科技人才培育

平台型领导对员工越轨创新的影响——一个有调节的链式中介模型

  • 蒋兵 ,
  • 王文竹 ,
  • 王心娟
展开
  • (山东理工大学 管理学院,山东 淄博 255000)
蒋兵(1982—),男,山东淄博人,博士,山东理工大学管理学院副教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为组织管理、人力资源管理;王文竹(1996—),女,山东青岛人,山东理工大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为组织与人力资源管理;王心娟(1968—),女,山东潍坊人,山东理工大学管理学院教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为人力资源管理。

收稿日期: 2021-10-05

  修回日期: 2021-12-09

  网络出版日期: 2023-04-03

基金资助

山东省社会科学基金项目(18CGLJ09)

The Influence of Platform Leadership on Employees Deviant Innovation:A Moderated Serial Mediation Model

  • Jiang Bing ,
  • Wang Wenzhu ,
  • Wang Xinjuan
Expand
  • (Management School, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

Received date: 2021-10-05

  Revised date: 2021-12-09

  Online published: 2023-04-03

摘要

基于自我一致性理论、自我决定理论、三元交互理论,引入独立型自我建构和工作重塑作为中介变量,构建平台型领导驱动员工越轨创新行为的链式中介模型,探讨差错管理氛围的调节作用。通过342份有效问卷实证分析发现:平台型领导正向驱动员工越轨创新行为;独立型自我建构和工作重塑在平台型领导与员工越轨创新之间发挥部分中介作用;独立型自我建构正向激发员工工作重塑行为,两者在平台型领导与员工越轨创新之间发挥链式中介作用;差错管理氛围正向调节平台型领导、独立型自我建构、工作重塑与员工越轨创新之间的关系。

本文引用格式

蒋兵 , 王文竹 , 王心娟 . 平台型领导对员工越轨创新的影响——一个有调节的链式中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023 , 40(6) : 140 -150 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021100017

Abstract

With the rising tide of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, the innovation-driven digital economy is promoting the intelligent manufacturing and platform transformation of enterprises. It is necessary to keep exploration and innovation for further development in the complex and changeable competitive environment. The essence of enterprise innovation is the innovation of employees, which is inseparable from the self-breakthrough and reform of employees. As one of the important ways to help enterprises break the core rigidity of the organization and stimulate unexpected innovation or even subversive innovation, the employee deviant innovation is an important power source to improve the creativity and innovation of the organization. Therefore, it becomes particularly important of how to stimulate employee deviant innovation accurately and effectively. Platform leadership is a new leadership model that can provide grassroots employees with a platform for development. It can enhance the possibility of employee exploration breakthrough, which also is the key cause of stimulating employee deviant innovative behavior. It has an important impact on the reform and development of organizations and employees. So it is of great significance to explore the influence mechanism and boundary conditions of platform leadership on employee deviant innovation behavior.#br#This paper constructs a serial intermediary model of platforming leadership, independent self-construction, remodeling job and employee deviant innovation, and explores the dual path influencing mechanism of distributed leadership on employee deviant innovation behavior based on the self-consistency theory, self-determination theory and three-way interaction theory. It also analyzes the serial mediating role of independent self-construction and job crafting of all distributed leadership and employee deviant innovation and the moderating role of error management atmosphere. The data for this study were from 342 valid questionnaire obtained after online and offline surveys and return visits to the employees. The 342 valid questionnaires were empirically analyzed by SPSS22.0 and AMOS23.0 software. Firstly, descriptive statistical analysis, reliability and validity test, confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis were carried out to confirm that the samples were suitable for regression analysis. Then, the main effect, mediating effect and moderating effect of this study were tested by hierarchical regression. Finally, Bootstrap was used to test the serial mediation effect.#br#The results show that platform leadership positively drives employee deviant innovation behavior; independent self-construction and job crafting partially mediate the relationship between platform leadership and employee deviant innovation; independent self-construction can positively stimulate the behavior of employees' job crafting, and both independent self-construction and job crafting play a chain mediating role between platform leadership and employee deviant innovation; error management atmosphere positively moderated the relationship among platform leadership, independent self-construction, job crafting and employee deviant innovation. #br#To sum up, on the premise that innovation is fundamental to enterprise progress and development, this study constructs an integrated analytical framework. By integrating two mediating variables, independent self-construction and job crafting, it interprets the influence mechanism and process of platform leadership on employees' active changes from a new perspective. It improves the boundary conditions of distributed leadership influencing the mechanism of employees' active change behavior, expands and enriches the theories and researches of human resource management in the era of platform economy. In addition, this study also provides management inspiration for realizing the development of organizational platform by getting through in-depth interpretation of the characteristics and advantages of the new leadership style of platforming leadership, as well as its cognitive function, stimulation process and influence boundary on the formation of employee deviant behavior. Enterprises should speed up the construction of a platform-based organization to invite both managers and employees for employee develop together, encourage a tolerant atmosphere of mistakes in deviant innovation, provide employees with more training and introduce deviant innovation into the enterprise culture. Future research can expand the scope of sample selection to cover more geographical areas, so as to eliminate the possibility of accidental phenomena in local areas. It is suggested to have a follow-up survey to make the data more convincing. In addition, researchers can try to explore the influence mechanism of platform leadership on employee deviant innovation behavior from different perspectives, andthe possibility of more reasonable boundary conditions.#br#

参考文献

[1] LIU X Q,BARANCHENKO Y,FANSUO A,et al. The impact of ethical leadership on employee creative deviance: the mediating role of job autonomy[J]. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 2020, 42(2): 219-232.
[2] 吴士健,杜梦贞,周忠宝.和合文化情境下包容性领导如何影响员工越轨创新行为[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(17):142-151.
[3] 郝旭光.平台型领导:一种新的领导类型[J].中国人力资源开发,2016,30(4):6-11.
[4] AUGSDORFER P. A diagnostic personality test to identify likely corporate bootleg researchers[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2012,16(1):31-48.
[5] DAVID L,JIRI C,TOMAS U. Psychometric properties of the independent and interdependent self-construal questionnaire: evidence from the Czech republic[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021,26(5):11-21.
[6] LEANA C,APPELBAUM E,SHEVCHUK I. Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: the role of job crafting[J]. The Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(6):1169-1192.
[7] 郝旭光.平台型领导:自达达人[J].北大商业评论,2014,12(9):22,92-99.
[8] 辛杰,孔茗,谢荣贝.平台型领导:概念、维度与测量[J].科学学研究,2020,38(8):1481-1488.
[9] 郝旭光,张嘉祺,雷卓群,等.平台型领导:多维度结构、测量与创新行为影响验证[J].管理世界,2021,37(1):12,186-199,216.
[10] MERTON R K.Social theory and social structure[J].Quarterly Review of Biology,1968,34(4):53-63.
[11] FORD C M. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(4): 1112-1142.
[12] CRISCUOLO P,SALTER A,ANNE L J.Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance[J]. Organization Science,2014,25(5):1287-1305.
[13] 郝旭光,张嘉祺. 平台型领导:一种新的领导类型[N]. 北京日报,2021-03-22(11).
[14] JORIS V V,BRAM S. Team innovation through collaboration: how visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion[J]. Public Management Review,2021,23(9):1275-1294.
[15] 王红椿,练玉.谦卑型领导与员工主动变革行为:心理资本的中介作用和独立性自我建构的调节作用[J].惠州学院学报,2018,38(1):59-64.
[16] 肖影影.自我建构对大学生就业自信的影响研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
[17] OEBERST A,WU S. Independent vs. interdependent self-construal and interrogative compliance: intra-cultural and cross-cultural evidence[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2015,85(5):50-55.
[18] 王弘钰,崔智淞,李孟燃.冲突视角下新生代员工越轨创新行为的影响因素研究——独立型自我建构和组织创新氛围的调节作用[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2018,38(7):60-71.
[19] 贾绪计,林崇德,李艳玲.独立自我建构、创造性人格、创意自我效能感与创造力的关系[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016,61(1):60-67.
[20] CROSS R,PARKER A.The hidden power of social networks: understanding how work really gets done in organizations[J].Harvard Business Review Press,2004,23(5):12-23.
[21] JUDGE T A,ZAPATA C P.The person situation debate revisited: effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance[J].Academy of Mangement Journal,2015,58(4):1149-1179.
[22] DUTTON J E,DEBEBE G,WRZESNIEWSKI A.A social valuing perspective on relationship sensemaking[R].Working Paper of University of Michigan,2000.
[23] 胡睿玲,田喜洲.重构工作身份与意义——工作重塑研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2015,37(10):69-81.
[24] TIMAS M,BAKKER A B,DERKS D. Development and validation of the job crafting scale[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2011, 80(1): 173-186.
[25] WRZESNIEWSKI A,DUTTON J E. Crafting a job: re-visioning employees as active crofters of their work[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(2):179-201.
[26] MOHAMMED B S,ABDULLAH A N,MOHAMMED B A. The bottom-up impact of proactive personality on employee job crafting: a serial mediation model[J]. The Journal of Psychology,2021, 155(6): 523-547.
[27] ZHANG F,PARKER S K.Reorienting job crafting research: a hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2019,40(2):126-146.
[28] LUKASZ K,LUKASZ B. What is job crafting:review of theoretical models of job crafting[J]. Medycyna Pracy,2021,72(4):423-436.
[29] WANG Y X,LAU D C. How and why job crafting influences creative performance: a resource allocation explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2021,22(5):1-27.
[30] TIMS M,BAKKER A B,DERKS D. Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy-performance relationship[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2014,29(5):490-507.
[31] MULDER L B,AQUINO K. The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2013,121(2):219-230.
[32] RICHARD R M,EDWARD D L.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being[J].American Psychologist,2000,55(1):68-78.
[33] KEITH N,FRESE M.Enhancing firm performance and innovativeness through error management culture[M]//The handbook of organizational culture and climate, Thousand Oaks,CA:SAGE,2010:137-157.
[34] CATHY V D,MICHAEL F,MARKUS B,et al. Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: a two-study replication[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology,2005,90(6):1228-1240.
[35] ALBERT B,DANIEL C. Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1986,38(1):92-113.
[36] 李晓楠.差错管理氛围对员工双元创新行为的影响机制研究[J].市场周刊,2021,34(4):157-160.
[37] CARMELI A,SHEAFFER Z,BINYAMIN G,et al. Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: the mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior,2014,48(2):115-135.
[38] 要静如. 新生代员工的主动性人格对其创新行为的影响机制研究[D].太原:山西财经大学,2020.
[39] 潘黎,吕巍.自我建构量表在成人中的应用和修订[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2013,21(5):710-712.
[40] SLEMP G R,VELLA-BRODRICK D A. Optimizing employee mental health: the relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and employee well-being[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies,2014,15(4):957-977.
[41] CIGULAROV K P,CHEN P Y,ROSECRANCE J. The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: a multi-level study[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010,42(5):1498-1506.
文章导航

/