科技管理创新

基于XGBoost算法的机会型创业预测研究

  • 陈成梦 ,
  • 黄永春 ,
  • 吴商硕 ,
  • 钱春琳
展开
  • (1.河海大学 商学院,江苏 南京 211100;2.河海大学 社会科学研究院,江苏 南京 210098)
陈成梦(1995—),女,山东临沂人,河海大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新与创业管理;黄永春(1982—),男,江苏盱眙人,博士,河海大学商学院教授、博士生导师,河海大学社会科学研究院院长,研究方向为创新与创业管理;吴商硕(1996—),男,江苏盐城人,河海大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向为创业管理;钱春琳(1997—),女,江苏南通人,河海大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向为信息管理与数据挖掘。本文通讯作者:黄永春。

收稿日期: 2022-07-14

  修回日期: 2022-10-14

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(21BGL016);江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX22_0687);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(B220203035);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目(2021SJZDA027)

The Prediction of Opportunity-driven Entrepreneurship Based on XGBoost Algorithm

  • Chen Chengmeng ,
  • Huang Yongchun ,
  • Wu Shangshuo ,
  • Qian Chunlin
Expand
  • (1.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;2.Institute of Social Sciences, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Received date: 2022-07-14

  Revised date: 2022-10-14

  Online published: 2023-03-10

摘要

机会型创业对跨越中等收入陷阱,实现经济转型升级和高质量发展的作用日益凸显。基于计划行为理论,从主观规范、行为态度、知觉行为控制3个方面并结合人口统计学特征选择12个特征变量,构建机会型创业影响因素框架。在此基础上,基于全球创业观察数据库,运用XGBoost算法预测机会型创业并判别关键影响因素,将预测结果与3种机器学习算法进行比较。结果表明,基于准确率、精确率、召回率和F1值4个评估指标,XGBoost算法可以较好地预测机会型创业,优于逻辑回归、支持向量机和随机森林算法;创业自我效能、机会识别和关系感知是影响机会型创业的重要因素。聚焦新型创业研究,有助于拓展计划行为理论的适用边界和机器学习算法在创业领域的应用,为有效识别机会型创业和针对性培育机会型创业提供理论指导与实践启示。

本文引用格式

陈成梦 , 黄永春 , 吴商硕 , 钱春琳 . 基于XGBoost算法的机会型创业预测研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023 , 40(5) : 14 -22 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022070356

Abstract

Opportunity-driven entrepreneurship plays an increasingly prominent role in overcoming the middle-income trap, and realizing economic transformation and high-quality development, especially in the face of an increasingly complex international environment and the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Existing studies have pointed out some influencing factors of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, but they are relatively fragmented. As an influential behavioral prediction theory in the field of social psychology, the theory of planned behavior can effectively predict entrepreneurial intention and subsequent entrepreneurial behaviors. It provides a comprehensive and powerful explanatory framework for opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. At the same time, entrepreneurial activity is a complex social issue and is subject to the dynamic nature of nonlinear network feedback system. As a result, it is hard to predict entrepreneurial activity. The significance level of traditional regression methods is influenced by the sample size and the coefficient is influenced by the measurement scale, which makes it difficult to assess the importance of influencing factors as well. Opportunity-driven entrepreneurship involves plenty of characteristic variables, and the relationship between each variable and opportunity-driven entrepreneurship may not be limited to a single linear relationship.#br#With the advent of the era of big data and the development of computer information technology, artificial intelligence receives increasing attention in more and more research and application. It is disrupting industries, business management and innovation related to entrepreneurship, but little attention is paid to the field of entrepreneurship. As one of the core algorithms in the field of artificial intelligence, the machine learning algorithm can fit nonlinear relationships well and is suitable for dealing with the prediction of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. Therefore following the theory of planned behavior, the study selects 12 characteristic variables to construct the influencing factor framework of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship from subject norm, attitudes toward the behavior and perceived behavior control combined with demographic characteristics. The influencing factor framework specifically includes achievement orientation, risk taking, public recognition, media publicity, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, etc. A total of 19 805 samples are obtained from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor database in 2018. The XGBoost algorithm is used to predict opportunity-driven entrepreneurship and identify key influencing factors, and the results are compared with those of three machine learning algorithms. The results show that the XGBoost algorithm can predict opportunity-driven entrepreneurship better than support vector machine, random forest and logistic regression in accuracy, precision, recall and F1 value. According to the ROC curve, the AUC value can reach 0.94, which again shows that the prediction effect of XGBoost algorithm is good. In the meantime, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, opportunity recognition and relationship perception are important factors affecting opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, while demographic characteristics such as gender are less important.#br#This study makes two contributions.It first applies the theory of planned behavior and demographic characteristics to analyze the influencing factors of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, which helps make up for the lack of systematicity in the analysis of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship in previous studies, verifies the applicability of planned behavior theory in explaining opportunity-driven entrepreneurial behavior, and deepens the application of the theory in the field of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. Then the study combines artificial intelligence with opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, applies machine learning methods to the prediction of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, and establishes a prediction model of “whether individuals participate in opportunity-driven entrepreneurship”. The XGBoost algorithm has the best prediction effect on opportunity-driven entrepreneurship, and can detect the interaction ambiguity and nonlinear effects in the input data, extend the application of machine learning methods in the field of entrepreneurship, and make up for the shortcomings of traditional econometric analysis methods.#br#The study also provides practical insights and references for individuals, government and external investors. First, for government and external investors, they can identify potential opportunity-driven entrepreneurs based on the XGBoost algorithm to facilitate better allocation of resources to potential opportunity-driven entrepreneurs and reduce selection costs to promote opportunity-driven entrepreneurial practice. Second, the government should target to create an environment that fosters opportunity-driven entrepreneurship to continuously improve individual entrepreneurial self-efficacy, enhance individual entrepreneurial relationship perception, and strength individual entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. For individuals, special attention should be paid to enhancing entrepreneurial self-efficacy, focusing on the accumulation of entrepreneurial relationships and actively identifying entrepreneurial opportunities to transform into opportunity-driven entrepreneurial behavior.#br#

参考文献

[1] 黄永春,胡世亮,叶子,等.创业还是就业——行为经济学视角下的动态效用最大化分析[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(6):73-86.
[2] 刘伟,雍旻,邓睿.从生存型创业到机会型创业的跃迁——基于农民创业到农业创业的多案例研究[J].中国软科学,2018,33(6):105-118.
[3] ACS Z. How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth[J]. Innovations:Technology,Goverance,Globalization,2006,1(1):97-107.
[4] 陈成梦,黄永春,吴商硕,等.制度环境与创业认知组态如何驱动不同模式创业[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(13):12-20.
[5] SHANE S, VENKATARAMAN S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(1): 217-226.
[6] BOUDREAUX C J, NIKOLAEV B. Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions[J]. Small Business Economics,2019,53(3):709-738.
[7] 杨婵,贺小刚,李征宇.家庭结构与农民创业——基于中国千村调查的数据分析[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(12):170-188.
[8] ANGULO-GUERRERO M J, PREZ-MORENO S, ABAD-GUERRERO I M. How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries[J]. Journal of Business Research,2017,73:30-37.
[9] REY-MART A, PORCAR A T, MAS-TUR A. Linking female entrepreneurs' motivation to business survival[J]. Journal of Business Research,2015,68(4):810-814.
[10] BRUYAT C, JULIEN P A. Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2001,16(2): 165-180.
[11] ARIN K P, HUANG V Z, MINNITI M, et al. Revisiting the determinants of entrepreneurship: a bayesian approach[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 41(2): 607-631.
[12] 杜景南,黄德春.中国互联网银行消费者接受度的指标评价研究——基于人工神经网络的实证研究[J].南京社会科学,2018,29(2):27-35.
[13] OBSCHONKA M, AUDRETSCH D B. Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a new era has begun[J]. Small Business Economics, 2020, 55(3): 529-539.
[14] AJZEN I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):179-211.
[15] 王季,耿健男,肖宇佳.从意愿到行为:基于计划行为理论的学术创业行为整合模型[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(7):64-81.
[16] SOUITARIS V, ZERBINATI S, AL-LAHAM A. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? the effect of learning, inspiration and resources[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22(4): 566-591.
[17] DZSI-BENYOVSZKI A, SZAB T P. Intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs:do they differ in Romania[J]. Acta Oeconomica, 2017, 67(1): 43-61.
[18] 朱亚丽,郭长伟.基于计划行为理论的员工内部创业驱动组态研究[J].管理学报,2020,17(11):1661-1667.
[19] SHABIR S, ALI J. Determinants of early-stage entrepreneurship in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: evidence from the global entrepreneurship monitor database[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2022, 43(5): 1566-1578.
[20] LORTIE J, CASTOGIOVANNI G. The theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship research: what we know and future directions[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2015, 11(4): 935-957.
[21] 张广宁,泄玉珍,孟庆娜.成长型思维与创业行为倾向研究——基于创业失败恐惧的多维度调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(10):32-40.
[22] BOUDREAUX C J, NIKOLAEV B N, KLEIN P. Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: the moderating role of economic institutions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2019, 34(1): 178-196.
[23] 郑馨,周先波,陈宏辉,等.东山再起:怎样的国家制度设计能够促进失败再创业——基于56个国家7年混合数据的证据[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):136-151,181.
[24] 董志强,魏下海,汤灿晴.制度软环境与经济发展——基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J].管理世界,2012,28(4):9-20.
[25] 段文婷,江光荣.计划行为理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2008,26(2):315-320.
[26] AJZEN I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2002,32(4):665-683.
[27] CHEN C C, GREENE P G, CRICK A. Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers[J].Journal of Business Venturing,1998,13(4):295-316.
[28] 王言,周绍妮,石凯.国有企业并购风险预警及其影响因素研究——基于数据挖掘和XGBoost算法的分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,42(3):46-57.
[29] 刘吉祥,肖龙珠,周江评,等.建成环境与青少年步行通学的非线性关系——基于极限梯度提升模型的研究[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(2):251-263.
[30] 叶文平,杨学儒,朱沆.创业活动影响幸福感吗——基于国家文化与制度环境的比较研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2018,21(4):4-14.
[31] 杨英,李岩,张秀娥,等.正式制度与非正式制度如何驱动社会创业——基于效率驱动型国家的QCA研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(3):21-29.
[32] 涂艳,王翔宇.基于机器学习的P2P网络借贷违约风险预警研究——来自“拍拍贷”的借贷交易证据[J].统计与信息论坛,2018,33(6):69-76.
[33] 赵振洋,齐舒月,李实秋.科技型中小企业专利证券化质量评价研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(12):56-64.
[34] HSU D K, BURMEISTER-LAMP K, SIMMONS S A, et al. “I know I can, but I don’t fit”: perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2019, 34(2): 311-326.
[35] 郭海.管理者的社会关系影响民营企业绩效的机制研究[J].管理科学,2013,26(4):13-24.
[36] AUTIO E H, KEELEY R, KLOFSTEN M, et al. Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA[J]. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2001, 2(2): 145-160.
文章导航

/