China has entered a new stage of high-quality development, transforming from quantity-accumulation innovation to quality-improvement innovation in the inherent requirement for achieving high-quality development. Over the past two decades, China has become the world's largest patent applicant country, but there is still a big gap between China and developed countries in terms of innovation quality. The technological blockade imposed by some western countries on China also shows that many core technologies are still disciplined by others. Meanwhile, manufacturing embedded servitization is the dominant path of manufacturing servitization, which has become a significant direction for the transformation and upgrading of the global manufacturing industry, and an important way for China to enhance the enterprise competitiveness as well. However, events such as GE's decision to spin off its financial services business in 2017 raise the importance of exploring how servitization affects technological innovation in manufacturing companies. Can manufacturing embedded servitization effectively solve the low-quality dilemma of innovation in China? Therefor, how to promote Chinese enterprise high-quality innovation through manufacturing embedded servitization is the key to solve the "bottleneck" problem and speed up the construction of world innovation power.#br#This study measure the embedded servitization of listed manufacturing companies from 2008 to 2018 according to the main products information published in the annual reports. Specifically, if there is a strategic match or complementarity between the service provided by a manufacturing enterprise and the main products, it will be recorded as embedded servitization, and it is further divided into modern embedded service and traditional embedded service according to the degree of technology intensive. Moreover, this study collects the patent application and citation information of sample companies, and the patent quality is measured by the number of citations within 4 years from the date of application, and patent quantity is measured by the number of utility patents and invention patents successfully applied. In addition, mechanism variables include innovation resource and innovation behavior, the former includes R&D funding and R&D personnel, the latter includes cooperative innovation and exploratory Innovation. Panel fixed effects model and mediation mechanism model are used to conduct empirical tests, and instrumental variable model and zero inflation negative binomial model are used to reconfirm the results. The results show that firstly the modern embedded servitization has a double promoting effect on the quantity and quality of firm innovation, while traditional embedded servitization only promotes the patent quantity. Secondly, the innovation effects of embedded servitization have heterogeneous influence on different industry and stage of development, while traditional manufacturing and companies in growing stage can benefit more, comparing with high-tech industry and mature firms. Thirdly, the mediation mechanism tests show that the embedded servitization affects firm innovation mainly by adjusting the structure of production factors and optimizing the innovation behavior, and the innovation resources and exploration innovation are the main channels. 〖HJ*2/7〗#br# This study makes contributions in following three aspects. Firstly, it measures the degree of embedded servitization in manufacturing enterprises, and based on the degree of knowledge intensity, manufacturing service embeddedness is further divided into modern service embeddedness and traditional service embeddedness. Secondly, it confirms the mediating effect of enterprise factor structure adjustment mechanism and enterprise innovation behavior optimization, which open the black box of manufacturing embedded servitization on enterprise innovation. Thirdly, the study reveals many specific conclusions and policy implications that provide micro evidence to explore an effective path of manufacturing servitization, which has certain reference value for improving innovation capacity to solve the low-quality dilemma of innovation in China.#br#According to the research conclusions, the following policy implications are drawn. First, the application of modern service such as the industrial Internet, artificial intelligence and 5G in manufacturing enterprises should be promoted. Meanwhile, it is necessary to accelerate the construction of modern service platforms such as research consultation, inspection and testing institutions. Second, exploring suitable manufacturing servitization paths for enterprises in different industries and development stages, such as strengthening the integration of traditional manufacturing with modern services and increasing the support for the servitization of growing enterprises. Third, local governments should strengthen R&D talent attraction and training program to meet the demand of talents in service transformation, at the same time, enterprises are encouraged to build an open and diversified collaborative innovation network, which will enhance the capacity for independent innovation through openness and cooperation.#br#
[1] KOWALKOWSKI C, GEBAUER H, KAMP B, et al. Servitization and deservitization: overview, concepts, and definitions[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2017,60(1):4-10.
[2] IMMELT J R. How I remade GE[J]. Harvard Business Review,2017,95(5):42-51.
[3] VANDERMERWE S,RADA J. Servitization of business: adding value by adding services[J]. European Management Journal,1988,6(4):314-324.
[4] GEBAUER H. Identifying service strategies in product manufacturing companies by exploring environment-strategy configurations[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2008,37(3):278-291.
[5] 简兆权,伍卓深. 制造业服务化的路径选择研究——基于微笑曲线理论的观点[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(12):137-143.
[6] 许和连,成丽红,孙天阳. 制造业投入服务化对企业出口国内增加值的提升效应——基于中国制造业微观企业的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(10):62-80.
[7] CUSUMANO M A, KAHL S J, SUAREZ F F. Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(4):559-575.
[8] 刘斌,魏倩,吕越,等.制造业服务化与价值链升级[J].经济研究,2016,51(3):151-162.
[9] NEELY A. Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing[J]. Operations Management Research,2009,1(2):103-118.
[10] FANG E E, PALMATIER R W, STEENKAMP J. Effect of service transition strategies on firm value[J]. Journal of Marketing,2008,72(5):1-14.
[11] 刘斌,赵晓斐.制造业投入服务化、服务贸易壁垒与全球价值链分工[J].经济研究,2020,55(7):159-174.
[12] FRANCOIS J, MANCHIN M, TOMBERGER P. Services linkages and the value added content of trade[J]. The World Economy,2015,38(11):1631-1649.
[13] LODEFALK M. The role of services for manufacturing firm exports[J]. Review of World Economics,2014,150(1):59-82.
[14] ULAGA W, REINARTZ W J. Hybrid offerings:how manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully[J].Journal of Marketing,2011,75(6):5-23.
[15] 张军,陈晓萍,姜中霜.用户-企业共享价值诉求与企业创新能力关系研究——以顾客授权为中介[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(12):177-185.
[16] 刘维刚,倪红福. 制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步:效应及作用机制[J].财贸经济,2018,39(8):126-140.
[17] VISNJIC I, WIENGARTEN F, NEELY A. Only the brave: product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016,33(1): 36-52.
[18] JEKATERINA D, ANDREAS S, Ali Z B, et al. Paradoxes in servitization: a processual perspective[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2022,101(2):141-152.
[19] ANDREAS E, JENS H, WOLFGANG U, et al.Industrial services, product innovations, and firm profitability: a multiple-group latent growth curve analysis[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011,40(5): 661-670.
[20] ZHOU K Z,LI C B. How does strategic orientation matter in Chinesefirms[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2007,24(1):447-466.
[21] 郭朝先.产业融合创新与制造业高质量发展[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(4):49-60.
[22] 张昕蔚.数字经济条件下的创新模式演化研究[J].经济学家, 2019,4(7):32-39.
[23] AKU V. Explaining servitization failure and deservitization: a knowledge-based perspective[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2017, 60(1):138-150.
[24] 刘继国.制造业服务化带动新型工业化的机理与对策[J].经济问题探索,2006,26(6):120-124.
[25] SAMPSON R C. R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(2):364-386.
[26] O'CONNOR G C, DEMARTINO R. Organizing for radical innovation: an exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 23(6):475-497.
[27] 杨仁发,汪青青.生产性服务投入、技术创新与制造业国际竞争力[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,40(9):62-75.
[28] 庄彩云,陈国宏,梁娟,等.互联网能力、双元战略柔性与知识创造绩效[J].科学学研究,2020,38(10):1837-1846+1910.
[29] JANSEN J,VAN D, VOLBERDA H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674.
[30] SAWHNEY M, VERONA G, PRANDLLI E. Collaborating to create: the Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2005,19(4): 4-17.
[31] HALL B H,JAFFE A,TRAJTENBERG M.Market value and patent citations[J].Rand Journal of Economics,2005,36(1):16-38.
[32] 刘灿雷,高超.教育、人力资本与创新——基于“量”与“质”的双重考察[J].财贸经济,2021,42(5):110-126.
[33] 温忠麟.张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,4(5):614-620.
[34] 康志勇.融资约束、政府支持与中国本土企业研发投入[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(5):61-70.