区域科学发展

科技金融政策如何促进城市绿色创新发展——来自“科技和金融结合试点政策”的证据

  • 顾江寒 ,
  • 柴华奇
展开
  • (西北工业大学 管理学院,陕西 西安 710072)
顾江寒(1989—),男,陕西西安人,西北工业大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新与经济增长;柴华奇(1968—),男,陕西西安人,博士,西北工业大学管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为区域经济学。

收稿日期: 2021-06-15

  修回日期: 2021-08-31

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-10

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC790029);陕西省教育厅科研计划项目(20JT065);陕西省社会科学基金项目(2020D026);中国博士后基金面上项目(2020M683690XB)

Has the Science and Technology Finance Promoted Green Innovation?Evidence from the Pilot Policy of Combining Science and Technology with Finance

  • Gu Jianghan ,
  • Chai Huaqi
Expand
  • (School of Management,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710072,China)

Received date: 2021-06-15

  Revised date: 2021-08-31

  Online published: 2022-08-10

摘要

借助科技和金融结合试点政策“准自然实验”,基于2004—2019年中国内地地级市面板数据,使用双重差分法评估科技和金融结合试点政策对绿色创新的影响。研究发现,试点政策显著促进绿色创新发展,且随着试点政策的不断推进,这种促进作用呈现持续增强的动态演化规律。机制研究结果表明,试点政策对绿色创新的促进作用通过拓展公共科技金融资源和市场科技金融资源得以实现。异质性研究结果表明,创新资源投入越丰富、创新能力越强的城市,这种促进作用越显著。试点政策不仅有助于提升城市绿色创新水平,还有利于提高绿色全要素生产率。研究结论可为试点政策的进一步推广提供有效支撑,并为城市绿色发展提供重要启示。

本文引用格式

顾江寒 , 柴华奇 . 科技金融政策如何促进城市绿色创新发展——来自“科技和金融结合试点政策”的证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022 , 39(15) : 41 -49 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021060366

Abstract

Green innovation can promote economic development by reducing pollution, saving costs, enhancing enterprise competitiveness, and improving green total factor productivity.Green innovation helps to enhance national comprehensive strength and achieve sustainable economic development, and the importance is self-evident. In order to achieve the “3060” goal of carbon peak and carbon neutral, and promote the construction of ecological civilization, it is necessary for China to involve more enterprises in green innovation. However, there are many problems in China's innovation development in terms of input, external environment, and efficiency; these problems cannot be solved without the comprehensive combination and effective integration of the financial system and the technological innovation system. The purpose of the combination of science and technology with finance is to promote the transformation of technological innovation and its innovation achievements.#br#In order to promote the combination of science and technology with finance, speed up the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and enhance innovation capacity, the Ministry of Science and Technology led the “pilot project of promoting the combination of science and technology with finance” in 2010, and identified the first batch of pilot cities in December 2011, involving eastern, central and western areas in China. By the end of 2015, there had been nearly 360 relevant policies, pointing out that financial support for technological innovation should be provided from various aspects in the future. Many domestic scholars have found that sci-tech finance can contribute to regional economic development and innovation development. Then there is a question: can sci-tech finance stimulate the vitality of green innovation, promote the development of green innovation, accelerate the realization of the “3060” goal, and promote the construction of ecological civilization? If so, what is the mechanism? If not, what are the obstacles to sci-tech finance driving green innovation and how to counteract the negative effects?#br#In view of this, based on the panel data of prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2019, this paper uses the difference-in-differences method to investigate whether sci-tech finance can promote the development of green innovation. The results show that the pilot policies significantly promote green innovation, and with the continuous promotion of policies, this promoting effect shows a dynamic evolution law of continuous enhancement. The mechanism study shows that the promotion effect of pilot policies on green innovation is realized by improving public and market financial resources. Heterogeneity study shows that the promotion effect of pilot policies is influenced by regional innovation input and innovation capacity. The richer the innovation input resources are, the stronger the regional innovation capacity is, and the more obvious the promotion effect of pilot policies is. Further research shows that the pilot policies not only improve the level of green innovation in the pilot cities, but also contribute to the further improvement of green total factor productivity.#br#The contributions of this stduy are mainly as follows. To start with, this paper is the first to investigate the pilot policy effect on regional innovation, enriching the research of green innovation and expanding the economic effect evaluation of the pilot policy. Second, in terms of the evaluation method, the pilot policy is an “exogenous shock” to each region, which helps us to effectively investigate the policy effect by using the difference-in-differences method. Compared with other literature on the pilot policy, this paper overcomes the interference of relevant policies on measurement results and obtains cleaner measurement results, which makes the conclusions of this paper more reliable. Third, in terms of policy implications, the research conclusion of this paper shows that if we continue to deepen the combination of science in the future, we can not only improve the level of green innovation, but also contribute to the improvement of green total factor productivity and the realization of green economic development.#br#

参考文献

[1] POLZIN F,SANDERS M.How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe[J].Energy Policy,2020,147,111863.
[2] APAK S,ATAY E.Global competitiveness in the EU through green innovation technologies and knowledge problems[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015,181:207-217.
[3] DENG Y L,YOU D M,WANG J J.Optimal strategy for enterprises' green technology innovation from the perspective of political competition [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,235:930-942.
[4] ABBAS J,SAGAN M.Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,229(20):611-620.
[5] EKATERINA K,EKATERINA E,ANNA D,et al.Research of instruments for financing of innovation and investment construction projects[J].Procedia Engineering,2016,153(8):112-117.
[6] 赵昌文,陈春发,唐英凯.科技金融[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[7] 邹克,倪青山.公共科技金融存在替代效应吗——来自283个地市的证据[J].中国软科学,2019,34(3):164-173.
[8] 张芷若,谷国锋.中国科技金融与区域经济发展的耦合关系研究[J].地理科学,2020,40(5):79-87.
[9] 冯锐,马青山,刘传明.科技与金融结合对全要素生产率的影响——基于“促进科技和金融结合试点”准自然实验的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(4):1-9.
[10] 汪淑娟,谷慎.科技金融对中国经济高质量发展的影响研究——理论分析与实证检验[J].经济学家,2021,33(2):81-91.
[11] 徐玉莲,赵文洋,张涛.科技金融成熟度评价指标体系构建与应用[J].科技进步与对策,2017,33(11):118-124.
[12] 冯永琦,邱晶晶.科技金融政策的产业结构升级效果及异质性分析——基于“科技和金融结合试点”的准自然实验[J].产业经济研究,2021,20(2):128-142.
[13] LASHITEW,ADDISU A.The uneven effect of financial constraints: size,public ownership,and firm investment in ethiopia[J].World Development,2017(97):178-198.
[14] ZHANG W,CHIU Y B.Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? a non-linear perspective[J].Energy,2020,206:118048.
[15] GARCIA Q J,SEGARRA B A,TERUEL M.Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018,127:127-140.
[16] ZHANG Y M,XING C,WANG Y.Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? evidence from China's private enterprises[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,264:121698.
[17] MA Y,HOU G,YIN Q,et al.The sources of green management innovation: does internal efficiency demand pull or external knowledge supply push[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,202(20):582-590.
[18] BURNS B L,BARNEY J B,ANGUS R W,et al.Enrolling Stakeholders under conditions of risk and uncertainty[J].Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2016,10(1):97-106.
[19] 朱鸿鸣,赵昌文,姚露,等.中美科技银行比较研究——兼论如何发展我国的科技银行[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(10):84-90.
[20] GHISETTI C,QUATRARO F.Green technologies and environmental productivity:a cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in italian regions[J].Ecological Economics,2017,132:1-13.
[21] 韩先锋,李勃昕,刘娟.中国OFDI逆向绿色创新的异质动态效应研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):32-42.
[22] HOWELL S T.Financing innovation:evidence from R&D grants[J].American Economic Review,2017,107(4):1136-1164.
[23] CANTONI D,CHEN Y Y,YANG D Y,et al.Curiculum and ideology[J].Journal of Political Economy,2017,125:338-392.
[24] 邓向荣, 冯学良, 李宝伟. 金融改革与地区产业结构升级——来自金融改革试验区设立的准自然实验[J].经济学家,2021,33(2):71-80.
[25] 陈浩,刘培,许佩.城市绿色全要素生产率演变机制研究——基于城市能源与土地要素约束的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(9):93-105.
文章导航

/