In recent years, it has become increasingly common for enterprises to seek value breakthroughs by industrial integration or cross-border development in economy transformation and upgrading. Boundary-spanning technology M&A are effective means for enterprises to cross borders, and they have become a new feature of M&A. In boundary-spanning technology M&A, technology is usually an important focus for the host enterprise. Therefore, this study centers on the boundary-spanning technology M&A which is defined as a M&A of the principal merging party targeting a firm that spans its own technology or product area.
The most important concern of boundary-spanning technology M&A is whether a company can promote innovation performance through M&A, and the key to innovation performance improvement lies in the integration of the resources acquired through M&A. Due to the cross-domain nature of outsourced technical knowledge, the integration of resources after boundary-spanning technology M&A is more uncontrollable than that in technology M&A, and the absorptive capacity of the host firm is also more demanding. In boundary-spanning technology M&A, the absorptive capacity of the host company plays a role in the interaction with the company's ambidextrous innovation tendency, the external technological environment and many other factors. The only way for an enterprise to effectively absorb and integrate knowledge from outside the "realm" and achieve leapfrogging of innovation activities is to consider the match between its context and its own absorptive capacity.This paper applies the absorption theory and proposes an integrated analytical framework for realizing the innovation performance of boundary-spanning technology M&A firms based on the external technological environment and the ambidextrous innovation tendency of the firms. It adopts the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and takes the boundary-spanning technology mergers and acquisitions of listed companies in stock markets of Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007 to 2015 as a sample to investigate what kind of absorptive capacity needs to be built to match a firm's innovation tendency in order to achieve high innovation performance in a complex external technological environment.
Three high innovation performance constructs are found. First, in a situation with abundant external technological resources and a tendency to exploit innovation, if a firm has a high potential absorptive capacity, it can achieve high innovation performance without emphasizing real absorptive transformation capacity; if there is a shortage of potential absorptive capacity, it can compensate for the shortage of potential absorptive capacity by increasing real absorptive capacity to achieve high innovation performance. Second, under the circumstances of abundant external technological resources and exploratory innovation tendency, it is very important for boundary-spanning technology M&A firms to have a diversified technological base, and high innovation performance can be achieved even without high realistic absorption and conversion investment intensity. Third, under the situation where external technological resources are not abundant, the chances of achieving technological breakthroughs are small, and high innovation performance can only be achieved by strengthening the realistic absorptive capacity to digest external technologies under the exploitative innovation tendency. The results further confirm that in boundary-spanning technology M&A, there is a differential matching relationship between the external technological environment of the merging firms, the ambidextrous innovation tendency and the different dimensions of their absorptive capacity; there is a certain substitution between the potential absorptive capacity and the actual absorptive capacity; the breadth of technological base and the intensity of absorption investment are relatively important for improving innovation performance. In addition, in terms of the external environment, rich external technological resources are one of the important conditions for boundary-spanning technology M&A firms to produce high innovation performance; in terms of internal strategies, boundary-spanning technology M&A firms are more likely to adopt an exploitative innovation tendency to achieve high innovation performance.
This study extends the absorptive capacity theory and provides an integrated verification of the absorptive capacity theory. The results further develop the research content related to the value realization of boundary-spanning technology M&A and enrich the empirical evidence in the field of boundary-spanning technology M&A. This study provides empirical evidence for enterprises to comprehensively examine the environment, formulate a reasonable innovation strategy and focus on developing absorptive capacity before boundary-spanning technology M&A to ensure the improvement of innovation performance. It also provides ideas for enterprises to fill in the gaps and provides a reference for enterprises with different characteristics to make boundary-spanning technology M&A decisions.
[1] 王宛秋,张潇天.谁更易在跨界技术并购中获益[J].科学学研究,2019,37(5):898-908.
[2] VOLPE L,BIFERALI D EDITH TILTON PENROSE.The theory of the growth of the firm[J].Journal of Management & Governance,2008,12(1):119-125.
[3] COHEN W M,LEVINTHAL D A.Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128.
[4] SHENG M L,CHIEN I.Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(6):2302-2308.
[5] ZAHRA S A,GEORGE G.Absorptive capacity:a review,reconceptualization,and extension[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203.
[6] DOZ Y L,OLK P M,RING P S.Formation processes of R&D consortia:which path to take? where does it lead[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):239-266.
[7] 岑杰,杨燕,张翠艳,等.技术知识系统与创新跳跃:基于双元转换的视角[J].科学学研究,2019,37(11):2073-2081.
[8] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017,33(6):155-167.
[9] FISS P C.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations[J].Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4):1180-1198.
[10] RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago: Chicago University Press,2008: 44-70.
[11] WHALEN R.Boundary spanning innovation and the patent system:interdisciplinary challenges for a specialized examination system[J].Research Policy,2018,47(7):1334-1343.
[12] FLOR M L,COOPER S Y,OLTRA M J.External knowledge search,absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms[J].European Management Journal,2018,36(2):183-194.
[13] 胡保亮,赵田亚,闫帅.高管团队行为整合、跨界搜索与商业模式创新[J].科研管理,2018,39(12):37-44.
[14] SEARS J B.Post-acquisition integrative versus independent innovation:a story of dueling success factors[J].Research Policy,2018,47(9):1688-1699.
[15] 张学勇,柳依依,罗丹,等.创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J].金融研究,2017,60(3):159-175.
[16] MARCH J G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[17] CHO S Y,KIM S K.Horizon problem and firm innovation:the influence of CEO career horizon,exploitation and exploration on breakthrough innovations[J].Research Policy,2017,46(10):1801-1809.
[18] 吴航,陈劲.探索性与利用性国际化的创新效应:基于权变理论的匹配检验[J].科研管理,2019,40(11):102-110.
[19] OJHA D,STRUCKELL E,ACHARYA C,et al.Supply chain organizational learning,exploration,exploitation,and firm performance:a creation-dispersion perspective[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2018,204:70-82.
[20] LENNERTS S,SCHULZE A,TOMCZAK T.The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance:an uneven affair[J].European Management Journal,2020,38(1):121-134.
[21] SCHWEISFURTH T G,RAASCH C.Absorptive capacity for need knowledge:antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness[J].Research Policy,2018,47(4):687-699.
[22] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效:一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010,26(5):118-129.
[23] 李金生,乔盈.高新技术企业研发团队沟通行为对自主创新绩效的影响:以知识吸收能力为中介变量[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(11):136-144.
[24] LANE P J,KOKA B R,PATHAK S.The reification of absorptive capacity:a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct[J].Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4):833-863.
[25] BRUTON G D,SU Z F,FILATOTCHEV I.New venture performance in transition economies from different institutional perspectives[J].Journal of Small Business Management,2018,56(3):374-391.
[26] BRADLEY S W,SHEPHERD D A,WIKLUND J.The importance of slack for new organizations facing 'tough' environments[J].Journal of Management Studies,2011,48(5):1071-1097.
[27] 奚雷,彭灿,张学伟.外部学习与双元创新协同性的关系:环境动态性的调节作用[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018,39(8):27-32.
[28] 韩国元,武红玉,孔令凯,等.知识存量对科技成果转化影响机理研究:知识距离的中介作用和学习能力的调节作用[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(6):173-179.
[29] LEAHY D,NEARY J P.Absorptive capacity,R&D spillovers,and public policy[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2007,25(5):1089-1108.
[30] TIMBERLAKE M,RAGIN C C.The comparative method:moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[J].Social Forces,1989,67(3):827.
[31] 张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业:基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济,2019,36(4):117-135.
[32] AHUJA G,KATILA R.Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms:a longitudinal study[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(3):197-220.
[33] 贾慧英,王宗军,曹祖毅.研发投入跳跃与组织绩效:环境动态性和吸收能力的调节效应[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(3):130-141.
[34] 席龙胜,张欣.经济政策不确定性、高管激励与企业研发投入——基于沪深A股上市公司的平衡面板数据[J].河南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):90-99.
[35] CHEN Y S,CHANG K C.Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance[J].Scientometrics,2012,90(3):825-841.
[36] FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420.
[37] MISANGYI V F,ACHARYA A G.Substitutes or complements? a configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2014,57(6):1681-1705.