随着新一代信息技术逐渐成为产业结构转型的重要推动力量，我国提出构建融通创新模式促进经济高质量发展。基于以上背景，从“融合”“畅通”两个视角剖析融通创新概念与内涵，运用fsQCA方法分析数字经济渗透效应、映射效应、规模效应影响城市融通创新水平的条件组态及实现路径。结果发现：高融通创新水平形成具有6条驱动路径，可划分为3种效应模式，其中，映射效应对6条驱动路径起重要辅助作用；提升城市融通创新水平是一个多因素协同作用的结果，不同因素组合通过殊途同归方式促进城市融通创新水平提升；相较于“涓滴型”城市，“策源型”城市在提高融通创新水平中其资源要素来源更加多样化，要素关联程度更高。

With the rapid development of information technology and digital economy, China is endeavoring to establish an innovative integration model to support high-quality economic development. Thus the deep integration of scientific and technological innovation and digital economy will be the fulcrum for shaping a new innovation paradigm. Furthermore with the rapid rise of the platform economy, enterprises have gradually evolved from unilateral operation or bilateral cooperation with external entities to multilateral win-win cooperation based on platform strategy. The digital economy has brought new potential energy for the innovation subject to integrate external digital innovation resources and develop financing innovation. For this reason, the combination of multiple digital economic effects has become the key linkto improve urban innovation ability by promoting integrated innovation development.#br#This study analyzes the concept and connotation of integrated innovation from the perspectives of"integration" and "mobility". "Integration" is mainly reflected in the integration of multiple innovation entities and the open integration of organizational boundaries. The technology threshold and oligopoly in the traditional economy make it difficult for diversified producers to enter the high-tech industries, and consequently due to the lack of collaborative innovation, the problem of production homogenization is unavoidable. Financing innovation is a new innovation paradigm and it can promote the deep integration of industrial chain and innovation chain, facilitate the integration and complementation of heterogeneous resources of different innovation subjects, optimize the allocation of innovation resources, and deeply integrate basic research, application research and industrialization research, which is conducive to breaking the barriers between the government, universities, research institutes, large and small enterprises, intermediaries and other innovation subjects, so as tointegrate each link and each subject more closely in the innovation chain. On the basis of the deep integration of enterprises, universities and governments, the relationship among innovation subjects gradually turns to the value symbiotic relationship,which implies the reshaping of the competition and cooperation relationship with the idea of innovation alliance. Because financial innovation can give full play to the advantages of external innovation subjects in innovation, and externalize innovation, enterprise technology innovation and product development could be promoted. The emergence of financial innovation mode is based on the development of digital economy. Therefore, it is important to study how the effects of digital economy affect the development of financial innovation.#br#This study uses the fsQCA method to analyze the condition configuration and realization path of digital economy penetration effect, mapping effect and scale effect on urban integration innovation level. It takes 27 cities in the Yangtze River Delta as samples. The results show that high financing innovation level has six driving paths and can be divided into three different effect level models. Among the selected paths, scale effect is the main core condition, followed by penetration effect, and mapping effect plays an important role in supporting the six driving paths. Multi-factor synergy helps to improve the level of urban integration and innovation. The effective combination of various factors will promote the improvement of urban integration and innovation level through different path regression. Due to the difference of resource endowment, the innovation capability of cities in the Yangtze River Delta is obviously different. According to the original capabilities and core competitiveness of each city, 27 sample cities are divided into "source" cities and "trickle-down" cities. The analysis shows that compared with "trickle-down" cities, "source" cities can use more diversified resource elements to improve the level of integration and innovation, and the correlation between the elements is higher. #br#On the basis of the above research conclusions, this study puts forward three policy suggestions to improve the level of urban financing innovation. First, it is necessary to deeply promote digital development and urban financing innovation with digital technology as a tool. Second, cities should strengthen the synergy and coupling of digital economic effects. Last but not the least, it is vital to keep focused onthe formation and evolution of urban agglomeration spatial innovation network, and effectively exert the positive spillover effect of regional digital economy development on urban financing innovation.#br#