特稿

场景驱动的创新:内涵特征、理论逻辑与实践进路

  • 尹西明 ,
  • 苏雅欣 ,
  • 陈劲 ,
  • 陈泰伦
展开
  • (1. 北京理工大学 管理与经济学院,北京 100081;2.教育部人文社科重点研究基地 清华大学技术创新研究中心,北京 100084;3.清华大学 经济管理学院,北京 100084)
尹西明(1991—),男,河南平顶山人,博士,北京理工大学管理与经济学院特别副研究员、助理教授、硕士生导师,清华大学技术创新研究中心副研究员,研究方向为创新管理、数字经济与学术创业;陈劲(1968—),男,浙江余姚人,博士,教育部“长江学者”特聘教授,清华大学技术创新研究中心主任,清华大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为创新管理与科技政策。本文通讯作者:陈劲。

收稿日期: 2022-06-09

  修回日期: 2022-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(72104027);北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重大项目(21LLGLA002);北京理工大学研究生教育培养综合改革重点项目 (2022ALJX012)

Context-driven Innovation: Connotation, Theoretical Logic and Practical Approach

  • Yin Ximing ,
  • Su Yaxin ,
  • Chen Jin ,
  • Chen Tailun
Expand
  • (1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;2. Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;3. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Received date: 2022-06-09

  Revised date: 2022-06-28

  Online published: 2022-08-10

摘要

新发展阶段,科技创新要超越传统的技术驱动,把握场景驱动的新范式、新机遇,发挥我国超大规模市场和丰富应用场景的优势,实现从创新追赶到创新引领的跨越。结合数字经济时代世界科技强国建设理论与实践,在回顾现有创新范式的基础上,系统探讨场景驱动的创新的内涵特征、理论逻辑、实践进路与典型案例,并展望未来研究和实践前沿。场景驱动的创新既是将现有技术应用于特定场景,进而创造更大价值的过程,也是基于未来趋势与愿景需求,驱动战略、技术、组织、市场需求等创新要素及情境要素整合共融,突破现有技术瓶颈,开发新技术、新产品、新渠道、新商业模式,乃至开辟新市场和新领域的过程。研究成果可为数字经济时代坚持创新引领发展,加快推进技术、场景和商业模式融合创新,以场景驱动原始性创新、关键核心技术突破、重大技术应用提供重要理论和实践启示。

本文引用格式

尹西明 , 苏雅欣 , 陈劲 , 陈泰伦 . 场景驱动的创新:内涵特征、理论逻辑与实践进路[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022 , 39(15) : 1 -10 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060988

Abstract

In the new development stage, science and technology innovation needs to go beyond the traditional technology-driven paradigm, seize the transformation opportunity of context-driven innovation, and realize the leap from catching up to leading innovation by taking advatage of China's super large market and rich application environment.Data has become a new productive factor and an important driving force for innovation in the era of digital economy. With the increasingly rapid development of technological innovation, greater changes in market demand and closer integration of demand side and supply side, how can we reconstruct technology system and business model to unleash the value of data element, and promote the iteration of technology, products and services by leveraging the multiple contexts? This has become a key and hot topic in innovation management and digital transformation study. #br#However, China's technological innovation policy and practice used to follow the traditional linear innovation paradigm, that is, from fundamental research to industrial commercialization, which is a technology-driven development paradigm in essence. This paradigm is confronted with critical problems such as long R&D cycle, sluggish technology iteration, lack of comprehensive and refined task design for major national strategical objectives,etc. It is likely to fall into the “innovation dilemma”, thus hindering the transformation from innovation catchup to global innovation leadership. In this situation, how can the government and leading technological firms jointly open and build diversified innovation contexts, strengthen the design of context tasks and the reconstruction of innovation systems? The answer shall be the key to solve the problems of technology commercialization, and accelerate the digital transformation as well as promote the healthy and sustainable development of innovation ecosystem and platform economy. After reviewing the existing innovation paradigms and looking forward to its future research and practice frontier, this paper draws the theory and practice of innovation-driven development in the era of digital economy, and systematically discusses the connotation and features, theoretical logic, innovation path and typical practice of context-driven innovation. Specifically, context-driven innovation (CDI) is the process of applying existing technologies to specific contexts or scenarios to create greater value. It is also the process of promoting the integration and co-creation of strategy, technology, organization, market demand and various innovation elements based on future trends and visionary needs, therefore coping with the technological bottlenecks, and creating new technologies, new products, new channels, new processes and even new markets. #br#This paper contributes to the innovation theory development, national innovation system research and innovation practice in the digital era in three ways. First, this study explores both challenges and improvement opportunities to existing paradigms in the era of digital economy. Then it combines the systematic and holistic thinking in Eastern philosophy, and proposes a new innovation paradigm, namely,context-driven innovation (CDI). It is the two-wheel drive of technological innovation and context demand under the guidance of application context support and mission strategy. Context-driven innovation is an original theoretical paradigm that conforms to the development of the digital economy, meets the needs of enterprise technological innovation management, and supports the growth of industrial resilience, regional sustainable and high-quality development. It also provides insights on the construction of a global scientific and technological powerhouse, as well as brand-new innovative policy design and practical thinking to further optimize the global innovation leadership of enterprises and industries, enhance regional and national innovation capabilities, and promote the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind. Second, context-driven innovation emphasizes the context-driven and mission-oriented significance, and it has pioneering, strategic, diversified, precise, holistic, and resilient characteristics, which are of great practical value for understanding both China's prominent innovation practices and global important and new innovation practices, helping managers and policymakers to improve their innovation capabilities based on contexts and strategies, and realizing future insights and global innovation leadership. Finally, context-driven innovation provides policy-oriented enlightenment, and has important implications for the state and local governments to target major contexts and optimize top-level strategic design to achieve a high level of scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement.#br#

参考文献

[1] 陈劲, 阳镇, 朱子钦. 新型举国体制的理论逻辑、落地模式与应用场景[J]. 改革, 2021,38(5): 1-17.
[2] 尹西明, 陈泰伦, 陈劲, 等. 面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(2): 51-60.
[3] 王玉荣, 李宗洁. 互联网+场景模式下反向驱动创新研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(20): 7-14.
[4] 江积海, 阮文强. 新零售企业商业模式场景化创新能创造价值倍增吗 [J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(2): 346-356.
[5] 尹西明, 王新悦, 陈劲, 等. 贝壳找房:自我颠覆的整合式创新引领产业数字化[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021(Z1): 118-128.
[6] 李健, 渠珂, 田歆, 等. 供应链金融商业模式、场景创新与风险规避——基于“橙分期”的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(2): 326-335.
[7] 尹西明, 陈劲. 产业数字化动态能力:源起、内涵与理论框架[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022,44(2): 114-123.
[8] 朱志华. 场景驱动创新:科技与经济融合的加速器[J]. 科技与金融, 2021,5(7): 63-66.
[9] 陈劲. 加强推动场景驱动的企业增长[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021,11(6): 1.
[10] 张华胜, 薛澜. 技术创新管理新范式:集成创新[J]. 中国软科学, 2002,17(12): 7-23.
[11] 丘海雄, 谢昕琰. 企业技术创新的线性范式与网络范式:基于经济社会学视角[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2016, 31(6): 16-26.
[12] LYNN L H, MOHAN REDDY N, ARAM J D. Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework[J]. Research Policy, 1996, 25(1): 91-106.
[13] 柳卸林, 何郁冰. 基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉[J]. 中国软科学, 2011,26(4): 104-117.
[14] KUKUK M, STADLER M. Market structure and innovation races /marktstruktur und innovationsrennen[J]. Jahrbücher fur Nationalo konomie und Statistik, 2005, 225.
[15] KLINE S J, ROSENBERG N. An overview of innovation. the positive sum strategy:harnessing technology for economic growth[M]. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
[16] 陈劲, 尹西明, 梅亮. 整合式创新:基于东方智慧的新兴创新范式[J]. 技术经济, 2017, 36(12): 1-10,29.
[17] 俞荣建, 李海明, 项丽瑶. 新兴技术创新:迭代逻辑、生态特征与突破路径[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2018, 34(9): 27-30.
[18] 尹本臻, 邢黎闻, 王宇峰. 场景创新,驱动数字经济创新发展[J]. 信息化建设, 2020,23(8): 54-55.
[19] 王新刚. 场景选择与设计:内外兼修方得正果[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021,11(6): 80-86.
[20] OWEN R, MACNAGHTEN P, STILGOE J. Responsible research and innovation:from science in society to science for society, with Society[J].Science and Public Policy, 2012, 39: 751-760.
[21] 莫祯贞, 王建. 场景:新经济创新发生器[J]. 经济与管理, 2018, 32(6): 51-55.
[22] KENNY D, MARSHALL J. Contextual marketing:the real business of the Internet[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(6): 119-125.
[23] 孙艳艳, 廖贝贝. 冬奥场景驱动下的北京国际科创中心建设路径[J]. 科技智囊, 2022,28(5): 8-15.
[24] 刘昌新, 吴静. 塑造数字经济:数字化应用场景战略[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021,11(6): 92-96.
[25] 陈春花. 2022年经营关键词[J]. 企业管理, 2022,43(2): 11-13.
[26] 李高勇, 刘露. 场景数字化:构建场景驱动的发展模式[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021,11(6): 87-91.
[27] 钱菱潇, 王荔妍. 绿色场景创新:构建数字化驱动的发展模式[J]. 清华管理评论, 2022,12(3): 34-41.
[28] 邹波, 杨晓龙, 董彩婷. 基于大数据合作资产的数字经济场景化创新[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(4): 34-43.
[29] 尹西明, 林镇阳, 陈劲, 等. 数据要素价值化动态过程机制研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 40(2): 220-229.
[30] 尹西明, 林镇阳, 陈劲, 等. 数字基础设施赋能区域创新发展的过程机制研究——基于城市数据湖的案例研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022,43: 1-18.
[31] SHARMA R S,YANG Y.A hybrid scenario planning methodology for interactive digital media[J].Long Range Planning,2015,48(6):412-429.
[32] 卢珊, 蔡莉, 詹天悦, 等. 组织间共生关系:研究述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(10): 68-84.
[33] 陈春花. 价值共生:数字化时代新逻辑[J]. 企业管理, 2021,42(6): 6-9.
[34] 陈春花, 朱丽, 刘超, 等. 协同共生论:数字时代的新管理范式[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(1): 68-83.
[35] 陈劲, 陈红花, 尹西明, 等. 中国创新范式演进与发展——新中国成立以来创新理论研究回顾与思考[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 49(1): 14-28.
[36] 陈春花, 刘祯. 水样组织:一个新的组织概念[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(7): 3-14.
[37] 陈春花, 朱丽, 钟皓, 等. 中国企业数字化生存管理实践视角的创新研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2019,28(10): 1-8.
[38] 万碧玉. 应用场景驱动下的数字孪生城市[J]. 中国建设信息化, 2020,26(13): 48-49.
[39] 徐顽强. 数字化转型嵌入社会治理的场景重塑与价值边界[J]. 求索, 2022,42(2): 124-132.
文章导航

/