640

Abstract

Innovation is of strategic importance to promote new changes in the mode of production, tap new drivers of economic growth, and promote high-quality economic development.As the most active economic entity in the national innovation system, private science and technology enterprises are the main force to promote China's innovation-driven development strategy and the strategic adjustment of economic structure.Innovation is the source of power for the development of private science and technology enterprises, but the innovation activity cycle is long with high cost and risk with the need for a large number of continuous research and development capital investment, while most of the private science and technology enterprises are small and medium-sized enterprises with a relative lack of capital.Therefore, the funding problem has become a long-term obstacle to the development of Chinese private technology enterprises innovation, transformation and upgrading shackles.In order to encourage private science and technology enterprises to improve their innovation capability and competitive advantage by increasing R&D investment, the Chinese government has continuously increased financial support in recent years.However, although the government's R&D subsidies continue to increase, the R&D investment of private technology enterprises has not increased significantly, and the incentive effect of subsidies is not ideal.Therefore, how to improve the incentive effect of government R&D subsidy policy and promote the technological innovation of private technology enterprises has important theoretical significance and practical value for promoting the development strategy of an innovation-oriented country.#br#This paper takes the panel data of 402 private science and technology enterprises from 2010 to 2020 as the research sample,and the internal funds and external loans as the threshold variables.It then establishes the threshold regression model to analyze the influence of different internal and external capital holding on the incentive effect of government R&D subsidies.#br#The results show that,firstly, both the internal funds and external loan holding of enterprises have a double threshold effect on the incentive effect of government R&D subsidies.Second, when the enterprise internal capital holding are at the medium level, the incentive effect of government R&D subsidies on enterprise innovation investment is the strongest;When the enterprise's internal cash holdings are at a low level, the R&D subsidies decline.When the enterprise's internal capital holdings are at the highest level, the incentive effect of R&D subsidies is the weakest.Thirdly, when the external loan level of enterprises is low, the government R&D subsidies have the greatest promoting effect on the innovation input of enterprises.With the increase in the external loan level of enterprises, the incentive effect of R&D subsidies will gradually decline.#br#Considering the internal and external capital allocation situation of China's private technology enterprises, this paper studies the influence of different levels of internal and external capital holding on the utilization of R&D subsidies to fundamentally analyze the reasons for the differential incentive effect of government R&D subsidies among different enterprises, so as to improve the incentive effect of government R&D subsidies.Compared with previous similar studies, the possible innovations in this paper are reflected in three aspects.Firstly, on the basis of different situations of internal and external capital allocation among private science and technology enterprises, this paper deeply analyzes the fundamental reasons why R&D subsidies have different incentive effects on the innovation of different private science and technology enterprises, and updates the research perspective of government R&D subsidies.Secondly, the threshold effect model is used to empirically analyze the reasonable range of the innovation incentive effect of government R&D subsidies on enterprises with different levels of internal and external capital holdings, and it provides a more accurate policy direction for the top-level design of R&D subsidies.In addition, hand-screening of R&D subsidies closely related to the innovation of private science and technology enterprises, excluding non-R&D subsidies, has improved the scientific nature and reliability of the research process and conclusions.#br#

参考文献

[1] NOLAHEWITT-DUNDAS,STEPHEN ROPER.Output additionality of public support for innovation: evidence for irish manufacturing plants[J].European Planning Studies,2010,18(1) : 107-122.
[2] 王德祥,李昕.政府补贴、政治关联与企业创新投入[J].财政研究,2017,38(8):79-89.
[3] PHILIPPBOEING.The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies——evidence from listed firms[J].Research Policy,2016,45(9) : 1774-1789.
[4] FERNANDA BROLLO.The political resource curse[J].The American Economic Review,2013,103(5) : 1759-1796.
[5] CZARNITZKI D,TOOLE A.Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2007,31(3): 169-181.
[6] 杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,2015,31(1):75-86,98,188.
[7] 马永强,阳丹,巩亚林.经济周期、政府扶持与企业创新[J].会计研究,2022,43(5):49-64.
[8] LACH S.Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? evidence from Israel[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,2002,50(4): 369-390.
[9] 曹平,王桂军.选择性产业政策、企业创新与创新生存时间——来自中国工业企业数据的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2018,17(4):26-39.
[10] 戴静,刘贯春,张建华.债务期限结构、政府补贴援助与企业技术升级[J].国际金融研究,2021,37(11):33-42.
[11] 于建忠,陈燕红.政府补贴对企业研发投入的门槛效应——基于融资约束差异的视角[J].浙江社会科学,2021,37(10):12-22,155.
[12] 郑飞,石青梅,李腾,等.财政补贴促进了企业创新吗——基于产业生命周期的经验证据[J].宏观经济研究,2021,67(2):41-52,161.
[13] 刘斌斌,左勇华.金融错配影响技术创新的政府补贴效应分析——基于企业控股权性质差异视角[J].科研管理,2022,43(1):61-69.
[14] 喻贞,胡婷,沈红波.地方政府的财政补贴:激励创新抑或政策性负担[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2020,62(6):145-153.
[15] 尚洪涛,王士晓.创新补贴,企业技术产出与价值实现[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(23):108-114.
[16] MEULEMAN M,DE MAESENEIRE W.Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs' access to external financing[J].Research Policy,2012,41(3): 580-591.
[17] 詹宇波,孙鑫,曾军辉.信贷约束、盈利能力与创新决策——来自中国高科技企业的面板证据[J].上海经济研究,2018,35(11):11.
[18] FELDMAN M P,KELLEY M R.The exante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy,economic incentives and private firm behavior[J].Research policy,2006,35(10): 1509-1521.
[19] 王刚刚,谢富纪,贾友.R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视——基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(2):60-78.
[20] MYERS S C.Capital structure puzzle[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,1984,39(3):575-592.
[21] BROWN J R,MARTINSSON G,PETERSEN B C.Do financing constraints matter for R&D[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2012,56(8):1512-1629.
[22] 常媛,曾永鹏,黄顺春.现金持有、研发投入与企业高质量发展——基于中介效应与面板门槛模型分析[J].华东经济管理,2022,36(6):58-67.
[23] 唐清泉,肖海莲.融资约束与企业创新投资—现金流敏感性——基于企业R&D异质性视角[J].南方经济,2012,30(11):40-54.
[24] CHEN V Z,LI J,SHAPIRO D M,et al.Ownership structure and innovation: an emerging market perspective[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2014,31(1): 1-24.
[25] 毕晓方,翟淑萍,姜宝强.政府补贴、财务冗余对高新技术企业双元创新的影响[J].会计研究,2017,38(1):46-52.
[26] 吴松彬,张凯,黄惠丹.R&D税收激励与中国高新制造企业创新的非线性关系研究——基于企业规模、市场竞争程度的调节效应分析[J].现代经济探讨,2018,37(12):61-69.
[27] 李平,王春晖.政府科技资助对企业技术创新的非线性研究——基于中国2001—2008年省级面板数据的门槛回归分析[J].中国软科学,2010,25(8):138-147.
[28] 李万福,杜静,张怀.创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资——来自中国上市公司的新证据[J].金融研究,2017,60(10):134-149.
[29] JENSEN M C.Agency costs of free cash flow,corporate finance,and takeovers[J].The American Economic Review,1986,76(2): 323-329.
[30] 常蕊,韩宝山.超额现金如何影响企业研发投入——基于企业异质性和影响机制的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2022,43(4):126-144.
[31] HOTTENROTT H,PETERS B.Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation: more money,more innovation[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,2012,94(4): 1126-1142.
[32] 解维敏,方红星.金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入[J].金融研究,2011,54(5):171-183.
[33] 张璇,刘贝贝,汪婷,等.信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J].经济研究,2017,52(5):161-174.
[34] 韩剑,严兵.中国企业为什么缺乏创造性破坏——基于融资约束的解释[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(4):124-132.
[35] AYYAGARI M, DEMIRGü?-KUNT A, MAKSIMOVIC V.Firm innovation in emerging markets: the role of finance,governance,and competition[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2011,46(6): 1545-1580.
[36] 李汇东,唐跃军,左晶晶.用自己的钱还是用别人的钱创新——基于中国上市公司融资结构与公司创新的研究[J].金融研究,2013,56(2):170-183.
[37] BERZKALNE I,ZELGALVE E.Capital structure and innovation:a study of baltic listed companies[J].Changes in Social and Business Environment,2013(5):13-21.
[38] CHEN J,HENG C S,TAN B C Y,et al.The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China[J].Research Policy,2018,47(1): 108-120.
[39] BRUCE E HANSEN.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation,testing,and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2): 345-368.
文章导航

/